Economy of Hand Motion During Cleft Palate Surgery Using a High-Fidelity Cleft Palate Simulator

Objective: The objectives of this study were to assess economy of hand motion of residents, fellows, and staff surgeons using a high-fidelity cleft palate simulator to (1) stratify performance for the purpose of simulator validation and (2) to estimate the learning curve. Design: Two residents, 2 fellows, and 2 staff surgeons performed cleft palate surgery on a high-fidelity cleft palate simulator while their hand motion was tracked using an electromagnetic hand sensor. The time, number of hand movements, and path length of their hands were determined for 10 steps of the procedure. The magnitude of these metrics was compared among the 3 groups of participants and utilized to estimate the learning curve using curve-fitting analysis. Results: The residents required the most time, number of hand movements, and path length to complete the procedure. Although the number of hand movements was closely matched between the fellows and staff, the overall total path length was shorter for the staff. Inverse curves were fit to the data to represent the learning curve and 25 and 113 simulation sessions are required to reach within 5% and 1% of the expert level, respectively. Conclusion: The simulator successfully stratified performance using economy of hand motion. Path length is better matched to previous level of experience compared to time or number of hand movements.

[1]  Richard H M Goossens,et al.  Face, content, and construct validity of a novel portable ergonomic simulator for basic laparoscopic skills. , 2014, Journal of surgical education.

[2]  Ethan D Grober,et al.  Validation of novel and objective measures of microsurgical skill: Hand‐motion analysis and stereoscopic visual acuity , 2003, Microsurgery.

[3]  Makoto Hashizume,et al.  Objective assessment of laparoscopic suturing skills using a motion-tracking system , 2011, Surgical Endoscopy.

[4]  A Alvand,et al.  Evidence-based surgical training in orthopaedics: how many arthroscopies of the knee are needed to achieve consultant level performance? , 2015, The bone & joint journal.

[5]  Dale J. Podolsky,et al.  Infant Robotic Cleft Palate Surgery: A Feasibility Assessment Using a Realistic Cleft Palate Simulator , 2017, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[6]  Ara Darzi,et al.  Electromagnetic motion analysis in the assessment of surgical skill: Relationship between time and movement , 2002, ANZ journal of surgery.

[7]  Dale J. Podolsky,et al.  Assessing Technical Performance and Determining the Learning Curve in Cleft Palate Surgery Using a High-Fidelity Cleft Palate Simulator , 2018, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[8]  Robert S. Huckman,et al.  A Detailed Analysis of the Reduction Mammaplasty Learning Curve: A Statistical Process Model for Approaching Surgical Performance Improvement , 2009, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[9]  Timothy M. Kowalewski,et al.  Content and construct validation of a robotic surgery curriculum using an electromagnetic instrument tracker. , 2012, Journal of Urology.

[10]  A. Moinzadeh,et al.  Face, content, and construct validity of dV-trainer, a novel virtual reality simulator for robotic surgery. , 2009, Urology.

[11]  Ethan D Grober,et al.  Intraoperative assessment of technical skills on live patients using economy of hand motion: establishing learning curves of surgical competence. , 2010, American journal of surgery.

[12]  R. Aggarwal,et al.  Assessing Technical Competence in Surgical Trainees: A Systematic Review. , 2015, Annals of surgery.

[13]  R. Vaz,et al.  Learning curve and complications of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. , 2013, Neurosurgical focus.

[14]  Veronica J Santos,et al.  Surgical Hand Tracking in Open Surgery Using a Versatile Motion Sensing System: Are We There Yet? , 2016, The American surgeon.

[15]  Kern Singh,et al.  Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: The Surgical Learning Curve , 2016, Spine.

[16]  M. Haapanen,et al.  The correlation between training and skill of the surgeon and reoperation rate for persistent cleft palate speech. , 1995, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[17]  R. Reznick,et al.  Teaching surgical skills--changes in the wind. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  Dale J. Podolsky,et al.  Evaluation and Implementation of a High-Fidelity Cleft Palate Simulator , 2017, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[19]  Iman Ghaderi,et al.  Technical skills assessment toolbox: a review using the unitary framework of validity. , 2015, Annals of surgery.

[20]  Dale J. Podolsky,et al.  Teaching Palatoplasty Using a High-Fidelity Cleft Palate Simulator , 2018, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[21]  T. Pilgram,et al.  The Effect of Surgeon Experience on Velopharyngeal Functional Outcome following Palatoplasty: Is There a Learning Curve? , 1998, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[22]  Rod J. Rohrich,et al.  Incidence of Cleft Palate Fistula: An Institutional Experience with Two‐Stage Palatal Repair , 2001, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.