Modular nanotransporters: a multipurpose in vivo working platform for targeted drug delivery

Background Modular nanotransporters (MNT) are recombinant multifunctional polypeptides created to exploit a cascade of cellular processes, initiated with membrane receptor recognition to deliver selective short-range and highly cytotoxic therapeutics to the cell nucleus. This research was designed for in vivo concept testing for this drug delivery platform using two modular nanotransporters, one targeted to the α-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (αMSH) receptor overexpressed on melanoma cells and the other to the epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor overexpressed on several cancers, including glioblastoma, and head-and-neck and breast carcinoma cells. Methods In vivo targeting of the modular nanotransporter was determined by immuno-fluorescence confocal laser scanning microscopy and by accumulation of 125I-labeled modular nanotransporters. The in vivo therapeutic effects of the modular nanotransporters were assessed by photodynamic therapy studies, given that the cytotoxicity of photosensitizers is critically dependent on their delivery to the cell nucleus. Results Immunohistochemical analyses of tumor and neighboring normal tissues of mice injected with multifunctional nanotransporters demonstrated preferential uptake in tumor tissue, particularly in cell nuclei. With 125I-labeled MNT{αMSH}, optimal tumor:muscle and tumor:skin ratios of 8:1 and 9.8:1, respectively, were observed 3 hours after injection in B16-F1 melanoma-bearing mice. Treatment with bacteriochlorin p-MNT{αMSH} yielded 89%–98% tumor growth inhibition and a two-fold increase in survival for mice with B16-F1 and Cloudman S91 melanomas. Likewise, treatment of A431 human epidermoid carcinoma-bearing mice with chlorin e6- MNT{EGF} resulted in 94% tumor growth inhibition compared with free chlorin e6, with 75% of animals surviving at 3 months compared with 0% and 20% for untreated and free chlorin e6-treated groups, respectively. Conclusion The multifunctional nanotransporter approach provides a new in vivo functional platform for drug development that could, in principle, be applicable to any combination of cell surface receptor and agent (photosensitizers, oligonucleotides, radionuclides) requiring nuclear delivery to achieve maximum effectiveness.

[1]  E. Kim Monoclonal Antibody and Peptide-Targeted Radiotherapy of Cancer , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[2]  V. Tolmachev,et al.  Use of a HEHEHE purification tag instead of a hexahistidine tag improves biodistribution of affibody molecules site-specifically labeled with (99m)Tc, (111)In, and (125)I. , 2011, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[3]  Britton Chance,et al.  Evaluation of bacteriochlorophyll-reconstituted low-density lipoprotein nanoparticles for photodynamic therapy efficacy in vivo. , 2011, Nanomedicine.

[4]  R. Jain,et al.  Delivering nanomedicine to solid tumors , 2010, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[5]  S. Nie,et al.  A reexamination of active and passive tumor targeting by using rod-shaped gold nanocrystals and covalently conjugated peptide ligands. , 2010, ACS nano.

[6]  M. Pautler,et al.  Nanomedicine: promises and challenges for the future of public health , 2010, International journal of nanomedicine.

[7]  James H. Adair,et al.  Nanoparticulate alternatives for drug delivery. , 2010, ACS nano.

[8]  A. Kassis,et al.  Targeted Auger Electron Radiotherapy of Malignancies , 2010 .

[9]  Borries Demeler,et al.  Assembly Mechanism of the Sixty-Subunit Nanoparticles via Interaction of RNA with the Reengineered Protein Connector of phi29 DNA-Packaging Motor , 2010, ACS nano.

[10]  A. Chilkoti,et al.  Morphing low-affinity ligands into high-avidity nanoparticles by thermally triggered self-assembly of a genetically encoded polymer. , 2010, ACS nano.

[11]  Michael Schmidt,et al.  Structural-mechanical characterization of nanoparticle exosomes in human saliva, using correlative AFM, FESEM, and force spectroscopy. , 2010, ACS nano.

[12]  Ingo Köper,et al.  Reusable localized surface plasmon sensors based on ultrastable nanostructures. , 2010, Small.

[13]  Mark E. Davis,et al.  Mechanism of active targeting in solid tumors with transferrin-containing gold nanoparticles , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  R. Mahato,et al.  Pharmaceutical perspectives of cancer therapeutics , 2009 .

