Making Manufacturing Practices Tacit: A Case Study of Computer-Aided Production Management and Lean Production

The idea that operations in batch repetitive manufacturing can be managed using formal manipulations on representations of the manufacturing practice is at the heart of an approach called Computer-Aided Production Management. It is argued that the plausibility of this approach arises from certain widely held, but now controversial, views about the nature of purposeful human activity, which assume the need for a central representational model. Alternative theories of cognitive activity can be used to clarify the approach of a recently influential group of production management techniques, known as Lean Production, which attempt to use changes to the situation of production as their leverage point. It is claimed that implementation of these ideas depends on rendering desirable practices tacit, and this idea is illustrated using a case study.

[1]  Hubert L. Dreyfus,et al.  Why computers may never think like people , 1989 .

[2]  Y. Sugimori,et al.  Toyota production system and Kanban system Materialization of just-in-time and respect-for-human system , 1977 .

[3]  Pierre Bourdieu,et al.  Outline of a Theory of Practice , 2020, On Violence.

[4]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Understanding computers and cognition , 1986 .

[5]  H. Gardner,et al.  The Mind's New Science , 1985 .

[6]  P. Bourdieu The Logic of Practice , 1990 .

[7]  Christopher Voss,et al.  Just-in-Time: A Global Status Report , 1989 .

[8]  John B. Kidd,et al.  Toyota Production System , 1993 .

[9]  H. Maturana,et al.  Autopoiesis and Cognition , 1980 .

[10]  John McCarthy,et al.  What Computers Still Can't Do , 1996, Artif. Intell..

[11]  G. Lakoff Women, fire, and dangerous things : what categories reveal about the mind , 1989 .

[12]  L. Suchman Plans and situated actions , 1987 .

[13]  David Chapman,et al.  Pengi: An Implementation of a Theory of Activity , 1987, AAAI.

[14]  William J. Clancey,et al.  Situated Action: A Neuropsychologiwl Interpretation Response to Vera and Simon , 2005 .

[15]  Daniel T. Jones,et al.  The machine that changed the world : based on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology 5-million dollar 5-year study on the future of the automobile , 1990 .

[16]  新郷 重夫,et al.  A study of the Toyota production system from an industrial engineering viewpoint , 1989 .

[17]  E. Rosch,et al.  The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience , 1993 .

[18]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind , 1988 .

[19]  R. Schonberger Japanese manufacturing techniques : nine hidden lessons simplicity , 1982 .

[20]  J. Greeno Situations, mental models, and generative knowledge. , 1989 .

[21]  R. A. Brooks,et al.  Intelligence without Representation , 1991, Artif. Intell..

[22]  Mauro Caputo,et al.  Production Management Techniques: Push‐Pull Classification and Application Conditions , 1988 .

[23]  P. Duchessi,et al.  Implementing a Manufacturing Planning and Control Information System , 1989 .

[24]  J. Lave Cognition in Practice: Outdoors: a social anthropology of cognition in practice , 1988 .

[25]  Kum Khiong Yang,et al.  A study on manufacturing resource planning (MRP II) practices in Singapore , 1993 .

[26]  Sue Newell,et al.  The Importance of User Design in the Adoption of New Information Technologies: The Example of Production and Inventory Control Systems (PICS) , 1993 .