A DEM Analysis of Flow Characteristics of Noncohesive Particles in Hopper

Flow characteristics of material in hoppers, silos, and bins are critical issues for operational stability as well as structural integrity of these units. In this work, flow of noncohesive particles in hopper is studied using the discrete element method (DEM) where each particle is tracked for its position, velocity, and acceleration. Material properties tend to alter during hopper flow due to compaction, expansion, and segregation. These features are difficult to model with a continuum approach. In the first part, material flow patterns are correlated with hopper angle and hopper opening, the two main design parameters. The typical shift from mass flow to funnel flow depending on the hopper angle was successfully simulated. In the second part, the discharge rate of material was quantitatively analyzed as function of hopper design parameters. Beverloo model 1 was tested on these simulated flow rates and it was shown that the simulated flow rates follow the model for this specific granular system. However, the DEM analysis was also able to demonstrate the failure of the traditional Beverloo model in the restricted flow regime. Simulated flow rates also follow the empirical correlations with hopper angle as stated in literature. DEM simulations were validated with experimental data for both material flow pattern and discharge rates.

[1]  Kerry Johanson,et al.  Rathole stability analysis for aerated powder materials , 2004 .

[2]  P. A. Langston,et al.  Distinct element simulation of interstitial air effects in axially symmetric granular flows in hoppers , 1996 .

[3]  S. Barringer,et al.  Flow property measurement of food powders and sensitivity of Jenike’s hopper design methodology to the measured values , 2004 .

[4]  Amlan Datta,et al.  Discrete element analysis of tumbling mills , 2000 .

[5]  N. Djordjevic.  Influence of charge size distribution on net-power draw of tumbling mill based on DEM modelling , 2005 .

[6]  Gerald H. Ristow,et al.  Forces on the walls and stagnation zones in a hopper filled with granular material , 1995 .

[7]  P. Jönsson,et al.  The Use of Coated Pellets in Optimising the Blast Furnace Operation , 2003 .

[8]  Andrew Drescher,et al.  Arching in hoppers: I. Arching theories and bulk material flow properties , 1995 .

[9]  G. A. Kohring,et al.  Computer simulations of critical, non-stationary granular flow through a hopper , 1995 .

[10]  Yutaka Tsuji,et al.  Numerical simulation of two-dimensional fluidized beds using the discrete element method (comparison between the two- and three-dimensional models) , 1998 .

[11]  P. Cundall,et al.  A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies , 1979 .

[12]  Aibing Yu,et al.  Experimental and numerical investigation of the effect of buoyancy force on solid flow , 2003 .

[13]  Beena Sukumaran,et al.  Influence of inherent particle characteristics on hopper flow rate , 2003 .

[14]  Guy T. Houlsby,et al.  The flow of granular materials—I: Discharge rates from hoppers , 1982 .

[15]  Brahmeshwar Mishra,et al.  On the determination of contact parameters for realistic DEM simulations of ball mills , 2001 .

[16]  Luis A. Godoy,et al.  A viscoplastic approach to model the flow of granular solids , 2000 .

[17]  R. M. Nedderman,et al.  The discharge of fine sands from conical hoppers , 1995 .

[18]  Junya Kano,et al.  Simulation of Mass Flow Rate of Particles Discharged from Hopper by Particle Element Method , 1998 .

[19]  P. A. Langston,et al.  Discrete element simulation of internal stress and flow fields in funnel flow hoppers , 1995 .

[20]  Jian Fei Chen,et al.  Flow pattern measurement in a full scale silo containing iron ore , 2005 .

[21]  Paul Zulli,et al.  Discrete Particle Simulation of Solid Flow in a Model Blast Furnace , 2005 .

[22]  Fritz Ebert,et al.  Three-dimensional discrete element simulations in hoppers and silos , 2005 .

[23]  Paul Langston,et al.  Distinct element modelling of non-spherical frictionless particle flow , 2004 .

[24]  Jan C. Jofriet,et al.  A Numerical Model for Flow of Granular Materials in Silos. Part 1: Model Development , 1997 .

[25]  P. A. Langston,et al.  Discrete element simulation of granular flow in 2D and 3D hoppers: Dependence of discharge rate and wall stress on particle interactions , 1995 .

[26]  F. Bertrand,et al.  DEM-based models for the mixing of granular materials , 2005 .

[27]  Tom Dyakowski,et al.  Flow of sphero-disc particles in rectangular hoppers - A DEM and experimental comparison in 3D , 2004 .

[28]  Aibing Yu,et al.  Microdynamic analysis of the particle flow in a cylindrical bladed mixer , 2004 .

[29]  John J. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Effect of powder properties and storage conditions on the flowability of milk powders with different fat contents , 2004 .

[30]  Shan Jing,et al.  An experimental study on the mechanics of arching in hoppers connected to a moving bed with negative pressure gradient , 1998 .

[31]  J. M. Rotter,et al.  Experiments on a square planform steel silo , 2000 .

[32]  Gerald H. Ristow.  Outflow rate and wall stress for two-dimensional hoppers , 1997 .

[33]  Brahmeshwar Mishra,et al.  A review of computer simulation of tumbling mills by the discrete element method: Part I—contact mechanics , 2003 .

[34]  R. Nedderman,et al.  Air-impeded discharge of fine particles from a hopper , 1977 .

[35]  Paul W. Cleary,et al.  DEM modelling of industrial granular flows: 3D case studies and the effect of particle shape on hopper discharge , 2002 .

[36]  R. T. Fowler,et al.  The flow of granular solids through orifices , 1959 .

[37]  Graham J. Weir,et al.  A mathematical model for dilating, non-cohesive granular flows in steep-walled hoppers , 2004 .