Comparison of AR.Drone Quadricopter Video and the Visual CTLA Method for Urban Tree Hazard Rating
暂无分享,去创建一个
Daniel Unger | I-Kuai Hung | David L. Kulhavy | Yanli Zhang | D. Kulhavy | I. Hung | D. Unger | Yanli Zhang
[1] R. Helliwell. AMENITY VALUATION OF TREES AND WOODLANDS , 2008 .
[2] Lian Pin Koh,et al. Small Drones for Community-Based Forest Monitoring: An Assessment of Their Feasibility and Potential in Tropical Areas , 2014 .
[3] John Sessions,et al. Eyes in the Sky: Remote Sensing Technology Development Using Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems , 2013 .
[4] D. Kulhavy,et al. Comparison of Tree Condition and Value for City Parks and Stephen F. Austin State University in Nacogdoches, Texas, U.S. , 2014, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.
[5] Sebastian Scherer,et al. First results in detecting and avoiding frontal obstacles from a monocular camera for micro unmanned aerial vehicles , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.
[6] Nicolas Petit,et al. The Navigation and Control technology inside the AR.Drone micro UAV , 2011 .
[7] Esperanza Ayuga Téllez,et al. Methods of Tree Appraisal: A Review of Their Features and Application Possibilities , 2012, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.
[8] D. Helliwell. THE AMENITY VALUE OF TREES AND WOODLANDS , 1967 .
[9] E. Mcpherson,et al. Quantifying urban forest structure, function, and value: the Chicago Urban Forest Climate Project , 1995, Urban Ecosystems.
[10] Karen Anderson,et al. Lightweight unmanned aerial vehicles will revolutionize spatial ecology , 2013 .
[11] David J. Nowak,et al. Compensatory Value of Urban Trees in the United States , 2002, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.