Hypothesis Verification in Model-Based Object Recognition with a Gaussian Error Method

The use of hypothesis verification is recurrent in the model based recognition literature. Small sets of features forming salient groups are paired with model features. Poses can be hypothesised from this small set of feature-to-feature correspondences. The verification of the pose consists in measuring how much model features transformed by the computed pose coincide with image features. When data involved in the initial pairing are noisy the pose is inaccurate and the verification is a difficult problem. In this paper we propose a robust hypothesis verification algorithm, assuming data error is Gaussian. Previous approaches using gaussian error model start from an initial set of correspondences and try to extend it feature by feature. This solution is not optimal. In this paper, the opposite strategy is adopted. Assuming the right pose belongs to a known volume of the pose space (including the initial pose) we take into account all of the correspondences compatible with this volume and refine iteratively this set of correspondences. This is our main contribution. We present experimental results obtained with 2D recognition proving that the proposed algorithm is fast and robust.

[1]  Daniel P. Huttenlocher,et al.  Measuring the Quality of Hypotheses in Model-Based Recognition , 1992, ECCV.

[2]  Alex Pentland,et al.  View-based and modular eigenspaces for face recognition , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[3]  Tarak Gandhi,et al.  Robust feature selection for object recognition using uncertain 2D image data , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[4]  Thomas M. Breuel,et al.  Fast recognition using adaptive subdivisions of transformation space , 1992, Proceedings 1992 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[5]  David W. Jacobs,et al.  Robust and Efficient Detection of Salient Convex Groups , 1996, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[6]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Higher Order Differential Structure of Images , 1993, IPMI.

[7]  W. Eric L. Grimson,et al.  A Study of Affine Matching With Bounded Sensor Error , 1992, ECCV.

[8]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Modal Matching for Correspondence and Recognition , 1995, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[9]  Daniel P. Huttenlocher,et al.  Comparing Images Using the Hausdorff Distance , 1993, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[10]  W. Eric L. Grimson,et al.  Gaussian error models for object recognition , 1993, Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[11]  Roberto Brunelli,et al.  Person identification using multiple cues , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[12]  Frans C. A. Groen,et al.  3D object recognition from 2D images using geometric hashing , 1992, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[13]  W. Eric L. Grimson The Combinatorics of Heuristic Search Termination for Object Recognition in Cluttered Environments , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[14]  Clark F. Olson Time and space efficient pose clustering , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[15]  David W. Jacobs,et al.  Error propagation in full 3D-from-2D object recognition , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[16]  R. Fletcher Practical Methods of Optimization , 1988 .

[17]  Rakesh Mohan,et al.  Multidimensional indexing for recognizing visual shapes , 1991, Proceedings. 1991 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.