Influence of Various Design Parameters on Compressive Strength of Geopolymer Concrete: A Parametric study by Taguchi Method

Global warming is one of the severe environmental effects, which are faced by the current generation. Studies show that Carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) is the major cause of global warming and is mainly due to the huge production of Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC). Supplementary cementitious materials can reduce this effect by reducing the required materials instead of OPC for construction purposes. Geopolymer Concrete (GPC) is a new generation concrete, which does not require OPC. In this study, Fly Ash (FA) was used to produce GPC. Various parameters were considered and the design of the experiment was made using Taguchi’s method and developed an empirical relation to predicting the compressive strength of GPC based on the different parameters. Thirty-six mixes were cast to determine the effect of curing temperature, curing time, rest period, the ratio of Alkaline Activator solutions (AAs), ratio of activators to FA, the molarity of NaOH and replacement level of FA with OPC on the compressive strength. The contribution of each parameter was estimated by ANOVA. Results show that the addition of OPC had a significant effect on the compressive strength of GPC. The mix with 20% OPC, 14M NaOH, curing temperature of 60 o C, curing time of 36h, a rest period of 48h, AAs to FA ratio 0.3 and ratio of alkaline solutions 2.5 was found to have the maximum compressive strength. A regression equation is developed to determine the compressive strength of GPC concerning the parameters considered.

[1]  Y. Mohammadi,et al.  Evaluation of the Combined Use of Waste Paper Sludge Ash and Nanomaterials on Mechanical Properties and Durability of High Strength Concretes , 2021, International Journal of Engineering.

[2]  G. Seck,et al.  The impact of future power generation on cement demand: An international and regional assessment based on climate scenarios , 2020 .

[3]  A. Yahia,et al.  Effect of viscosity and shear regime on stability of the air-void system in self-consolidating concrete using Taguchi method , 2020 .

[4]  D. Panesar,et al.  Performance comparison of cement replacing materials in concrete: Limestone fillers and supplementary cementing materials – A review , 2020 .

[5]  Z. Hassan,et al.  Optimizing the Properties of Metakaolin-based (Na, K)-Geopolymer Using Taguchi Design Method , 2020 .

[6]  Seyed Jafar Sadjadi,et al.  Optimization of high-strength self-consolidating concrete mix design using an improved Taguchi optimization method , 2020 .

[7]  Kejin Wang,et al.  Effects of mix design parameters on heat of geopolymerization, set time, and compressive strength of high calcium fly ash geopolymer , 2019 .

[8]  B. Jindal,et al.  Investigations on the properties of geopolymer mortar and concrete with mineral admixtures: A review , 2019 .

[9]  Amer Hassan,et al.  Effect of curing condition on the mechanical properties of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete , 2019, SN Applied Sciences.

[10]  Prince Arulraj,et al.  Experimental investigation of mechanical properties and physical characteristics of concrete under standard fire exposure , 2019, Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology.

[11]  Haiqiu Zhang,et al.  Optimum mix design of geopolymer pastes and concretes cured in ambient condition based on compressive strength, setting time and workability , 2019, Journal of Building Engineering.

[12]  Zhong Tao,et al.  Effect of calcium aluminate cement on geopolymer concrete cured at ambient temperature , 2018, Construction and Building Materials.

[13]  Bijan Samali,et al.  Mechanical properties of ambient cured one-part hybrid OPC-geopolymer concrete , 2018, Construction and Building Materials.

[14]  Grzegorz Łagód,et al.  Influence of various parameters on strength and absorption properties of fly ash based geopolymer concrete designed by Taguchi method , 2017 .

[15]  Rafat Siddique,et al.  Properties of low-calcium fly ash based geopolymer concrete incorporating OPC as partial replacement of fly ash , 2017 .

[16]  Muhammad N. S Hadi,et al.  Design of geopolymer concrete with GGBFS at ambient curing condition using Taguchi method , 2017 .

[17]  Harun Tanyildizi,et al.  Taguchi optimization approach for the polypropylene fiber reinforced concrete strengthening with polymer after high temperature , 2017 .

[18]  Ahmed S. Eisa,et al.  Mechanical properties of fly ash based geopolymer concrete with full and partial cement replacement , 2016 .

[19]  Ali A. Aliabdo,et al.  Effect of cement addition, solution resting time and curing characteristics on fly ash based geopolymer concrete performance , 2016 .

[20]  Paul Ziehl,et al.  Improvement of the early and final compressive strength of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete at ambient conditions , 2016 .

[21]  Ali A. Aliabdo,et al.  Effect of water addition, plasticizer and alkaline solution constitution on fly ash based geopolymer concrete performance , 2016 .

[22]  C. Atiş,et al.  Very high strength (120 MPa) class F fly ash geopolymer mortar activated at different NaOH amount, heat curing temperature and heat curing duration , 2015 .

[23]  Bhupinder Singh,et al.  Geopolymer concrete: A review of some recent developments , 2015 .

[24]  Prabir Sarker,et al.  Effect of GGBFS on setting, workability and early strength properties of fly ash geopolymer concrete cured in ambient condition , 2014 .

[25]  F. Collins,et al.  Carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-e) emissions: A comparison between geopolymer and OPC cement concrete , 2013 .

[26]  D. Hardjito,et al.  Strength and Setting Times of Low Calcium Fly Ash-based Geopolymer Mortar , 2008 .

[27]  B. Vijaya Rangan,et al.  Mix Design of Fly Ash Based Geopolymer Concrete , 2015 .