Patch Testing of Mercaptobenzothiazole and Mercapto Mix: The North American Contact Dermatitis Group Experience, 1994–2016

Objectives Mercapto compounds are a category of rubber accelerators that may cause allergic contact dermatitis. This study characterizes patch test reactions to mercaptobenzothiazole (MBT) and mercapto mix (MM) in a large North American population. Methods The 1994–2016 North American Contact Dermatitis Group screening series data were analyzed. Patients with allergic reactions to either MBT or MM (mercapto+) were included. The following characteristics were analyzed: strength of reaction, clinical and occupational relevance, coreactivity with other rubber accelerators, and sources of exposure. Results A total of 49,795 patients were tested to mercapto compounds from 1994 to 2016; 633 (1.3%) had positive reactions to MBT and/or MM. The frequency to both MBT and MM significantly decreased over time (P < 0.0001). Mercapto+ patients were significantly more likely to be male, have occupationally related skin disease, and report involvement of the hands and/or feet (P < 0.0001). They were significantly less likely to have face, scalp/ears/neck, or trunk involvement (P ≤ 0.0001). There was significant coreactivity with carba mix (23.4%) and thiuram mix (32.5%). Mercaptobenzothiazole and MM reactions were frequently clinically (81.7% and 83.5%, respectively) and occupationally relevant (29.8% and 33.4%, respectively). Gloves were the most common source (31.3% and 30.9%, respectively). Conclusions Patch test positivity to mercapto compounds significantly decreased from 1994 to 2016 but remains clinically and occupationally relevant.

[1]  E. Warshaw,et al.  Patch Testing to Diphenylguanidine by the North American Contact Dermatitis Group (2013–2016) , 2020, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.

[2]  H. Maibach,et al.  Revised Baseline Series of the International Contact Research Group. , 2020, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.

[3]  I. Neri,et al.  Allergic contact dermatitis caused by the elastic borders of diapers , 2020, Contact dermatitis.

[4]  D. Tennstedt,et al.  The preservative 2‐(thiocyanomethylthio)benzothiazole: A potential allergen in leather products , 2019, Contact dermatitis.

[5]  A. Herman,et al.  Allergic contact dermatitis caused by synthetic rubber gloves in healthcare workers: Sensitization to 1,3‐diphenylguanidine is common , 2019, Contact dermatitis.

[6]  C. Rodrigo,et al.  A seven-year retrospective analysis of patch test data in a cohort of patients with contact dermatitis in Sri Lanka , 2019, BMC Dermatology.

[7]  M. Bruze,et al.  Patch Testing with a New Composition of Mercapto Mix: A Multi-centre Study by the Swedish Contact Dermatitis Research Group. , 2019, Acta dermato-venereologica.

[8]  M. Bovenzi,et al.  Contact Dermatitis in Northeast Italy Mechanics (1996–2016) , 2019, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.

[9]  E. Warshaw,et al.  North American Contact Dermatitis Group Patch Test Results: 2015–2016 , 2018, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.

[10]  S. Chauhan,et al.  Pesticide contact dermatitis in agricultural workers of Himachal Pradesh (India) , 2018, Contact dermatitis.

[11]  Sara A. Hylwa,et al.  Rubber Accelerators in Medical Examination and Surgical Gloves , 2018, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.

[12]  A. Heratizadeh,et al.  Contact sensitization in patients with suspected textile allergy. Data of the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK) 2007–2014 , 2017, Contact dermatitis.

[13]  W. Uter,et al.  European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies (ESSCA): results with the European baseline series, 2013/14 , 2017, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV.

[14]  J. Geier,et al.  Occupational contact sensitization in female geriatric nurses: Data of the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK) 2005–2014 , 2017, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV.

[15]  J. Geier,et al.  Patch test results with rubber series in the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies (ESSCA), 2013/14 , 2016, Contact dermatitis.

[16]  J. Thyssen,et al.  Contact allergy to rubber accelerators remains prevalent: retrospective results from a tertiary clinic suggesting an association with facial dermatitis , 2016, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV.

[17]  A. Prodi,et al.  Sensitization to Rubber Accelerators in Northeastern Italy: The Triveneto Patch Test Database , 2016, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.

[18]  C. Zachariae,et al.  Contact Allergy in Danish Healthcare Workers: A Retrospective Matched Case-control Study. , 2016, Acta dermato-venereologica.

[19]  A. Schnuch,et al.  ESSCA results with the baseline series, 2009–2012: rubber allergens , 2015, Contact dermatitis.

