Best First Search Planning of Service Composition Using Incrementally Refined Context-Dependent Heuristics

In oder to decide if a agent capability is helpful to achieve a goal, modern search algorithms in AI research use heuristics to narrow the search space by indicating which capability is the best to use. Considering the lack of information about pragmatic meaning, creating sound heuristics automatically out of capability descriptions asks too much of modern reasoning algorithms. Most approaches use semantics in oder to enable the reasoner to improve Word-sense disambiguation in their ontology matching tasks. As semantics are meant to be shared, the information is context independent and quite general. I postulate that context-dependent meaning can play an important role in describing the meaning of concepts used, as some meaning might change with the changes in context. The proposed thesis creates context-dependent heuristics by combining expert knowledge with machine learning. The PhD has the goal of structuring descriptions with a concept introduced in linguistics, introducing a description of domain knowledge and contextual information and thereby enable the automatic creation of context-dependent heuristics. Choosing from the many improvement points of agent planning, this work focuses on the improvement of capability descriptions.

[1]  Liang Xiao,et al.  Multi-Step Truncated Q Learning Algorithm , 2005, 2005 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics.

[2]  Robert Givan,et al.  FF-Replan: A Baseline for Probabilistic Planning , 2007, ICAPS.

[3]  Maria Bittner,et al.  Cross-linguistic semantics , 1994 .

[4]  Alan Fern,et al.  The first learning track of the international planning competition , 2011, Machine Learning.

[5]  Valérie Issarny,et al.  Satisfying requirements for pervasive service compositions , 2012, MRT '12.

[6]  Gauthier Picard,et al.  Characterizing and Evaluating Problem Solving Self-* Systems , 2009, 2009 Computation World: Future Computing, Service Computation, Cognitive, Adaptive, Content, Patterns.

[7]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  Semantic Web Services and Web Process Composition, First International Workshop, SWSWPC 2004, San Diego, CA, USA, July 6, 2004, Revised Selected Papers , 2005, SWSWPC.

[8]  Axel Polleres,et al.  Semantische Beschreibung von Web Services , 2006, Semantic Web: Wege zur vernetzten Wissensgesellschaft.

[9]  Frank van Harmelen,et al.  C-OWL: Contextualizing Ontologies , 2003, SEMWEB.

[10]  Deborah L. McGuinness,et al.  Bringing Semantics to Web Services: The OWL-S Approach , 2004, SWSWPC.

[11]  Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede,et al.  Capabilities: Describing What Services Can Do , 2003, ICSOC.

[12]  Paraskevas Evripidou,et al.  Combining Pragmatics and Intelligence in Semantic Web Service Discovery , 2007, OTM Workshops.

[13]  Zahir Tari,et al.  On The Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2003: OTM 2003 Workshops , 2003, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[14]  Fausto Giunchiglia,et al.  Domains and context: First steps towards managing diversity in knowledge , 2012, J. Web Semant..

[15]  Sahin Albayrak,et al.  Self-Explaining Agents , 2013 .

[16]  Fausto Giunchiglia,et al.  Local Models Semantics, or Contextual Reasoning = Locality + Compatibility , 1998, KR.

[17]  Sahin Albayrak,et al.  Towards Self-Explaining Agents , 2013, PAAMS.

[18]  Ewa Orlowska,et al.  Service-Oriented Computing - ICSOC 2003 , 2003, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.