Microcephaly epidemic related to the Zika virus and living conditions in Recife, Northeast Brazil

BackgroundStarting in August 2015, there was an increase in the number of cases of neonatal microcephaly in Northeast Brazil. These findings were identified as being an epidemic of microcephaly related to Zika virus (ZIKV) infection. The present study aims to analyse the spatial distribution of microcephaly cases in Recife (2015–2016), which is in Northeast Brazil, and its association with the living conditions in this city.MethodsThis was an ecological study that used data from reported cases of microcephaly from the State Health Department of Pernambuco (August 2015 to July 2016). The basic spatial unit of analysis was the 94 districts of Recife. The case definition of microcephaly was: neonates with a head circumference of less than the cut-off point of −2 standard deviations below the mean value from the established Fenton growth curve. As an indicator of the living conditions of the 94 districts, the percentage of heads of households with an income of less than twice the minimum wage was calculated. The districts were classified into four homogeneous strata using the K-means clustering algorithm. We plotted the locations of each microcephaly case over a layer of living conditions.ResultsDuring the study period, 347 microcephaly cases were reported, of which 142 (40.9%) fulfilled the definition of a microcephaly case. Stratification of the 94 districts resulted in the identification of four strata. The highest stratum in relation to the living conditions presented the lowest prevalence rate of microcephaly, and the overall difference between this rate and the rates of the other strata was statistically significant. The results of the Kruskal-Wallis test demonstrated that there was a strong association between a higher prevalence of microcephaly and poor living conditions. After the first 6 months of the study period, there were no microcephaly cases recorded within the population living in the richest socio-economic strata.ConclusionThis study showed that those residing in areas with precarious living conditions had a higher prevalence of microcephaly compared with populations with better living conditions.

[1]  O. Dyer Zika virus spreads across Americas as concerns mount over birth defects , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  W. Lopes Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística - Concentração jurídica , 1957 .

[3]  Derek Gatherer,et al.  Zika virus: a previously slow pandemic spreads rapidly through the Americas. , 2016, The Journal of general virology.

[4]  A. Ross Possible association between Zika virus infection and microcephaly , 2016 .

[5]  M. Castro,et al.  Congenital Zika virus syndrome in Brazil: a case series of the first 1501 livebirths with complete investigation , 2016, The Lancet.

[6]  C. Bonfim,et al.  Burden of lymphatic filariasis morbidity in an area of low endemicity in Brazil. , 2016, Acta tropica.

[7]  M. Barreto,et al.  Successes and failures in the control of infectious diseases in Brazil: social and environmental context, policies, interventions, and research needs , 2011, The Lancet.

[8]  Paulo J Ribeiro,et al.  An entomological surveillance system based on open spatial information for participative dengue control. , 2009, Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias.

[9]  Núcleo Ipê Ministério da Saúde confirma relação entre vírus Zika e microcefalia , 2016 .

[10]  K. Dabiré,et al.  Priorities and needs for research on urban interventions targeting vector-borne diseases: rapid review of scoping and systematic reviews , 2016, Infectious Diseases of Poverty.

[11]  L. Rodrigues,et al.  Microcephaly in Pernambuco State, Brazil: epidemiological characteristics and evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of cutoff points for reporting suspected cases. , 2016, Cadernos de saude publica.

[12]  Anil K. Jain Data clustering: 50 years beyond K-means , 2008, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[13]  L. R. Petersen,et al.  Zika Virus. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  Marli Tenório Cordeiro,et al.  Seroprevalence and risk factors for dengue infection in socio-economically distinct areas of Recife, Brazil. , 2010, Acta tropica.

[15]  Microcephaly in Infants, Pernambuco State, Brazil, 2015 , 2016, Emerging infectious diseases.

[16]  A. Furtado,et al.  [Epidemiological pattern of lymphatic filariasis in children living in endemic areas]. , 1997, Jornal de pediatria.

[17]  François Chappuis,et al.  Urbanisation and infectious diseases in a globalised world , 2011, The Lancet Infectious Diseases.

[18]  S. Rasmussen,et al.  Zika Virus and Birth Defects--Reviewing the Evidence for Causality. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  Maria de Fátima Pessoa Militão de Albuquerque Urbanização, favelas e endemias: a produção da filariose no Recife, Brasil , 1993 .

[20]  E. Bloch,et al.  A Literature Review of Zika Virus , 2016, Emerging infectious diseases.

[21]  L. Rodrigues,et al.  Association between Zika virus infection and microcephaly in Brazil, January to May, 2016: preliminary report of a case-control study. , 2016, The Lancet. Infectious diseases.

[22]  Duncan R. Smith,et al.  Zika virus: history of a newly emerging arbovirus. , 2016, The Lancet. Infectious diseases.

[23]  L. Schuler‐Faccini,et al.  Possible Association Between Zika Virus Infection and Microcephaly - Brazil, 2015. , 2016, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[24]  J. Macinko,et al.  The Brazilian health system: history, advances, and challenges , 2011, The Lancet.

[25]  R. Lanciotti,et al.  Zika virus outbreak on Yap Island, Federated States of Micronesia. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.