Training generalized spatial skills

Spatial transformation skills are an essential aspect of cognitive ability. These skills can be improved by practice, but such improvement has usually been specific to tasks and stimuli. The present study investigated whether intensive long-term practice leads to change that transcends stimulus and task parameters. Thirty-one participants (14 male, 17 female) were tested on three cognitive tasks: a computerized version of the Shepard-Metzler (1971) mental rotation task (MRT), a mental paper-folding task (MPFT), and a verbal analogies task (VAT). Each individual then participated in daily practice sessions with the MRT or the MPFT over 21 days. Postpractice comparisons revealed transfer of practice gains to novel stimuli for the practiced task, as well as transfer to the other, nonpracticed spatial task. Thus, practice effects were process based, not instance based. Improvement in the nonpracticed spatial task was greater than that in the VAT; thus, improvement was not merely due to greater ease with computerized testing.

[1]  R. Shepard,et al.  Mental Rotation of Three-Dimensional Objects , 1971, Science.

[2]  R. Shepard,et al.  A chronometric study of mental paper folding , 1972 .

[3]  R. Shepard,et al.  CHRONOMETRIC STUDIES OF THE ROTATION OF MENTAL IMAGES , 1973 .

[4]  W. Chase,et al.  Visual information processing. , 1974 .

[5]  A. Stericker,et al.  Effect of brief training on sex-related differences in visual-spatial skill. , 1982, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  D. Halpern Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities , 1986 .

[7]  R. Kail,et al.  The impact of extended practice on rate of mental rotation. , 1986, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[8]  C. E. Bethell-Fox,et al.  Mental rotation: effects of stimulus complexity and familiarity , 1988 .

[9]  N. Newcombe,et al.  The role of experience in spatial test performance: A meta-analysis , 1989 .

[10]  Benjamin Wallace,et al.  Process generalization and the prediction of performance on mental imagery tasks , 1992, Memory & cognition.

[11]  Diane F. Halpern,et al.  Sex differences in cognitive abilities, 2nd ed. , 1992 .

[12]  J. Droulez,et al.  The influence of long-term practice on mental rotation of 3-D objects. , 1993, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[13]  Richard De Lisi,et al.  Computer experience and gender differences in undergraduate mental rotation performance , 1996 .

[14]  F. Rösler,et al.  What is improved if a mental rotation task is repeated – the efficiency of memory access, or the speed of a transformation routine? , 1998, Psychological research.

[15]  R. Mayer,et al.  Domain specificity of spatial expertise: The case of video game players. , 2002 .

[16]  Susan M. Barnett,et al.  When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. , 2002, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  Daniel C. Krawczyk,et al.  A Neurocomputational Model of Analogical Reasoning and its Breakdown in Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  Brice Isableu,et al.  Embodied spatial transformations: "body analogy" for the mental rotation of objects. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[19]  Joo-Seok Hyun,et al.  Visual working memory as the substrate for mental rotation. , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[20]  Avi Pfeffer,et al.  INFLUENCE OF , 2014 .

[21]  N. Newcombe,et al.  Durable and generalized effects of spatial experience on mental rotation: gender differences in growth patterns , 2008 .

[22]  M. Peters,et al.  Applications of mental rotation figures of the Shepard and Metzler type and description of a mental rotation stimulus library , 2008, Brain and Cognition.