A statistically defined anthropomorphic software breast phantom.

PURPOSE Digital anthropomorphic breast phantoms have emerged in the past decade because of recent advances in 3D breast x-ray imaging techniques. Computer phantoms in the literature have incorporated power-law noise to represent glandular tissue and branching structures to represent linear components such as ducts. When power-law noise is added to those phantoms in one piece, the simulated fibroglandular tissue is distributed randomly throughout the breast, resulting in dense tissue placement that may not be observed in a real breast. The authors describe a method for enhancing an existing digital anthropomorphic breast phantom by adding binarized power-law noise to a limited area of the breast. METHODS Phantoms with (0.5 mm)(3) voxel size were generated using software developed by Bakic et al. Between 0% and 40% of adipose compartments in each phantom were replaced with binarized power-law noise (β = 3.0) ranging from 0.1 to 0.6 volumetric glandular fraction. The phantoms were compressed to 7.5 cm thickness, then blurred using a 3 × 3 boxcar kernel and up-sampled to (0.1 mm)(3) voxel size using trilinear interpolation. Following interpolation, the phantoms were adjusted for volumetric glandular fraction using global thresholding. Monoenergetic phantom projections were created, including quantum noise and simulated detector blur. Texture was quantified in the simulated projections using power-spectrum analysis to estimate the power-law exponent β from 25.6 × 25.6 mm(2) regions of interest. RESULTS Phantoms were generated with total volumetric glandular fraction ranging from 3% to 24%. Values for β (averaged per projection view) were found to be between 2.67 and 3.73. Thus, the range of textures of the simulated breasts covers the textures observed in clinical images. CONCLUSIONS Using these new techniques, digital anthropomorphic breast phantoms can be generated with a variety of glandular fractions and patterns. β values for this new phantom are comparable with published values for breast tissue in x-ray projection modalities. The combination of conspicuous linear structures and binarized power-law noise added to a limited area of the phantom qualitatively improves its realism.

[1]  A. Burgess,et al.  Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise. , 2001, Medical physics.

[2]  Ingrid Reiser,et al.  Comparison of power spectra for tomosynthesis projections and reconstructed images. , 2009, Medical physics.

[3]  Ann-Katherine Carton,et al.  Simulation of tomosynthesis images based on an anthropomorphic software breast tissue phantom , 2008, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[4]  K Bliznakova,et al.  A three-dimensional breast software phantom for mammography simulation. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  Arthur E. Burgess,et al.  Mammographic structure: data preparation and spatial statistics analysis , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[6]  J. S. Laughlin,et al.  Absorbed radiation dose in mammography. , 1979, Radiology.

[7]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  A method for modifying the image quality parameters of digital radiographic images. , 2003, Medical physics.

[8]  P. C. Johns,et al.  X-ray characterisation of normal and neoplastic breast tissues. , 1987, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  J. Boone,et al.  Dedicated breast CT: initial clinical experience. , 2008, Radiology.

[10]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Development and characterization of an anthropomorphic breast software phantom based upon region-growing algorithm. , 2011, Medical physics.

[11]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  An anthropomorphic breast model for breast imaging simulation and optimization. , 2011, Academic radiology.

[12]  Raffaella Rossi,et al.  Physical characteristics of GE Senographe Essential and DS digital mammography detectors. , 2008, Medical physics.

[13]  Kai Yang,et al.  The characterization of breast anatomical metrics using dedicated breast CT. , 2011, Medical physics.

[14]  Predrag R. Bakic,et al.  SU-GG-I-132: Refinements to the Deformation Model of an Anthropomorphic Computer Generated Breast Phantom , 2010 .

[15]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Mammogram synthesis using a 3D simulation. I. Breast tissue model and image acquisition simulation. , 2002, Medical physics.

[16]  Mini Das,et al.  Development of an Ensemble of Digital Breast Object Models , 2010, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[17]  Dragana Brzakovic,et al.  Mammogram synthesis using a three-dimensional simulation. III. Modeling and evaluation of the breast ductal network. , 2003, Medical physics.

[18]  M J Yaffe,et al.  The myth of the 50-50 breast. , 2009, Medical physics.

[19]  Spencer Gunn,et al.  Introducing DeBRa: a detailed breast model for radiological studies. , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  Robert M. Nishikawa,et al.  An Anthropomorphic Software Breast Phantom for Tomosynthesis Simulation: Power Spectrum Analysis of Phantom Projections , 2010, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[21]  R M Nishikawa,et al.  Task-based assessment of breast tomosynthesis: effect of acquisition parameters and quantum noise. , 2010, Medical physics.

[22]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Mammogram synthesis using a 3D simulation. II. Evaluation of synthetic mammogram texture. , 2002, Medical physics.

[23]  J. Boone,et al.  The effect of skin thickness determined using breast CT on mammographic dosimetry. , 2008, Medical physics.

[24]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Optimized generation of high resolution breast anthropomorphic software phantoms. , 2012, Medical physics.

[25]  John M Boone,et al.  Methodology for generating a 3D computerized breast phantom from empirical data. , 2009, Medical physics.

[26]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Development of an anthropomorphic breast software phantom based on region growing algorithm , 2008, SPIE Medical Imaging.