Using human physiology to evaluate subtle expressivity of a virtual quizmaster in a mathematical game

The aim of the experimental study described in this article is to investigate the effect of a lifelike character with subtle expressivity on the affective state of users. The character acts as a quizmaster in the context of a mathematical game. This application was chosen as a simple, and for the sake of the experiment, highly controllable, instance of human-computer interfaces and software. Subtle expressivity refers to the character's affective response to the user's performance by emulating multimodal human-human communicative behavior such as different body gestures and varying linguistic style. The impact of em-pathic behavior, which is a special form of affective response, is examined by deliberately frustrating the user during the game progress. There are two novel aspects in this investigation. First, we employ an animated interface agent to address the affective state of users rather than a text-based interface, which has been used in related research. Second, while previous empirical studies rely on questionnaires to evaluate the effect of life-like characters, we utilize physiological information of users (in addition to questionnaire data) in order to precisely associate the occurrence of interface events with users' autonomic nervous system activity. The results of our study indicate that empathic character response can significantly decrease user stress and that affective behavior may have a positive effect on users' perception of the difficulty of a task.

[1]  Rosalind W. Picard,et al.  Subtle Expressivity by Relational Agents , 2003 .

[2]  J. J. Jacobs,et al.  When a Car Makes You Smile: Development and Application of an Instrument to Measure Product Emotions , 2000 .

[3]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Direct manipulation vs. interface agents , 1997, INTR.

[4]  Mervyn A. Jack,et al.  Experimental assessment of the effectiveness of synthetic personae for multi-modal e-retail applications , 2000, AGENTS '00.

[5]  Mitsuru Ishizuka,et al.  Empathic Embodied Interfaces: Addressing Users' Affective State: Embodied Interfaces That Address Users' Physiological State , 2004, ADS.

[6]  HudlickaEva To feel or not to feel , 2003 .

[7]  A. Pope,et al.  Biocybernetic system evaluates indices of operator engagement in automated task , 1995, Biological Psychology.

[8]  R. Lawson Frustration : the development of a scientific concept , 1965 .

[9]  Thomas Rist,et al.  The PPP persona: a multipurpose animated presentation agent , 1996, AVI '96.

[10]  Mitsuru Ishizuka,et al.  Life-Like Characters , 2004, Cognitive Technologies.

[11]  John L. Arnott,et al.  Implementation and testing of a system for producing emotion-by-rule in synthetic speech , 1995, Speech Commun..

[12]  Justine Cassell,et al.  BEAT: the Behavior Expression Animation Toolkit , 2001, Life-like characters.

[13]  Cynthia LeRouge,et al.  Developing multimodal intelligent affective interfaces for tele-home health care , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[14]  Jennifer A. Healey,et al.  Wearable and automotive systems for affect recognition from physiology , 2000 .

[15]  M. Angela Sasse,et al.  Listen to Your Heart Rate: Counting the Cost of Media Quality , 1999, IWAI.

[16]  Rosalind W. Picard Toward computers that recognize and respond to user emotion , 2000, IBM Syst. J..

[17]  James C. Lester,et al.  The persona effect: affective impact of animated pedagogical agents , 1997, CHI.

[18]  Christoph Bartneck,et al.  Subtle expressivity for characters and robots , 2003, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[19]  Mitsuru Ishizuka,et al.  Life-like characters - tools, affective functions, and applications , 2004, Life-like characters.

[20]  Robert D. Ward,et al.  Physiological responses to different WEB page designs , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[21]  Jonathan Klein,et al.  This computer responds to user frustration: Theory, design, and results , 2002, Interact. Comput..

[22]  Elisabeth André,et al.  The Persona Effect: How Substantial Is It? , 1998, BCS HCI.

[23]  J. Allanson,et al.  Supporting the development of electrophysiologically interactive computer systems , 2000 .

[24]  R. Levenson Emotion and the autonomic nervous system: A prospectus for research on autonomic specificity. , 1988 .

[25]  Cristina Conati,et al.  Probabilistic assessment of user's emotions in educational games , 2002, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[26]  Carla H. Lagorio,et al.  Psychology , 1929, Nature.

[27]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[28]  Ana Paiva,et al.  Affective Interactions: Toward a New Generation of Computer Interfaces? , 2000, IWAI.

[29]  Eva Hudlicka,et al.  To feel or not to feel: The role of affect in human-computer interaction , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[30]  A. Pecchinenda The Affective Significance of Skin Conductance Activity During a Difficult Problem-solving Task , 1996 .

[31]  Mitsuru Ishizuka,et al.  MPML: A Multimodal Presentation Markup Language with Character Agent Control Functions , 2000, WebNet.

[32]  Rosalind W. Picard Affective Computing , 1997 .

[33]  J. Russell,et al.  The Structure of Current Affect , 1999 .

[34]  P. Lang The emotion probe. Studies of motivation and attention. , 1995, The American psychologist.

[35]  Mitsuru Ishizuka,et al.  Persona Effect Revisited --- Using Bio-signals to Measure and Reflect the Impact of Character-bas , 2003 .