Spatio-temporal “global” neurodynamics of the human brain in continuous and discrete picture: Simple statistics meet on-manifold microstates as multi-level cortical attractors

The neural manifold in state space represents the mass neural dynamics of a biological system. A challenging modern approach treats the brain as a whole in terms of the interaction between the agent and the world. Therefore, we need to develop a method for this global neural workspace. The current study aimed to visualize spontaneous neural trajectories regardless of their measuring modalities (electroencephalography [EEG], functional magnetic resonance imaging [fMRI], and magnetoencephalography [MEG]). First, we examined the possible visualization of EEG manifolds. These results suggest that a spherical surface can be clearly observed within the spatial similarity space where canonical microstates are on-manifold. Once valid (e.g., differentiable) and useful (e.g., low-dimensional) manifolds are obtained, the nature of the sphere, such as shape and size, becomes a possible target of interest. Because these should be practically useful, we suggest advantages of the EEG manifold (essentially continuous) or the state transition matrix (coarse-grained discrete). Finally, because our basic procedure is modality-independent, MEG and fMRI manifolds were also compared. These results strongly suggest the need to update our understanding of neural mass representations to include robust “global” dynamics.

[1]  Michael S. Gaffrey,et al.  Spatiotemporal dynamics of EEG microstates in four- to eight-year-old children: Age- and sex-related effects , 2022, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  J. Mattingley,et al.  State-dependent effects of neural stimulation on brain function and cognition , 2022, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[3]  H. Imamizu,et al.  Real-Time Detection and Feedback of Canonical Electroencephalogram Microstates: Validating a Neurofeedback System as a Function of Delay , 2022, Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience.

[4]  Luke J. Hearne,et al.  Focal neural perturbations reshape low-dimensional trajectories of brain activity supporting cognitive performance , 2022, Nature Communications.

[5]  Yukie Nagai,et al.  World model learning and inference , 2021, Neural Networks.

[6]  Ryan J. Low,et al.  Geometry of abstract learned knowledge in the hippocampus , 2021, Nature.

[7]  A. Mucci,et al.  EEG-Based Measures in At-Risk Mental State and Early Stages of Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review , 2021, Frontiers in Psychiatry.

[8]  N. Kriegeskorte,et al.  Neural tuning and representational geometry , 2021, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[9]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Two views on the cognitive brain , 2021, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[10]  Jiaxiang Zhang,et al.  MEG cortical microstates: Spatiotemporal characteristics, dynamic functional connectivity and stimulus-evoked responses , 2021, NeuroImage.

[11]  G. Jackson,et al.  Artifact Reduction in Simultaneous EEG-fMRI: A Systematic Review of Methods and Contemporary Usage , 2021, Frontiers in Neurology.

[12]  O. Papaspiliopoulos High-Dimensional Probability: An Introduction with Applications in Data Science , 2020 .

[13]  S. Borgwardt,et al.  EEG microstates as biomarker for psychosis in ultra-high-risk patients , 2020, Translational Psychiatry.

[14]  M. Herzog,et al.  EEG microstates are a candidate endophenotype for schizophrenia , 2020, Nature Communications.

[15]  A. Zanesco EEG Electric Field Topography is Stable During Moments of High Field Strength , 2020, Brain Topography.

[16]  Michael X. Cohen,et al.  EEG microstates as a continuous phenomenon , 2019, NeuroImage.

[17]  Ronald R. Coifman,et al.  Visualizing structure and transitions in high-dimensional biological data , 2019, Nature Biotechnology.

[18]  James P. Reilly,et al.  Capturing the Forest but Missing the Trees: Microstates Inadequate for Characterizing Shorter-Scale EEG Dynamics , 2019, Neural Computation.

[19]  Brandon G. King,et al.  Within and between-person correlates of the temporal dynamics of resting EEG microstates , 2019, NeuroImage.

[20]  R. Bowtell,et al.  Simultaneous EEG-fMRI: Evaluating the Effect of the EEG Cap-Cabling Configuration on the Gradient Artifact , 2019, Front. Neurosci..

[21]  K. Appel,et al.  Every Planar Map Is Four Colorable , 2019, Mathematical Solitaires & Games.

[22]  Julia M. Huntenburg,et al.  A mind-brain-body dataset of MRI, EEG, cognition, emotion, and peripheral physiology in young and old adults , 2019, Scientific Data.

[23]  Helmut Laufs,et al.  EEG Microstate Sequences From Different Clustering Algorithms Are Information-Theoretically Invariant , 2018, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[24]  Thomas Koenig,et al.  EEG microstates as a tool for studying the temporal dynamics of whole-brain neuronal networks: A review , 2017, NeuroImage.

[25]  R. D. Pascual-Marqui,et al.  The EEG microstate topography is predominantly determined by intracortical sources in the alpha band , 2017, NeuroImage.

[26]  Mehrdad Jazayeri,et al.  Navigating the Neural Space in Search of the Neural Code , 2017, Neuron.

[27]  Naoki Masuda,et al.  Energy landscape analysis of neuroimaging data , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[28]  Daniel Brandeis,et al.  Inappropriate assumptions about EEG state changes and their impact on the quantification of EEG state dynamics , 2016, NeuroImage.

[29]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  OMEGA: The Open MEG Archive , 2016, NeuroImage.

[30]  B. Baars,et al.  Human Neuroscience Hypothesis and Theory Article Tuning Pathological Brain Oscillations with Neurofeedback: a Systems Neuroscience Framework , 2022 .

[31]  Geraint Rees,et al.  Energy landscape and dynamics of brain activity during human bistable perception , 2014, Nature Communications.

[32]  Byron M. Yu,et al.  Neural constraints on learning , 2014, Nature.

[33]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Functional connectomics from resting-state fMRI , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[34]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A Bayesian Foundation for Individual Learning Under Uncertainty , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[35]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Correspondence of the brain's functional architecture during activation and rest , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Segmentation of brain electrical activity into microstates: model estimation and validation , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[37]  D. Lehmann Multichannel topography of human alpha EEG fields. , 1971, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[38]  M. Arns,et al.  Electroencephalographic Microstates as Novel Functional Biomarkers for Adult Attention-De fi cit/Hyperactivity Disorder , 2022 .

[39]  K. Grammer,et al.  Female faces and bodies: N-dimensional feature space and attractiveness. , 2002 .