Designing occupancy studies: general advice and allocating survey effort

Summary 1 The fraction of sampling units in a landscape where a target species is present (occupancy) is an extensively used concept in ecology. Yet in many applications the species will not always be detected in a sampling unit even when present, resulting in biased estimates of occupancy. Given that sampling units are surveyed repeatedly within a relatively short timeframe, a number of similar methods have now been developed to provide unbiased occupancy estimates. However, practical guidance on the efficient design of occupancy studies has been lacking. 2 In this paper we comment on a number of general issues related to designing occupancy studies, including the need for clear objectives that are explicitly linked to science or management, selection of sampling units, timing of repeat surveys and allocation of survey effort. Advice on the number of repeat surveys per sampling unit is considered in terms of the variance of the occupancy estimator, for three possible study designs. 3 We recommend that sampling units should be surveyed a minimum of three times when detection probability is high (> 0·5 survey−1), unless a removal design is used. 4 We found that an optimal removal design will generally be the most efficient, but we suggest it may be less robust to assumption violations than a standard design. 5 Our results suggest that for a rare species it is more efficient to survey more sampling units less intensively, while for a common species fewer sampling units should be surveyed more intensively. 6 Synthesis and applications. Reliable inferences can only result from quality data. To make the best use of logistical resources, study objectives must be clearly defined; sampling units must be selected, and repeated surveys timed appropriately; and a sufficient number of repeated surveys must be conducted. Failure to do so may compromise the integrity of the study. The guidance given here on study design issues is particularly applicable to studies of species occurrence and distribution, habitat selection and modelling, metapopulation studies and monitoring programmes.

[1]  A. Guisan,et al.  An improved approach for predicting the distribution of rare and endangered species from occurrence and pseudo-absence data , 2004 .

[2]  I. Hanski.  A Practical Model of Metapopulation Dynamics , 1994 .

[3]  D. MacKenzie.  Modeling the Probability of Resource Use: The Effect of, and Dealing with, Detecting a Species Imperfectly , 2006 .

[4]  Howard B. Stauffer,et al.  29 Incorporating Detection Uncertainty into Presence-Absence Surveys for Marbled Murrelet , 2002 .

[5]  Howard B. Stauffer,et al.  Monitoring Martes Populations in California: Survey Design and Power Analysis , 1996 .

[6]  N. Yoccoz.  Occupancy Estimation and Modeling. Inferring patterns and dynamics of species occurrence , 2006 .

[7]  Howard B. Stauffer,et al.  RANKING HABITAT FOR MARBLED MURRELETS: NEW CONSERVATION APPROACH FOR SPECIES WITH UNCERTAIN DETECTION , 2004 .

[8]  N. Gotelli.  Predicting Species Occurrences: Issues of Accuracy and Scale , 2003 .

[9]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Combining probabilities of occurrence with spatial reserve design , 2004 .

[10]  Barry R. Noon,et al.  Estimating the occupancy of spotted owl habitat areas by sampling and adjusting for bias , 1990 .

[11]  D. MacKenzie.  WHAT ARE THE ISSUES WITH PRESENCE–ABSENCE DATA FOR WILDLIFE MANAGERS? , 2005 .

[12]  K. Pollock,et al.  ESTIMATING SITE OCCUPANCY AND SPECIES DETECTION PROBABILITY PARAMETERS FOR TERRESTRIAL SALAMANDERS , 2004 .

[13]  Maliha S. Nash,et al.  HABITAT PATCH OCCUPANCY BY TOADS (BUFO PUNCTATUS) IN A NATURALLY FRAGMENTED DESERT LANDSCAPE , 2003 .

[14]  Kenneth H. Pollock,et al.  Large scale wildlife monitoring studies: statistical methods for design and analysis , 2002 .

[15]  Lesley Gibson,et al.  Spatial prediction of rufous bristlebird habitat in a coastal heathland: a GIS-based approach , 2004 .

[16]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Implications of empirical data quality to metapopulation model parameter estimation and application , 2002 .

[17]  J. Gamarra,et al.  Metapopulation Ecology , 2007 .

[18]  M. R. Fuller,et al.  Estimation of the proportion of an area occupied by an animal species , 1986 .

[19]  R. Swihart,et al.  Absent or undetected? Effects of non-detection of species occurrence on wildlife-habitat models , 2004 .

[20]  M. Conroy,et al.  Analysis and Management of Animal Populations , 2002 .

[21]  Peter C. Trenham,et al.  REGIONAL DYNAMICS OF WETLAND‐BREEDING FROGS AND TOADS: TURNOVER AND SYNCHRONY , 2003 .

[22]  James D. Nichols,et al.  Statistical concepts: Assessing spatial distributions , 2002 .

[23]  H. Possingham,et al.  IMPROVING PRECISION AND REDUCING BIAS IN BIOLOGICAL SURVEYS: ESTIMATING FALSE‐NEGATIVE ERROR RATES , 2003 .

[24]  J. Nichols,et al.  Investigating species co-occurrence patterns when species are detected imperfectly , 2004 .

[25]  Christopher K. Wikle,et al.  Hierarchical Bayesian Models for Predicting The Spread of Ecological Processes , 2003 .

[26]  Kae Kawanishi,et al.  Conservation status of tigers in a primary rainforest of Peninsular Malaysia , 2004 .

[27]  Darryl I. MacKenzie,et al.  WAS IT THERE? DEALING WITH IMPERFECT DETECTION FOR SPECIES PRESENCE/ABSENCE DATA † , 2005 .

[28]  J. Nichols,et al.  ESTIMATING SITE OCCUPANCY, COLONIZATION, AND LOCAL EXTINCTION WHEN A SPECIES IS DETECTED IMPERFECTLY , 2003 .

[29]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  ESTIMATING ABUNDANCE FROM REPEATED PRESENCE–ABSENCE DATA OR POINT COUNTS , 2003 .

[30]  James D. Nichols,et al.  Monitoring of biological diversity in space and time , 2001 .

[31]  Vesa Nivala,et al.  PREDICTING OCCUPANCY FOR THE SIBERIAN FLYING SQUIRREL IN OLD-GROWTH FOREST PATCHES , 2002 .

[32]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  ESTIMATING SITE OCCUPANCY RATES WHEN DETECTION PROBABILITIES ARE LESS THAN ONE , 2002, Ecology.

[33]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations , 1980 .

[34]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Occupancy estimation and modeling for rare and elusive populations , 2004 .

[35]  Urs Hintermann,et al.  Scale and trends in species richness: considerations for monitoring biological diversity for political purposes , 2004 .

[36]  SCOTT A. FIELD,et al.  OPTIMIZING ALLOCATION OF MONITORING EFFORT UNDER ECONOMIC AND OBSERVATIONAL CONSTRAINTS , 2005 .