Identification of bat species in Greece from their echolocation calls

ABSTRACT Bats are the second most speciose order of mammals and are under significant threat throughout the world. Survey and monitoring of bats for conservation are severely hampered by the lack of a reliable and user-friendly method of identifying bats from their echolocation calls. We recorded and described time-expanded echolocation calls from 23 bat species in the National Park of Dadia-Lefkimi-Soufli, Greece. We compared the performance of quadratic and linear discriminant function analysis (DFA) of calls as a means of identifying species. Quadratic rather than linear DFA has been used by several researchers because of the violation of the method's basic assumption (homogeneity of variance-covariance matrices). However, when linear DFA was applied for the classification of recorded species in this study, correct classification rate was identical to the quadratic functions (82.4%) and linear models did not misclassify bats to the species with the greatest dispersion, the main problem caused by violation of the homogeneity assumption. The advantage of linear DFA is that it provides discriminant function coefficients. The linear combination of these coefficients and parameters from calls from unidentified bats can be used for species identification without access to the original data sets, an option not provided by quadratic analysis. When separate models were developed for Myotis species and for FM/QCF species, correct classification rates increased to 84.8% and 93.4%, respectively. DF coefficients thus provide a reliable identification tool, but intraspecific geographic variation must be taken into account.

[1]  Kirsty J. Park,et al.  Assortative roosting in the two phonic types of Pipistrellus pipistrellus during the mating season , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  G. Quinn,et al.  Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists , 2002 .

[3]  S. Harris,et al.  Identification of British bat species by multivariate analysis of echolocation call parameters , 1997 .

[4]  William L. Gannon,et al.  Geographic variation in the echolocation calls of the hoary bat ( Lasiurus cinereus) , 2000 .

[5]  H. Schnitzler,et al.  Plasticity in echolocation signals of European pipistrelle bats in search flight: implications for habitat use and prey detection , 1993, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[6]  Gareth Jones,et al.  Differences in songflight calls and social calls between two phonic types of the vespertilionid bat Pipistrellus pipistrellus , 1997 .

[7]  Gareth Jones,et al.  Identification of twenty‐two bat species (Mammalia: Chiroptera) from Italy by analysis of time‐expanded recordings of echolocation calls , 2002 .

[8]  Andy Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS (Ism Introducing Statistical Methods) , 2005 .

[9]  S. Parsons,et al.  Acoustic identification of twelve species of echolocating bat by discriminant function analysis and artificial neural networks. , 2000, The Journal of experimental biology.

[10]  Gareth Jones,et al.  Acoustic identification of bats from directly sampled and time expanded recordings of vocalizations , 2000 .

[11]  Stuart Parsons,et al.  Identification of New Zealand bats (Chalinolobus tuberculatus and Mystacina tuberculata) in flight from analysis of echolocation calls by artificial neural networks , 2001 .

[12]  David S. Jacobs,et al.  Variation in the echolocation calls of the hoary bat (Lasiurus cinereus) : influence of body size, habitat structure, and geographic location , 1999 .

[13]  Danilo Russo,et al.  The social calls of Kuhl's pipistrelles Pipistrellus kuhlii (Kuhl, 1819): structure and variation (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) , 1999 .

[14]  Klaus-Gerhard Heller,et al.  Resource partitioning of sonar frequency bands in rhinolophoid bats , 1989, Oecologia.

[15]  M. Holderied,et al.  Echolocation range and wingbeat period match in aerial-hawking bats , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  Lee A. Miller,et al.  The acoustic behavior of four species of vespertilionid bats studied in the field , 1981, Journal of comparative physiology.

[17]  G. Jones,et al.  Influence of age, sex and body size on echolocation calls of Mediterranean and Mehely’s horseshoe bats, Rhinolophus euryale and R. mehelyi (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) , 2001 .

[18]  M. Obrist Flexible bat echolocation: the influence of individual, habitat and conspecifics on sonar signal design , 1995, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[19]  A. Kiefer,et al.  Molecular species identification boosts bat diversity , 2007, Frontiers in Zoology.

[20]  M. Fenton,et al.  Recognition of Species of Insectivorous Bats by Their Echolocation Calls , 1981 .

[21]  J. Kusch,et al.  Structure and variability of bat social calls: implications for specificity and individual recognition , 2003 .

[22]  E. Kalko,et al.  Insect pursuit, prey capture and echolocation in pipestirelle bats (Microchiroptera) , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  R. Arlettaz,et al.  Low-frequency echolocation enables the bat Tadarida teniotis to feed on tympanate insects , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.