[20]  M. Carder,et al.  UK rates of occupational skin disease attributed to rubber accelerators, 1996–2012 , 2015, Contact dermatitis.

[21]  A. Palmer,et al.  The first Australian Baseline Series: Recommendations for patch testing in suspected contact dermatitis , 2015, The Australasian journal of dermatology.

[22]  A. Schnuch,et al.  Patch test results of the European baseline series among patients with occupational contact dermatitis across Europe – analyses of the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergy network, 2002–2010 , 2015, Contact dermatitis.

[23]  C. Svedman,et al.  Reaction profile in patch testing with allergens formed during vulcanization of rubber , 2014, Contact dermatitis.

[24]  E. Warshaw,et al.  Concomitant Patch Test Reactions to Mercapto Mix and Mercaptobenzothiazole: Retrospective Analysis From the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 1994–2008 , 2013, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.

[25]  E. Warshaw,et al.  North American Contact Dermatitis Group Patch Test Results: 2009 to 2010 , 2013, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.

[26]  M. Bruze,et al.  Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by sterile non‐latex protective gloves: clinical investigation and chemical analyses , 2013, Contact dermatitis.

[27]  A. Goossens,et al.  Allergic contact dermatitis caused by latex (natural rubber)‐free gloves in healthcare workers , 2013, Contact dermatitis.

[28]  S. Nedorost,et al.  Allergic contact dermatitis probably caused by mercaptobenzothiazole in thermal undergarments , 2012, Contact dermatitis.

[29]  J. Geier,et al.  Contact allergy in the cleaning industry: analysis of contact allergy surveillance data of the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology , 2011, Contact dermatitis.

[30]  F. Hao,et al.  A retrospective study of patch tests in Chongqing, China from 2004 to 2009 , 2011, Contact dermatitis.

[31]  C. Ni,et al.  Contact Sensitization in Chinese Patients with Hand Eczema , 2011, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.

[32]  Jie-Ming Dong,et al.  Time trends of contact allergy to a modified European baseline series in Beijing between 2001 and 2006 , 2011, Contact dermatitis.

[33]  K. Menting,et al.  Rubber, 9. Chemicals and Additives , 2011 .

[34]  A. Schnuch,et al.  The European baseline series in Lithuania: results of patch testing in consecutive adult patients , 2011, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV.

[35]  P. Siegel,et al.  Allergic contact dermatitis to synthetic rubber gloves: changing trends in patch test reactions to accelerators. , 2010, Archives of dermatology.

[36]  S. Farmer,et al.  An 8‐Year Retrospective Review of Patch Testing with Rubber Allergens: The Mayo Clinic Experience , 2010, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.

[37]  Antonio Prado Moreno,et al.  Vlerick Leuven Gent Working Paper Series 2003/22 Starting Resource Configurations of Research-based Start-ups and the Interaction with Technology , 2022 .

[38]  H. Maibach,et al.  Long-term trend in patch test reactions: a 32-year statistical overview (1970–2002), part II , 2008, Cutaneous and ocular toxicology.

[39]  R. H. Simoyi,et al.  Mercaptobenzothiazole allergenicity—role of the thiol group , 2008, Cutaneous and ocular toxicology.

[40]  E. Warshaw,et al.  Shoe Allergens: Retrospective Analysis of Cross‐Sectional Data from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 2001‐2004 , 2007, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.

[41]  C. Hansson,et al.  Chemical changes in rubber allergens during vulcanization , 2007, Contact dermatitis.

[42]  S. Chowdhuri,et al.  Epidemio-allergological study in 155 cases of footwear dermatitis. , 2007, Indian journal of dermatology, venereology and leprology.

[43]  E. Warshaw,et al.  Contact dermatitis of the hands: cross-sectional analyses of North American Contact Dermatitis Group Data, 1994-2004. , 2007, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[44]  C. Hansson,et al.  Contact dermatitis to a rubber allergen with both dithiocarbamate and benzothiazole structure , 2007, Contact dermatitis.

[45]  M. Macedo,et al.  Contact allergy in male construction workers in Sao Paulo, Brazil, 2000–2005 , 2007, Contact dermatitis.

[46]  William W. Huang,et al.  Pediatric Dermatology , 1960, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[47]  O. Gefeller,et al.  Both mercaptobenzothiazole and mercapto mix should be part of the standard series , 2006, Contact dermatitis.

[48]  J. Wilkinson,et al.  Mercaptobenzothiazole or the mercapto‐mix: which should be in the standard series? , 2006, Contact dermatitis.

[49]  E. Warshaw,et al.  Allergic contact dermatitis from mercapto compounds. , 2006, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.

