Ageing effects on plasmonic properties for solar cell applications

Metal nanoparticles are known for their unique optical properties due to surface plasmon excitations. The far field and near field effects from these metal particles have been captured to enhance efficiency of thin film solar cells by way of light trapping. Our group has extensively studied the different design parameters for a plasmon enhanced solar cell like effect of metal size/shape, location, effect of dielectric layer thickness and also the effect of plasmons on the electrical properties like passivation of cells. Whilst identifying and minimising parasitic absorption losses in these metal particles are important and is attracting lot of attention, we choose to look at a more interesting issue of ageing effects. Plasmonics at the moment promises efficiency enhancements exceeding 30% including associated losses in metals. However as is needed for solar cells, the technologies incorporated have to stand the test of time. In this work we look at the age effects on the plasmon performance by analysing our cells over time. Our preliminary results show that plasmons supported by silver metal nanoparticles can degrade by upto 10% with time. Metal nanoparticles when exposed to air can get tarnished easily causing degradation of the plasmonic properties. This will result in weakening of the scattering and reduce light trapping effects. We also look at ways of minimizing the ageing losses by overcoating. MgF2 is used as the dielectric film to overcoat metal nanoparticles preventing degradation and also to isolate MNP layer from the back surface reflector of cells. Our results show that such a rear scheme brings an additional current enhancement over interested wavelength region improving over time.

[1]  K. Drexhage.  Influence of a dielectric interface on fluorescence decay time , 1970 .

[2]  Martin A. Green,et al.  Effective light trapping in polycrystalline silicon thin-film solar cells by means of rear localized surface plasmons , 2010 .

[3]  Martin A. Green,et al.  The effect of dielectric spacer thickness on surface plasmon enhanced solar cells for front and rear side depositions , 2011 .

[4]  M. Moskovits.  Surface‐enhanced Raman spectroscopy: a brief retrospective , 2005 .

[5]  K. H. Jolliffee.  Optical properties of thin solid films , 1954 .

[6]  F. Tangherlini,et al.  Optical Constants of Silver, Gold, Copper, and Aluminum. II. The Index of Refraction n , 1954 .

[7]  M. Green,et al.  Surface plasmon enhanced silicon solar cells , 2007 .

[8]  G. D. Scott,et al.  The Structure of Evaporated Metal Films and Their Optical Properties , 1950 .

[9]  P. Campbell,et al.  Light trapping in textured solar cells , 1990 .

[10]  Vladimir M. Shalaev,et al.  Searching for better plasmonic materials , 2009, 0911.2737.

[11]  G. Wurtz,et al.  Plasmonic nanorod metamaterials for biosensing. , 2009, Nature materials.

[12]  M. Green,et al.  24·5% Efficiency silicon PERT cells on MCZ substrates and 24·7% efficiency PERL cells on FZ substrates , 1999 .

[13]  Jeffrey N. Anker,et al.  Biosensing with plasmonic nanosensors. , 2008, Nature materials.

[14]  H. Atwater,et al.  Plasmonics for improved photovoltaic devices. , 2010, Nature materials.

[15]  M. Green,et al.  Enhanced light trapping for high efficiency crystalline solar cells by the application of rear surface plasmons , 2012 .

[16]  Albert Polman,et al.  Asymmetry in photocurrent enhancement by plasmonic nanoparticle arrays located on the front or on the rear of solar cells , 2010 .

[17]  Paul A. Basore,et al.  Extended spectral analysis of internal quantum efficiency , 1993, Conference Record of the Twenty Third IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference - 1993 (Cat. No.93CH3283-9).