Item learning in cognitive skill training: Effects of item difficulty

Item difficulty effects in skill learning were examined by giving participants extensive training with repeated alphabet arithmetic problems that varied in addend size (e.g., C − D = ? is easy; C − J = ? is harder). Recognition memory for the items, as measured by interpolated recognition tests, was acquired early in training and was unaffected by item difficulty. Memory for the solutions to items, as measured by the participants’ strategy reports that they had retrieved, rather than computed, the solution, was acquired later and was affected by item difficulty. Solutions to easier items were learned earlier in training for both young adults (18–24 years) and older adults (60–75 years), superimposed on an overall lower level of solution learning in older participants. The results suggest that the formation of associations between problems and their solutions is effortful and shares limited processing resources with the computational demands of the problem.

[1]  Hilde Haider,et al.  Why aggregated learning follows the power law of practice when individual learning does not: comment on Rickard (1997, 1999), Delaney et al. (1998), and Palmeri (1999). , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[2]  G. Logan Toward an instance theory of automatization. , 1988 .

[3]  Gordon D. Logan,et al.  Automatizing alphabet arithmetic: I. Is extended practice necessary to produce automaticity? , 1991 .

[4]  M. Naveh-Benjamin Adult age differences in memory performance: tests of an associative deficit hypothesis. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[5]  T W Picton,et al.  Attention and successful episodic encoding: an event-related potential study. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[6]  Denise C. Park,et al.  Handbook of the Psychology of Aging , 1979 .

[7]  J. Cerella Aging and Information-Processing Rate , 1990 .

[8]  T. Salthouse The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. , 1996, Psychological review.

[9]  Nicole D. Anderson,et al.  The attentional demands of encoding and retrieval in younger and older adults: 2. Evidence from secondary task reaction time distributions. , 1999, Psychology and aging.

[10]  J. Myerson,et al.  General lexical slowing and the semantic priming effect: the roles of age and ability. , 1997, Acta psychologica.

[11]  P. Barrouillet,et al.  Algorithmic Solution of Arithmetic Problems and Operands-Answer Associations in Long-Term Memory , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[12]  F. Craik,et al.  The attentional demands of encoding and retrieval in younger and older adults: 1. Evidence from divided attention costs. , 1998, Psychology and aging.

[13]  A. D. Fisk,et al.  An individual differences analysis of ability and strategy influences: age-related differences in associative learning. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  R. Siegler,et al.  Older and younger adults' strategy choices in multiplication: testing predictions of ASCM using the choice/no-choice method. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[15]  John F. Larish,et al.  Training for attentional control in dual task settings: A comparison of young and old adults , 1995 .

[16]  S. Hashtroudi,et al.  Effects of aging on priming and skill learning. , 1991, Psychology and aging.

[17]  Thomas J. Palmeri,et al.  An Exemplar-Based Random Walk Model of Speeded Classification , 1997 .

[18]  T. Salthouse,et al.  Aging associations: influence of speed on adult age differences in associative learning. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[19]  T. Salthouse,et al.  Meta-analyses of age-cognition relations in adulthood: estimates of linear and nonlinear age effects and structural models. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[20]  D. Woltz,et al.  Negative transfer errors in sequential cognitive skills: strong-but-wrong sequence application. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  Allen and Rosenbloom Paul S. Newell,et al.  Mechanisms of Skill Acquisition and the Law of Practice , 1993 .

[22]  Patrick C. Kyllonen,et al.  Memory for order of operations in the acquisition and transfer of sequential cognitive skills. , 1996 .

[23]  T. Palmeri Exemplar similarity and the development of automaticity. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  M Naveh-Benjamin,et al.  Divided attention during encoding and retrieval: differential control effects? , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[25]  T. Salthouse,et al.  Skilled performance: Effects of adult age and experience on elementary processes. , 1982 .

[26]  G. Logan Shapes of reaction-time distributions and shapes of learning curves: a test of the instance theory of automaticity. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[27]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Working Memory: Activation Limitations on Retrieval , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[28]  F. Craik Levels of processing: Past, present... and future? , 2002, Memory.

[29]  G D Logan,et al.  The transition from algorithm to retrieval in memory-based theories of automaticity , 1991, Memory & cognition.

[30]  Aaron S Benjamin,et al.  The effects of aging on selectivity and control in short-term recall , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[31]  Neil Charness,et al.  Acquiring skill at mental calculation in adulthood: a task decomposition , 1988 .

[32]  David L. Strayer,et al.  Aging and skill acquisition: learning-performance distinctions. , 1994, Psychology and aging.

[33]  T. Rickard Bending the power law : A CMPL theory of strategy shifts and the automatization of cognitive skills , 1997 .

[34]  L. Reder,et al.  The Strategy-Specific Nature of Improvement: The Power Law Applies by Strategy Within Task , 1998 .

[35]  Pierre Barrouillet,et al.  From algorithmic computing to direct retrieval: Evidence from number and alphabetic arithmetic in children and adults , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[36]  W. Hoyer,et al.  Instance-based automaticity and aging: acquisition, reacquisition, and long-term retention. , 2000, Psychology and aging.

[37]  R. Engle,et al.  Is working memory capacity task dependent , 1989 .

[38]  K. Cherry,et al.  Individual difference and contextual variables influence spatial memory in younger and older adults. , 1993, Psychology and aging.

[39]  J. Cerella,et al.  Cognitive skill acquisition and transfer in younger and older adults. , 2001 .