[50]  D. Gawkrodger,et al.  10 years' experience of patch testing with a shoe series in 230 patients: which allergens are important? , 2005, Contact dermatitis.

[51]  W. James,et al.  The utility of the TRUE test in a private practice setting. , 2005, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.

[52]  J. Geier,et al.  Patch test results with the metalworking fluid series of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG) , 2004, Contact dermatitis.

[53]  Chee‐ching Sun,et al.  Type IV Hypersensitivity from Rubber Chemicals: A 15-Year Experience in Taiwan , 2004, Dermatology.

[54]  J. Geier,et al.  Occupational rubber glove allergy: results of the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK), 1995–2001 , 2003, Contact dermatitis.

[55]  J. Geier,et al.  Diagnostic screening for contact allergy to mercaptobenzothiazole derivatives. , 2002, American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society.

[56]  H. Dickel,et al.  Occupational relevance of positive standard patch-test results in employed persons with an initial report of an occupational skin disease , 2002, International archives of occupational and environmental health.

[57]  M. Ventura,et al.  Contact dermatitis in students practicing sports: incidence of rubber sensitisation , 2001, British journal of sports medicine.

[58]  V. Singhal,et al.  Common Contact Sensitizers in Delhi , 2000, The Journal of dermatology.

[59]  James S. Taylor,et al.  Cutaneous Reactions to Rubber , 2000 .

[60]  E. Warshaw,et al.  North American Contact Dermatitis Group Patch Test Results 2013–2014 , 2000, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.

[61]  B. Kręcisz,et al.  An unusual case of contact allergy to mercaptobenzothiazole in antifreeze , 1999, Contact dermatitis.

[62]  M. Corazza,et al.  Contact allergy to mercaptobenzothiazole in a bank clerk from a wet sponge , 1999, Contact dermatitis.

[63]  A. Taïeb,et al.  Usefulness of the European standard series for patch testing in children A 3‐year single‐centre study of 337 patients , 1999, Contact dermatitis.

[64]  L. Condé‐Salazar,et al.  Occupational allergic contact dermatitis in construction workers , 1995, Contact dermatitis.

[65]  T. Risby,et al.  Skin elicitation threshold of ethylbutyl thiourea and mercaptobenzothiazole with relative leaching from sensitizing products , 1994, Contact dermatitis.

[66]  L. Condé‐Salazar,et al.  Type IV allergy to rubber additives: a 10-year study of 686 cases. , 1993, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[67]  C. Hansson,et al.  Stability of the mercaptobenzothiazole compounds , 1993, Contact dermatitis.

[68]  B. Meding,et al.  Occupational hand eczema in an industrial city , 1990, Contact dermatitis.

[69]  R. Rietschel Role of socks in shoe dermatitis. , 1984, Archives of dermatology.

[70]  J. Reepmeyer,et al.  Contamination of injectable solutions with 2-mercaptobenzothiazole leached from rubber closures. , 1983, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[71]  E. Kortschak RUBBER CHEMICALS * , 1977, The Australasian journal of dermatology.

[72]  W. J. S. NAUNTON,et al.  Rubber: , 1936, Nature.

[73]  Anna E. Kersh,et al.  Glove-Related Allergic Contact Dermatitis , 2018, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.

[74]  F. Rasool,et al.  Footwear Contact Dermatitis: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study of 108 Outpatients from Delhi, India. , 2018, Skinmed.

[75]  E. Warshaw,et al.  Occupational Contact Dermatitis in Mechanics and Repairers Referred for Patch Testing: Retrospective Analysis From the North American Contact Dermatitis Group 1998–2014 , 2017, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.

[76]  J. Geier,et al.  COD Contact Dermatitis Occupational contact allergy caused by rubber gloves – nothing has changed , 2012 .

[77]  I. Duarte,et al.  Frequency of occupational contact dermatitis in an ambulatory of dermatologic allergy. , 2010, Anais brasileiros de dermatologia.

[78]  H. Maibach,et al.  The International Contact Dermatitis Research Group , 2009 .

[79]  J. Yiannias,et al.  Changing trends and allergens in the patch test standard series: a mayo clinic 5-year retrospective review, january 1, 2001, through december 31, 2005. , 2008, Archives of dermatology.

[80]  O. Gefeller,et al.  Contact allergy in construction workers: results of a multifactorial analysis. , 2004, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[81]  S. Fregert,et al.  Allergic contact dermatitis from mercaptobenzothiazole in cutting oil. , 1962, Acta dermato-venereologica.