Collaborative Learning in Heterogeneous Classes - Towards a Group Formation Methodology

Group work has been adopted as an important tool to support collaborative work in order to enhance learning processes. There is a wealth of literature related to group performance and the impact of group composition on group and individual performance. However, very few studies address the issue on how to automatically form groups. This article proposes a methodology that could be used by professors to form groups automatically taking into account different criteria as well as the students' profile. This methodology is based on a pilot study that analyzes group composition of self-formed student groups. The pilot study findings suggest that students tend to form homogeneous group in terms of level of the knowledge. Furthermore, students report that working on common topics of interests was a decisive factor in forming the groups.

[1]  Martin Rich,et al.  A Learning Community on the Internet:An exercise with Masters Students , 1997 .

[2]  Kathrin Kirchner,et al.  Personal knowledge management: The role of Web 2.0 tools for managing knowledge at individual and organisational levels , 2009, Online Inf. Rev..

[3]  Estefanía Martín,et al.  Using Learning Styles for Dynamic Group Formation in Adaptive Collaborative Hypermedia Systems , 2004, ICWE Workshops.

[4]  R. Bekele.  Computer-Assisted Learner Group Formation Based on Personality Traits , 2006 .

[5]  John H. Bradley,et al.  The effect of personality type on team performance , 1997 .

[6]  B. Nijstad,et al.  Creativity and group innovation , 2002 .

[7]  R. Slavin.  Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research and Practice , 1990 .

[8]  Peter Mykytyn,et al.  Impact of heterogeneity and collaborative conflict management style on the performance of synchronous global virtual teams , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[9]  Enrique Alfonseca,et al.  The impact of learning styles on student grouping for collaborative learning: a case study , 2006, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[10]  Liana Razmerita,et al.  Web 2.0 Applications, Collaboration and Cognitive Processes in Case-Based Foreign Language Learning , 2009, WSKS.

[11]  Chuen-Tsai Sun,et al.  DIANA: A computer-supported heterogeneous grouping system for teachers to conduct successful small learning groups , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[12]  Adina Magda Florea,et al.  An Agent-based Collaborative Learning System , 2007 .

[13]  Chien-Ming Chen,et al.  Applying the genetic encoded conceptual graph to grouping learning , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[14]  Bette Chambers,et al.  Teacher motivation to implement an educational innovation: factors differentiating users and non-users of cooperative learning , 2004 .

[15]  R. Bjork,et al.  Learning, Remembering, Believing: Enhancing Human Performance , 1994 .

[16]  Walter Montenarie,et al.  Springer Science and Business Media , 2004 .

[17]  Ryder Payne,et al.  Perspectives on small group learning : theory & practice , 1990 .

[18]  R. Slavin.  Developmental and motivational perspectives on cooperative learning: a reconciliation , 1987 .

[19]  R. Slavin.  When does cooperative learning increase student achievement , 1983 .

[20]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  The sociability of computer-supported collaborative learning environment , 2002, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[21]  Feng-Hsu Wang,et al.  Composing High-Heterogeneous and High-Interaction Groups in Collaborative Learning with Particle Swarm Optimization , 2009, 2009 WRI World Congress on Computer Science and Information Engineering.

[22]  S. Sharan.  Handbook of Cooperative Learning Methods , 1994 .

[23]  George Siemens.  Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age , 2004 .

[24]  B. Nijstad,et al.  Group creativity : An introduction , 2003 .

[25]  Sabine Graf,et al.  Forming Heterogeneous Groups for Intelligent Collaborative Learning Systems with Ant Colony Optimization , 2006, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[26]  N. Webb.  Peer interaction and learning in small groups , 1989 .