Optimization of Scanning and Counting Sensor Layout for Full Route Observability with a Bi-Level Programming Model

Utilizing the data obtained from both scanning and counting sensors is critical for efficiently managing traffic flow on roadways. Past studies mainly focused on the optimal layout of one type of sensor, and how to optimize the arrangement of more than one type of sensor has not been fully researched. This paper develops a methodology that optimizes the deployment of different types of sensors to solve the well-recognized network sensors location problem (NSLP). To answer the questions of how many, where and what types of sensors should be deployed on each particular link of the network, a novel bi-level programming model for full route observability is presented to strategically locate scanning and counting sensors in a network. The methodology works in two steps. First, a mathematical program is formulated to determine the minimum number of scanning sensors. To solve this program, a new ‘differentiating matrix’ is introduced and the corresponding greedy algorithm of ‘differentiating first’ is put forward. In the second step, a scanning map and an incidence matrix are incorporated into the program, which extends the theoretical model for multiple sensors’ deployment and provides the replacement method to reduce total cost of sensors without loss of observability. The algorithm developed at the second step involved in two coefficient matrixes from scanning map and incidence parameter enumerate all possibilities of replacement schemes so that cost of different combination schemes can be compared. Finally, the proposed approach is demonstrated by comparison of Nguyen-Dupuis network and real network, which indicates the proposed method is capable to evaluate the trade-off between cost and all routes observability.

[1]  Hong Kam Lo,et al.  Non-planar hole-generated networks and link flow observability based on link counters , 2014 .

[2]  Enrique Castillo,et al.  Observability of traffic networks. Optimal location of counting and scanning devices , 2013 .

[3]  Carlos Canudas-de-Wit,et al.  Graph constrained-CTM observer design for the Grenoble south ring , 2012 .

[4]  Enrique F. Castillo,et al.  Matrix Tools for General Observability Analysis in Traffic Networks , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[5]  Hong Kam Lo,et al.  Robust network sensor location for complete link flow observability under uncertainty , 2016 .

[6]  Pitu B. Mirchandani,et al.  Sensor Location Model to Optimize Origin–Destination Estimation with a Bayesian Statistical Procedure , 2013 .

[7]  Enrique Castillo,et al.  Optimal traffic plate scanning location for OD trip matrix and route estimation in road networks , 2010 .

[8]  Enrique F. Castillo,et al.  Optimal Use of Plate-Scanning Resources for Route Flow Estimation in Traffic Networks , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[9]  Raffaele Cerulli,et al.  Vehicle-ID sensor location for route flow recognition: Models and algorithms , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  Enrique Castillo,et al.  Trip matrix and path flow reconstruction and estimation based on plate scanning and link observations , 2008 .

[11]  Ning Wang,et al.  Model to Locate Sensors for Estimation of Static Origin–Destination Volumes Given Prior Flow Information , 2012 .

[12]  W. Y. Szeto,et al.  A State-of-the-Art Review of the Sensor Location, Flow Observability, Estimation, and Prediction Problems in Traffic Networks , 2015, J. Sensors.

[13]  David S. Johnson,et al.  Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness , 1978 .

[14]  Lawrence A. Klein ITS Sensors and Architectures for Traffic Management and Connected Vehicles , 2017 .

[15]  Monica Gentili,et al.  Locating Active Sensors on Traffic Networks , 2005, Ann. Oper. Res..

[16]  Srinivas Peeta,et al.  Identification of vehicle sensor locations for link-based network traffic applications , 2009 .

[17]  Enrique Castillo,et al.  Dealing with Error Recovery in Traffic Flow Prediction Using Bayesian Networks Based on License Plate Scanning Data , 2011 .

[18]  Monica Gentili,et al.  Locating sensors on traffic networks: Models, challenges and research opportunities , 2012 .

[19]  Enrique F. Castillo,et al.  Traffic Estimation and Optimal Counting Location Without Path Enumeration Using Bayesian Networks , 2008, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[20]  Yongxi Huang,et al.  Heterogeneous sensor location model for path reconstruction , 2016 .

[21]  Manwo Ng Synergistic sensor location for link flow inference without path enumeration: A node-based approach , 2012 .

[22]  T. Neumann Computers And Intractability A Guide To The Theory Of Np Completeness , 2016 .

[23]  Hai Yang,et al.  Optimal traffic counting locations for origin–destination matrix estimation , 1998 .