Object individuation and event mapping: developmental changes in infants' use of featural information

The present research examined the development of 4.5- to 7.5-month-old infants’ ability to map different-features occlusion events using a simplified event-mapping task. In this task, infants saw a different-features (i.e. egg-column) event followed by a display containing either one object or two objects. Experiments 1 and 2 assessed infants’ ability to judge whether the eggcolumn event was consistent with a subsequent one-column display. Experiments 3 and 4 examined infants’ ability to judge whether the objects seen in the egg-column event and those seen in a subsequent display were consistent in their featural composition. At 7.5 and 5.5 months, but not at 4.5 months, the infants successfully mapped the egg-column event onto the onecolumn display. However, the 7.5- and 5.5-month-olds differed in whether they mapped the featural properties of those objects. Whereas the 7.5-month-olds responded as if they expected to see two specific objects, an egg and a column, in the final display the 5.5-month-olds responded as if they simply expected to see ‘two objects’. Additional results revealed, however, that when spatiotemporal information specified the presence of two objects, 5.5-month-olds succeeded at tagging the objects as being featurally distinct, although they still failed to attach more specific information about what those differences were. Reasons for why the younger infants had difficulty integrating featural information into their object representations were discussed.

[1]  J. Fagan,et al.  Infant recognition memory: the effects of length of familiarization and type of discrimination task. , 1974, Child development.

[2]  A. Treisman Focused attention in the perception and retrieval of multidimensional stimuli , 1977 .

[3]  J. Fagan Infant recognition memory: studies in forgetting. , 1977, Child development.

[4]  E. H. Cornell,et al.  Infants' recognition memory, forgetting, and savings. , 1979, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[5]  Leslie G. Ungerleider Two cortical visual systems , 1982 .

[6]  A. Gottfried,et al.  FAMILIARITY AND NOVELTY PREFERENCES IN INFANT RECOGNITION MEMORY: IMPLICATIONS FOR INFORMATION PROCESSING , 1982 .

[7]  A. Treisman Features and Objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture , 1988, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[8]  Renée Baillargeon,et al.  Why do young infants fail to search for hidden objects? , 1990, Cognition.

[9]  D. Kahneman,et al.  The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  Karen Wynn,et al.  Addition and subtraction by human infants , 1992, Nature.

[11]  E. Spelke,et al.  Origins of knowledge. , 1992, Psychological review.

[12]  E. Spelke,et al.  Spatiotemporal continuity, smoothness of motion and object identity in infancy , 1995 .

[13]  A. Treisman The binding problem , 1996, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[14]  L. Nadel,et al.  Location memory in healthy preterm and full-term infants , 1996 .

[15]  S. Carey,et al.  Infants’ Metaphysics: The Case of Numerical Identity , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  R. Baillargeon,et al.  Object individuation in young infants: Further evidence with an event‐monitoring paradigm , 1998 .

[17]  R. Baillargeon,et al.  Object Individuation in Infancy: The Use of Featural Information in Reasoning about Occlusion Events , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al.  Indexing and the object concept: developing `what' and `where' systems , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[19]  B. Scholl,et al.  Explaining the infant''s object concept: Beyond the perception/cognition dichotomy , 1999 .

[20]  T. Wilcox Object individuation: infants’ use of shape, size, pattern, and color , 1999, Cognition.

[21]  S. Carey,et al.  The emergence of kind concepts: a rejoinder to Needham and Baillargeon (2000) , 2000, Cognition.

[22]  Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al.  Infant individuation and identification of objects , 2000 .

[23]  T. Wilcox,et al.  Infants' reasoning about opaque and transparent occluders in an individuation task , 2002, Cognition.

[24]  R. Baillargeon,et al.  Developments in young infants' reasoning about occluded objects , 2002, Cognitive Psychology.

[25]  Zsuzsa Kaldy,et al.  Identification of objects in 9‐month‐old infants: integrating ‘what’ and ‘where’ information , 2003 .

[26]  Teresa Wilcox,et al.  Infants' use of speed information to individuate objects in occlusion events , 2003 .

[27]  T. Wilcox,et al.  Priming infants to attend to color and pattern information in an individuation task , 2004, Cognition.