Empirical channel model for unattended near ground sensor networks at UHF

Recently, unattended near ground wireless sensor networks are attracting increasing attention. The number of sensors needed to cover a certain area is of prime importance and therefore an accurate channel model is needed, especially to evaluate the maximum effective distance between adjacent terminals. In this paper, results of a measurements campaign performed in two environments, flat open yard and sandy dunes with bushes, are presented. Narrowband (NB) and wideband (WB) measurements at 916 MHz were conducted. The measured received power was compared with two ground wave prediction models. Additionally, we found that change of ground type leads to significant changes in both path loss and antenna gain. Based on the NB measurements we found a good match between predicted and measured received power values, and the predicted received power reflects the physical path profile. Based on the WB measurements we found that over flat open yard the channel can be classified as flat fading channel, while over sandy dunes with bushes the channel is rather frequency-selective with a coherence bandwidth of ~20MHz. Moreover, the temporal variations of the transfer function are negligible even though there was moderate wind during the measurements.

[1]  M. Levy.  Parabolic Equation Methods for Electromagnetic Wave Propagation , 2000 .

[2]  Jeff Frolik,et al.  Effects of natural propagation environments on wireless sensor network coverage area , 2003, Proceedings of the 35th Southeastern Symposium on System Theory, 2003..

[3]  Gregory J. Pottie,et al.  Pico Wireless Integrated Network Sensors (PicoWINS): Investigating the Feasibility of Wireless Tactical Tags , 2002 .

[4]  John L. Volakis,et al.  Antenna Engineering Handbook , 2007 .

[5]  Yan Wu,et al.  Wireless sensor network: Water distribution monitoring system , 2008, 2008 IEEE Radio and Wireless Symposium.

[6]  O. P. Gandhi,et al.  MONOPOLE ANTENNAS , 2003 .

[7]  D. J. Cichon,et al.  Comments on the COST-231 document (93)6: comparison between different path loss prediction models , 1993 .

[8]  G. D. Dockery.  Modeling electromagnetic wave propagation in the troposphere using the parabolic equation , 1988 .

[9]  A. Barrios.  A terrain parabolic equation model for propagation in the troposphere , 1994 .

[10]  G. Pottie,et al.  Near ground wideband channel measurement in 800-1000 MHz , 1999, 1999 IEEE 49th Vehicular Technology Conference (Cat. No.99CH36363).

[11]  K. Norton.  The Propagation of Radio Waves over the Surface of the Earth and in the Upper Atmosphere , 1936, Proceedings of the Institute of Radio Engineers.

[12]  L. Barclay.  Propagation of radiowaves , 2003 .

[13]  H. Plendl.  Concerning the Influence of the Eleven-Year Solar Activity Period upon the Propagation of Waves in Wireless Telegraphy , 1932, Proceedings of the Institute of Radio Engineers.

[14]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Sensor Networks , 2002, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[15]  K. Sohrabi,et al.  Quantifying short-range surface-to-surface communications links , 2004, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine.

[16]  Sherman W. Marcus.  A hybrid (finite difference-surface Green's function) method for computing transmission losses in an inhomogeneous atmosphere over irregular terrain , 1992 .

[17]  A. Sommerfeld.  Über die Ausbreitung der Wellen in der drahtlosen Telegraphie , 1909 .