Review lecture: Apposition eyes of large diurnal insects as organs adapted to seeing
暂无分享,去创建一个
(1) The fields of view of the photoreceptor cells are determined by the dimensions and anatomical arrangement of the optical part of the ommatidium. The dimensions, and therefore the fields of view of the ommatidia are also related across the eye. In the relation between structure and function there are many points that invite discussion, but the intention is to order our knowledge so that the gaps become obvious. (2) The first step has been to make maps of the eyes showing the maximum theoretical resolving power of the facets and also the interommatidial angle, the reciprocal of which is the maximum spatial resolution of combinations of facets. The ratio of these two resolutions at each point shows the minimum overlap of the visual fields. These maps can be made from the outside of the eye; they show the main types of eye. (3) The next step is to work out the optics of individual ommatidia so that the focal lengths and receptor widths can be measured. The field width can then be predicted from the facet size and the subtense of the receptor at the posterior nodal point. The final step is to measure the field widths of individual ommatidia experimentally as a test of the optical theory, and to make maps of the actual fields in their correct position on the eye in angular coordinates. (4) Three examples of maps of actual fields are given, and their anatomical and diffraction components are separated. The maps are an essential step towards the electrophysiological analysis of the ganglia behind the eye. A theory of the origin of the fields in terms of anatomy and optics also opens the way to an analysis of mechanisms that change the field size upon adaptation to light. A comparative study of the fields in different eye regions and in different species can also be related to visual habits and behaviour.
[1] A. Mallock. I. Insect sight and the defining power of composite eyes , 1894, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London.
[2] Roger C. Hardie,et al. Fly photoreceptors. III. Angular sensitivity as a function of wavelength and the limits of resolution , 1976, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.
[3] George Adrian Horridge,et al. Insects which turn and look , 1977 .
[4] Roger Clayton Hardie. Peripheral visual function in the fly , 1978 .