Structural damage alarming using auto-associative neural network technique : exploration of environment-tolerant capacity and setup of alarming threshold

Abstract With the intention of avoiding false-positive and false-negative alarms in structural damage alarming using the auto-associative neural network (AANN) technique, two issues pertaining to this technique are addressed in this study. The first issue explored is the environment-tolerant capacity of the AANN. Efforts have been made to seek a generalization technique to enhance the environment-tolerant capacity. First, a baseline AANN model is formulated using the conventional training algorithm. Generalization techniques including AIC and FPE, early stopping, and Bayesian regularization are then investigated, resulting in three new AANN models. Their environment-tolerant capacity is evaluated as per their capability to avoid false-positive and false-negative alarms. The other issue addressed is the setup of alarming threshold, with intent to reduce the uncertainty in AANN-based structural damage alarming. A procedure based on the probability analysis of the novelty index is proposed for this purpose. First, the novelty index characterizing the intact structure is analyzed by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov goodness-of-fit test to obtain its best-fit continuous probability distribution. A confidence interval is then defined in consideration of the compromise between type I and type II errors. The alarming threshold of the novelty index is consequently set at the upper limit of the confidence interval. The above explorations are examined by using the long-term monitoring data on modal properties of the cable-stayed Ting Kau Bridge. The capability to eliminate false-positive alarm is verified by using unseen testing data which were not used in formulating the AANN models, while the capability to alleviate false-negative alarm is examined by using simulated data from the ‘damaged’ bridge with the help of a precise finite element model. The study indicates that the early stopping technique performs best in improving the environment-tolerant capacity of the AANN, and the alarming threshold set by the proposed procedure helps to reduce the uncertainty in AANN-based structural damage alarming.

[1]  N. T. Kottegoda,et al.  Probability, Statistics, and Reliability for Civil and Environmental Engineers , 1997 .

[2]  Rolf G. Rohrmann,et al.  Structural causes of temperature affected modal data of civil structures obtained by long time monitoring , 2000 .

[3]  Elie Bienenstock,et al.  Neural Networks and the Bias/Variance Dilemma , 1992, Neural Computation.

[4]  Norris Stubbs,et al.  Documentation of Changes in Modal Properties of a Concrete Box‐Girder Bridge Due to Environmental and Internal Conditions , 2001 .

[5]  H. Hao,et al.  Long term vibration monitoring of an RC slab: Temperature and humidity effect , 2006 .

[6]  M. Kramer Nonlinear principal component analysis using autoassociative neural networks , 1991 .

[7]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  A summary review of vibration-based damage identification methods , 1998 .

[8]  G P Roberts,et al.  DYNAMIC MONITORING AS A TOOL FOR LONG SPAN BRIDGES , 1996 .

[9]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Novelty detection under changing environmental conditions , 2001, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[10]  Michael Schlaich,et al.  Ting Kau Bridge, Hong Kong , 1996 .

[11]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  VIBRATION-BASED DAMAGE DETECTION USING STATISTICAL PROCESS CONTROL , 2001 .

[12]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Variability of modal parameters measured on the alamosa canyon bridge , 1996 .

[13]  Kai-Yuen Wong,et al.  Instrumentation and health monitoring of cable‐supported bridges , 2004 .

[14]  Fu-Kuo Chang,et al.  Encyclopedia of structural health monitoring , 2009 .

[15]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Asymptotic statistical theory of overtraining and cross-validation , 1997, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[16]  S. Alampalli,et al.  EFFECTS OF TESTING, ANALYSIS, DAMAGE, AND ENVIRONMENT ON MODAL PARAMETERS , 2000 .

[17]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  Environmental variability of modal properties , 1999 .

[18]  A. Jenkinson The frequency distribution of the annual maximum (or minimum) values of meteorological elements , 1955 .

[19]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  An experimental study of temperature effect on modal parameters of the Alamosa Canyon Bridge , 1999 .

[20]  H. Akaike Fitting autoregressive models for prediction , 1969 .

[21]  Walter H. Dilger,et al.  Extreme values of thermal loading parameters in concrete bridges , 1992 .

[22]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Comparative study of damage identification algorithms applied to a bridge: I. Experiment , 1998 .

[23]  Darryll J. Pines,et al.  Status of structural health monitoring of long-span bridges in the United States , 2002 .

[24]  D. Mackay,et al.  Bayesian methods for adaptive models , 1992 .

[25]  Ming L. Wang,et al.  Observed Variations of Mode Frequencies of a Prestressed Concrete Bridge with Temperature , 2000 .

[26]  Jan Ming Ko,et al.  Automatic modal identification and variability in measured modal vectors of a cable-stayed bridge , 2005 .

[27]  Cesare Alippi Extending the FPE and the effective number of parameters to neural estimators , 1996, Proceedings of International Conference on Neural Networks (ICNN'96).

[28]  Yozo Fujino,et al.  Structural Health Monitoring and Intelligent Infrastructure , 2005 .

[29]  Gaëtan Kerschen,et al.  Structural damage diagnosis under varying environmental conditions—Part I: A linear analysis , 2005 .

[30]  Yi-Qing Ni,et al.  Modeling of Temperature–Frequency Correlation Using Combined Principal Component Analysis and Support Vector Regression Technique , 2007 .

[31]  Hervé Bourlard,et al.  Generalization and Parameter Estimation in Feedforward Netws: Some Experiments , 1989, NIPS.

[32]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  Structural damage classification using extreme value statistics , 2005 .

[33]  J. E. Harding,et al.  Bridge Management: Inspection, Maintenance, Assessment and Repair , 1990 .

[34]  Keith Worden,et al.  STRUCTURAL FAULT DETECTION USING A NOVELTY MEASURE , 1997 .

[35]  Enrique Castillo Extreme value theory in engineering , 1988 .

[36]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE ON DYNAMIC SYSTEM PARAMETERS OF A HIGHWAY BRIDGE , 1997 .

[37]  Gaëtan Kerschen,et al.  Structural damage diagnosis under varying environmental conditions - Part II: local PCA for non-linear cases , 2005 .

[38]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  System Identification: Theory for the User , 1987 .

[39]  Christopher M. Bishop,et al.  Neural networks for pattern recognition , 1995 .

[40]  S. Roberts Novelty detection using extreme value statistics , 1999 .

[41]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  One-year monitoring of the Z24-Bridge : environmental effects versus damage events , 2001 .