Performance of a spatio-temporal error model for raster datasets under complex error patterns

The CLC (Combined Location Classification) error model provides indices for overall data uncertainty in thematic spatio-temporal datasets. It accounts for the two major sources of error in such datasets, location error and classification error. The model assumes independence between error components, while recent studies revealed various degrees of correlation between error components in actual datasets. The goal of this study is to determine if the likely violation of model assumptions biases model predictions. A comprehensive algorithm was devised to simulate the entire process of error formation and propagation. Time series thematic maps were constructed, and modified maps were derived as realizations of underlying error patterns. Error rate and pattern (positive autocorrelation) were controlled for location error and for classification error. The magnitude of correlation between errors from different sources and correlation between error at different time steps was also controlled. A very good agreement between model predictions and simulation results was found in the absence of correlation in error between time steps and between error types, while the inclusion of such correlations was shown to affect model fit slightly. Given our current knowledge of spatio-temporal error patterns in real data, the CLC error model can be used reliably to assess the overall uncertainty in thematic change detection analyses.

[1]  D. Dean,et al.  Combining location and classification error sources for estimating multi-temporal database accuracy , 2001 .

[2]  Donald L. Phillips,et al.  Spatial uncertainty analysis: propagation of interpolation errors in spatially distributed models , 1996 .

[3]  H. Todd Mowrer,et al.  Propagating uncertainty through spatial estimation processes for old-growth subalpine forests using sequential Gaussian simulation in GIS , 1997 .

[4]  Siamak Khorram,et al.  The effects of image misregistration on the accuracy of remotely sensed change detection , 1998, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[5]  Frank W. Davis,et al.  Sensitivity of wildlife habitat models to uncertainties in GIS data , 1992 .

[6]  Marc Antrop Uncertainty, errors and doubts using GIS and remote sensing in environmental studies , 1996 .

[7]  Robert Haining,et al.  Error Propagation Through Map Operations , 1993 .

[8]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data : principles and practices , 1998 .

[9]  Phaedon C. Kyriakidis,et al.  A geostatistical approach for mapping thematic classification accuracy and evaluating the impact of inaccurate spatial data on ecological model predictions , 2001, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[10]  K. Lowell,et al.  Spatial Accuracy Assessment : Land Information Uncertainty in Natural Resources , 1999 .

[11]  Howard Veregin,et al.  Developing and Testing of an Error Propagation Model for GIS Overlay Operations , 1995, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[12]  Peter F. Fisher,et al.  Improved Modeling of Elevation Error with Geostatistics , 1998, GeoInformatica.

[13]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  Development and test of an error model for categorical data , 1992, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[14]  Nicholas Chrisman,et al.  THE ERROR COMPONENT IN SPATIAL DATA , 2005 .

[15]  Christopher Justice,et al.  The impact of misregistration on change detection , 1992, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[16]  D. Stow Reducing the effects of misregistration on pixel-level change detection , 1999 .

[17]  C. McClean,et al.  An investigation of uncertainty in field habitat mapping and the implications for detecting land cover change , 1995, Landscape Ecology.

[18]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  Applying Spatial Autocorrelation Analysis to Evaluate Error in New England Forest-Cover-Type Maps Derived from Landsat Thematic Mapper Data , 2001 .