DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION OF THE PRACTICAL ON-SITE COOPERATION MODEL (POCoM) FOR IMPROVING SCIENCE TEACHING IN SECONDARY SCHOOLS

This study aimed to improve science teaching in a practical way by activating teachers’ potential teaching expertise or professional knowledge. We developed an alternative in-service approach, the Practical On-site Cooperation Model (POCoM), according to the following principles: (1) the “bottom-up” approach, where observed problems in science classes are improved practically and immediately without any pre-determined teaching plan or materials; (2) “cooperation” between researchers and teachers to improve teaching; (3) “naturalistic settings” where various real problems occur in actual teaching and learning situations; and (4) “gradual improvement” rather than revolutionary change. The POCoM was applied with three science teachers, and 24 classes were observed. We found about 65%–96% teaching improvement. The analysis of the cooperation processes and science teaching in classrooms identified seven types of successful improvements and five types of unsatisfactory cases, including their reasons and features. Key words: cooperative model, in-service teacher, observational protocol, professional development, science teaching.

[1]  Sandy Buczynski,et al.  Impact of professional development on teacher practice: Uncovering connections , 2010 .

[2]  Jin-Su Jeong,et al.  KOREAN SCIENCE TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS AND ACTUAL USAGE OF EDUCATIONAL THEORIES/TEACHING STRATEGIES IN THEIR TEACHING , 2016 .

[3]  Jan H. van Driel,et al.  Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers' practical knowledge , 2001 .

[4]  Young-Shin Park,et al.  THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE KOREAN TEACHING OBSERVATION PROTOCOL (KTOP) FOR IMPROVING SCIENCE TEACHING AND LEARNING , 2014, Journal of Baltic Science Education.

[5]  Garry F. Hoban,et al.  The missing links in teacher education design : developing a multi-linked conceptual framework , 2005 .

[6]  Tina Hascher *,et al.  Forget about theory—practice is all? Student teachers' learning in practicum , 2004 .

[7]  Amanda Berry,et al.  Pedagogical Content Knowledge , 2012 .

[8]  R. Duit,et al.  Improving Science and Mathematics Instruction: The SINUS Project as an example for reform as teacher professional development , 2010 .

[9]  James Hiebert,et al.  A Knowledge Base for the Teaching Profession: What Would It Look Like and How Can We Get One? , 2002 .

[10]  Mary Catherine Scheeler,et al.  Generalizing Teaching Techniques from University to K-12 Classrooms: Teaching Preservice Teachers to Use What They Learn , 2009 .

[11]  M. Giannakaki,et al.  Student teachers’ experiences of initial teacher preparation in England: core themes and variation , 2008 .

[12]  Ralph T. Putnam,et al.  What Do New Views of Knowledge and Thinking Have to Say About Research on Teacher Learning? , 2000 .

[13]  Kevin Dunbar,et al.  What Scientific Thinking Reveals About the Nature of Cognition , 2000 .

[14]  Carla C. Johnson.  Effective Professional Development and Change in Practice: Barriers Science Teachers Encounter and Implications for Reform , 2006 .

[15]  Garry Hoban.  The Missing Links in Teacher Education Design , 2005 .

[16]  Lawrence P. Gallagher,et al.  Is Alignment Enough? Investigating the Effects of State Policies and Professional Development on Science Curriculum Implementation. , 2009 .

[17]  Fred A. J. Korthagen,et al.  The gap between research and practice revisited , 2007 .

[18]  Jonathan A. Supovitz,et al.  The Effects of Professional Development on Science Teaching Practices and Classroom Culture , 2000 .

[19]  J. Wallace,et al.  Science teaching and teachers' knowledge: Prospects for reform of elementary classrooms , 1992 .

[20]  Nancy L. Cooke,et al.  Using In-Service and Coaching to Increase Teachers’ Accurate Use of Research-Based Strategies , 2012 .

[21]  Jong-Won Park,et al.  Using deductive reasoning to promote the change of students' conceptions about force and motion , 2002 .

[22]  Bongani D. Bantwini,et al.  How teachers perceive the new curriculum reform: Lessons from a school district in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa , 2010 .

[23]  Kathleen S. Davis.  "Change is hard": What science teachers are telling us about reform and teacher learning of innovative practices , 2003 .

[24]  L. Chisholm,et al.  Curriculum reform in post-1990s sub-Saharan Africa , 2008 .

[25]  A. Traianou.  Understanding teacher expertise in primary science: a sociocultural approach , 2006 .

[26]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Factors Contributing to Teachers’ Sustained Use of Kindergarten Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies , 2010 .

[27]  Jong-Won Park,et al.  Developing and Applying In-Service Program for Spreading the Practical On-site Cooperation Model (POCoM) , 2014 .

[28]  H. Eijkelhof,et al.  Algemene natuurwetenschappen (ANW): A new course on public understanding of science for senior general secondary education in the Netherlands , 2000 .

[29]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  Perspectives on Evidence-Based Research in Education—What Works? Issues in Synthesizing Educational Program Evaluations , 2008 .

[30]  Angela Calabrese Barton,et al.  Reframing "Science for all" through the Politics of Poverty , 1998 .

[31]  Douglas B. Larkin,et al.  Implementing and Sustaining Science Curriculum Reform: A Study of Leadership Practices among Teachers within a High School Science Department. , 2009 .

[32]  S. Southerland,et al.  Chapter 2 Resisting Unlearning: Understanding Science Education’s Response to the United States’s National Accountability Movement , 2007 .

[33]  Iris R. Weiss,et al.  Lessons from a Decade of Mathematics and Science Reform: A Capstone Report for the Local Systemic Change through Teacher Enhancement Initiative. , 2006 .

[34]  Pamela Joy Mulhall,et al.  Understanding and Developing Science Teachers' Pedagogical Content Knowledge , 2006 .

[35]  Anthony J Gabriele,et al.  Preservice Teachers' Prior Beliefs: Transforming Obstacles into Opportunities. , 1998 .