Human head-neck biomechanics under axial tension.

A significant majority of cervical spine biomechanics studies has applied the external loading in the form of compressive force vectors. In contrast, there is a paucity of data on the tensile loading of the neck structure. These data are important as the human neck not only resists compression but also has to withstand distraction due to factors such as the anatomical characteristics and loading asymmetry. Furthermore, evidence exists implicating tensile stresses to be a mechanism of cervical spinal cord injury. Recent advancements in vehicular restraint systems such as air bags may induce tension to the neck in adverse circumstances. Consequently, this study was designed to develop experimental methodologies to determine the biomechanics of the human cervical spinal structures under distractive forces. A part-to-whole approach was used in the study. Four experimental models from 15 unembalmed human cadavers were used to demonstrate the feasibility of the methodology. Structures included isolated cervical spinal cords, intervertebral disc units, skull to T3 preparations, and intact unembalmed human cadavers. Axial tensile forces were applied, and the failure load and distraction were recorded. Stiffness and energy absorbing characteristics were computed. Maximum forces for the spinal cord specimens were the lowest (278 N +/- 90). The forces increased for the intervertebral disc (569 N +/- 54). skull to T3 (1555 N +/- 459), and intact human cadaver (3373 N +/- 464) preparations, indicating the load-carrying capacities when additional components are included to the experimental model. The experimental methodologies outlined in the present study provide a basis for further investigation into the mechanism of injury and the clinical applicability of biomechanical parameters.

[1]  G Ray,et al.  Mathematical and finite element analysis of spine injuries. , 1987, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[2]  W. Crutchfield Skeletal traction in treatment of injuries to the cervical spine. , 1954, Journal of the American Medical Association.

[3]  E. Transfeldt,et al.  Multiple-level noncontiguous spinal fractures. , 1989, The Journal of trauma.

[4]  A Elhagediab,et al.  Biomechanical properties of human lumbar spine ligaments. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  Narayan Yoganandan,et al.  Injury biomechanics of the human cervical column. , 1990 .

[6]  Narayan Yoganandan,et al.  Cervical spine injuries from motor vehicle accidents , 1990 .

[7]  Anthony Sances,et al.  Mechanisms of Head and Spine Trauma , 1986 .

[8]  A. Sances,et al.  Effects of vertebral column distraction in the monkey. , 1982, Journal of neurosurgery.

[9]  Sherk The Cervical spine , 1983 .

[10]  A. Sances,et al.  The biomechanics of spinal injuries. , 1984, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[11]  M. Blacksin,et al.  Patterns of fracture after air bag deployment. , 1993, The Journal of trauma.

[12]  Bernard Saltzberg,et al.  Experimental studies of brain and neck injury , 1981 .

[13]  S. Larson,et al.  Mechanical and physiological effects of dentatotomy. , 1977, Journal of neurosurgery.

[14]  M. Gold,et al.  Cervical spine injury in an air-bag-equipped vehicle. , 1993, Journal of spinal disorders.

[15]  James H. McElhaney,et al.  COMBINED BENDING AND AXIAL LOADING RESPONSES OF THE HUMAN CERVICAL SPINE , 1988 .