Developing spatial biophysical accounting for multiple ecosystem services

Ecosystem accounting is receiving increasing interest as a way to systematically monitor the conditions of ecosystems and the ecosystem services they provide. A critical element of ecosystem accounting is understanding spatially explicit flows of ecosystem services. We developed spatial biophysical models of seven ecosystem services in a cultural landscape (Limburg province, the Netherlands) in a way that is consistent with ecosystem accounting. We included hunting, drinking water extraction, crop production, fodder production, air quality regulation, carbon sequestration and recreational cycling. In addition, we examined how human inputs can be distinguished from ecosystem services, a critical element in ecosystem accounting. Model outcomes were used to develop an ecosystem accounting table in line with the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting - Experimental Ecosystem Accounting (SEEA EEA) guidelines, in which contributions of land cover types to ecosystem service flows were recorded. Furthermore we developed spatial accounts for single statistical units. This study shows that for the case of Limburg spatial modelling for ecosystem accounting in line with SEEA EEA is feasible. The paper also analyses and discusses key challenges that need to be addressed to develop a well-functioning system for ecosystem accounting.

[1]  Lars Hein,et al.  Mapping Ecosystem Services for Land Use Planning, the Case of Central Kalimantan , 2014, Environmental Management.

[2]  Patricia Balvanera,et al.  Methods for mapping ecosystem service supply: a review , 2012 .

[3]  K. Petz,et al.  Modelling land management effect on ecosystem functions and services: a study in the Netherlands , 2012 .

[4]  L. Hein,et al.  Towards a consistent approach for ecosystem accounting , 2013 .

[5]  Louise Willemen,et al.  A blueprint for mapping and modelling ecosystem services , 2013 .

[6]  I.J.J. van den Wyngaert,et al.  Mogelijkheden voor koolstofvastlegging in de Nederlandse landbouw en natuur , 2012 .

[7]  J. Boyd,et al.  Nonmarket benefits of nature: What should be counted in green GDP? , 2007 .

[8]  A.P.E. van Oudenhoven,et al.  Framework for systematic indicator selection to assess effects of land management on ecosystem services , 2012 .

[9]  C. Dormann,et al.  A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead , 2011 .

[10]  Georgina M. Mace,et al.  Economic Analysis for Ecosystem Service Assessments , 2011 .

[11]  Åsa Jansson,et al.  Accounting for ecosystem services as a way to understand the requirements for sustainable development , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Neil A Powe,et al.  Mortality and morbidity benefits of air pollution (SO2 and PM10) absorption attributable to woodland in Britain. , 2004, Journal of environmental management.

[13]  B. Grizzetti,et al.  Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union , 2012 .

[14]  G. Nabuurs,et al.  The Dutch National System for forest sector greenhouse gas reporting under UNFCCC , 2008 .

[15]  Louise Willemen,et al.  Space for people, plants, and livestock? Quantifying interactions among multiple landscape functions in a Dutch rural region , 2010 .

[16]  P. Kuikman,et al.  Trends in soil organic matter contents in Dutch grasslands and maize fields on sandy soils , 2009 .

[17]  Peter H. Verburg,et al.  Future carbon sequestration in Europe—Effects of land use change , 2008 .

[18]  Rob Alkemade,et al.  Consequences of Uncertainty in Global-Scale Land Cover Maps for Mapping Ecosystem Functions: An Analysis of Pollination Efficiency , 2011, Remote. Sens..

[19]  M. Lefebvre,et al.  European agricultural landscapes, common agricultural policy and ecosystem services: a review , 2013, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[20]  A.P.E. van Oudenhoven,et al.  UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Ecosystem Services as a Contested Concept: A Synthesis of Critique and Counter-arguments Schötter, , 2014 .

[21]  R. D. de Groot,et al.  Typology and indicators of ecosystem services for marine spatial planning and management. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[22]  Rob H. G. Jongman,et al.  Homogenisation and fragmentation of the European landscape: ecological consequences and solutions , 2002 .

[23]  J. Boyd,et al.  What are Ecosystem Services? The Need for Standardized Environmental Accounting Units , 2006 .

[24]  L. Hein,et al.  Accounting for capacity and flow of ecosystem services: A conceptual model and a case study for Telemark, Norway , 2014 .

[25]  L. Hein,et al.  How and where to map supply and demand of ecosystem services for policy-relevant outcomes? , 2012 .

[26]  R. Costanza,et al.  Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  C. Linstead,et al.  Uncertainty analysis in a GIS-based multi-criteria analysis tool for river catchment management , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[28]  S. Elowson Willow as a vegetation filter for cleaning of polluted drainage water from agricultural land , 1999 .

[29]  P. Verburg,et al.  Quantifying and mapping ecosystem services: Demand and supply of pollination in the European Union , 2014 .

[30]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  The impact of proxy‐based methods on mapping the distribution of ecosystem services , 2010 .

[31]  R. Haines-Young,et al.  Ecosystem Ecology: The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being , 2010 .

[32]  R. Moss,et al.  Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment , 2003 .

[33]  G. Daily,et al.  Natural Capital: Theory and Practice of Mapping Ecosystem Services , 2011 .

[34]  F. Müller,et al.  Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets , 2012 .

[35]  M. Hadžiosmanović,et al.  DRESSED AND UNDRESSED WEIGHT IN NATURALLY BRED WILD BOAR (SUS SCROFA): THE POSSIBLE INFLUENCE OF CROSSBREEDING , 2011 .

[36]  Gary W. Johnson,et al.  Spatial dynamics of ecosystem service flows: A comprehensive approach to quantifying actual services , 2013 .

[37]  O. Oenema,et al.  Soil organic carbon contents of agricultural land in the Netherlands between 1984 and 2004 , 2009 .

[38]  M. Schelhaas,et al.  A spatial assessment of ecosystem services in Europe: Methods, case studies and policy analysis - phase 1 , 2011 .

[39]  Willem Bouten,et al.  A quantitative framework for assessing spatial flows of ecosystem services , 2014 .

[40]  J. Wesseling,et al.  Grootschalige concentratie- en depositiekaarten Nederland : Rapportage 2012 , 2011 .

[41]  G. Daily,et al.  Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales , 2009 .

[42]  Ciara Raudsepp-Hearne,et al.  The use of geographic information systems to map and assess ecosystem services , 2012, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[43]  Neville D. Crossman,et al.  Land science contributions to ecosystem services , 2013 .

[44]  Eva Negri,et al.  Long-term particulate matter exposure and mortality: a review of European epidemiological studies , 2009, BMC public health.

[45]  R. Costanza,et al.  Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[46]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  E. Barbier Valuing Ecosystem Services as Productive Inputs , 2007 .

[48]  Hiroyuki Matsuda,et al.  Biodiversity and ecosystem services science for a sustainable planet: the DIVERSITAS vision for 2012-20. , 2012, Current opinion in environmental sustainability.

[49]  Gail Taylor,et al.  Effective Tree Species for Local Airquality Management , 2000, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

[50]  Joachim H. Spangenberg,et al.  Provision of ecosystem services is determined by human agency, not ecosystem functions. Four case studies , 2014 .

[51]  N. Crossman,et al.  The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: The Ecological and Economic Foundations (TEEB D0). , 2010 .

[52]  N Künzli,et al.  Public-health impact of outdoor and traffic-related air pollution: a European assessment , 2000, The Lancet.

[53]  P. Ciais,et al.  The carbon budget of terrestrial ecosystems at country-scale – a European case study , 2004 .