Measuring the Diffusion of Innovative Health Promotion Programs

Once a health promotion program has proven to be effective in one or two initial settings, attempts may be made to transfer the program to new settings. One way to conceptualize the transference of health promotion programs from one locale to another is by considering the programs to be innovations that are being diffused. In this way, diffusion of innovation theory can be applied to guide the process of program transference. This article reports on the development of six questionnaires to measure the extent to which health promotion programs are successfully disseminated: Organizational Climate, Awareness-Concern, Rogers's Adoption Variables, Level of Use, Level of Success, and Level of Institutionalization. The instruments are being successfully used in a study of the diffusion of health promotion/tobacco prevention curricula to junior high schools in North Carolina. The instruments, which measure the four steps of the diffusion process, have construct validity since they were develóped within existing theories and are derived from the work of previous researchers. No previous research has attempted to use instruments like these to measure sequentially the stages of the diffusion process.

[1]  R. Goodman,et al.  Recruiting school districts into a dissemination study , 1991 .

[2]  Robert M. Goodman,et al.  A framework for assessing program institutionalization , 1989 .

[3]  Robert M. Goodman,et al.  A model for the institutionalization of health promotion programs , 1989 .

[4]  P. Hanson,et al.  Citizen Involvement in Community Health Promotion: A Role Application of CDC's Patch Model , 1988, International quarterly of community health education.

[5]  B R Flay,et al.  Affective and social influences approaches to the prevention of multiple substance abuse among seventh grade students: results from project SMART. , 1988, Preventive medicine.

[6]  D. Connell,et al.  Summary of findings of the School Health Education Evaluation: health promotion effectiveness, implementation, and costs. , 1985, The Journal of school health.

[7]  C. Basch Research on disseminating and implementing health education programs in schools. , 1984, The Journal of school health.

[8]  Janice M. Beyer,et al.  Implementing Change: Alcoholism Policies in Work Organizations , 1978 .

[9]  A. Greer Advances in the study of diffusion of innovation in health care organizations. , 1977, The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly. Health and society.

[10]  H Labelle,et al.  A new perspective on the health of Canadians. , 1976, AARN news letter.

[11]  J. W. Gardner,et al.  Health, Education, and Welfare. , 1965, Science.

[12]  M. Orlandi Promoting health and preventing disease in health care settings: an analysis of barriers. , 1987, Preventive medicine.

[13]  Gene E. Hall,et al.  Change in Schools: Facilitating the Process. SUNY Series in Educational Leadership. , 1987 .

[14]  J E Fielding,et al.  Health promotion and disease prevention at the worksite. , 1984, Annual review of public health.

[15]  C. Basch,et al.  Research on disseminating and implementing health education programs in schools. , 1984, Health education.

[16]  G. Hall Measuring Stages of Concern about the Innovation: A Manual for the Use of the SoC Questionnaire. , 1977 .

[17]  G. H. Litwin,et al.  Motivation and Organizational Climate , 1968 .