[15]  Michael M. Schmidt,et al.  A modeling analysis of the effects of molecular size and binding affinity on tumor targeting , 2009, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[16]  G. Miotto,et al.  A novel boronated-porphyrin as a radio-sensitizing agent for boron neutron capture therapy of tumours: in vitro and in vivo studies. , 2009, Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine.

[17]  P. Couvreur,et al.  Nanocarriers’ entry into the cell: relevance to drug delivery , 2009, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[18]  Mark E. Davis,et al.  Nanoparticle therapeutics: an emerging treatment modality for cancer , 2008, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[19]  A. S. Sobolev,et al.  Engineered modular recombinant transporters: application of new platform for targeted radiotherapeutic agents to alpha-particle emitting 211 At. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  Malini Olivo,et al.  Improved formulation of photosensitizer chlorin e6 polyvinylpyrrolidone for fluorescence diagnostic imaging and photodynamic therapy of human cancer. , 2008, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V.

[21]  A. S. Sobolev,et al.  Modular drug transporters with diphtheria toxin translocation domain form edged holes in lipid membranes. , 2008, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[22]  A. S. Sobolev Modular transporters for subcellular cell-specific targeting of anti-tumor drugs. , 2008, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[23]  G. Miotto,et al.  Tumour-localizing and -photosensitising properties of meso-tetra(4-nido-carboranylphenyl)porphyrin (H2TCP). , 2007, Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology.

[24]  Wolfgang A. Weber,et al.  Impact of tumor-specific targeting on the biodistribution and efficacy of siRNA nanoparticles measured by multimodality in vivo imaging , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  T. Hasan,et al.  Strategies for Enhanced Photodynamic Therapy Effects † , 2007, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[26]  R. Reilly,et al.  111In-Labeled Trastuzumab (Herceptin) Modified with Nuclear Localization Sequences (NLS): An Auger Electron-Emitting Radiotherapeutic Agent for HER2/neu-Amplified Breast Cancer , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[27]  H. Mojzisova,et al.  The pH-dependent distribution of the photosensitizer chlorin e6 among plasma proteins and membranes: a physico-chemical approach. , 2007, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[28]  A. Wu,et al.  Radioiodinated versus radiometal-labeled anti-carcinoembryonic antigen single-chain Fv-Fc antibody fragments: optimal pharmacokinetics for therapy. , 2007, Cancer research.

[29]  A. S. Sobolev,et al.  Targeting cancer cells by novel engineered modular transporters. , 2006, Cancer research.

[30]  M. Zalutsky,et al.  Preparation of N-succinimidyl 3-[*I]iodobenzoate: an agent for the indirect radioiodination of proteins , 2006, Nature Protocols.

[31]  U. Nielsen,et al.  Antibody targeting of long-circulating lipidic nanoparticles does not increase tumor localization but does increase internalization in animal models. , 2006, Cancer research.

[32]  A. Saito,et al.  Footpad reaction induced by Neospora caninum tachyzoite extract in infected BALB/c mice. , 2006, Veterinary parasitology.

[33]  Paul Chen,et al.  Nuclear localizing sequences promote nuclear translocation and enhance the radiotoxicity of the anti-CD33 monoclonal antibody HuM195 labeled with 111In in human myeloid leukemia cells. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[34]  J. Richie,et al.  Targeted nanoparticle-aptamer bioconjugates for cancer chemotherapy in vivo. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  S. Emanuel,et al.  The in vitro and in vivo effects of JNJ-7706621: a dual inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases and aurora kinases. , 2005, Cancer research.

[36]  H. Benson,et al.  Comparison of Diafiltration and Tangential Flow Filtration for Purification of Nanoparticle Suspensions , 2005, Pharmaceutical Research.

[37]  A. S. Sobolev,et al.  Recombinant modular transporters on the basis of epidermal growth factor for targeted intracellular delivery of photosensitizers , 2005, Current Research on Laser Use in Oncology.

[38]  Stanley B. Brown,et al.  The present and future role of photodynamic therapy in cancer treatment. , 2004, The Lancet. Oncology.

[39]  J. Reubi Peptide receptors as molecular targets for cancer diagnosis and therapy. , 2003, Endocrine reviews.

[40]  A. S. Sobolev,et al.  Recombinant modular transporters for cell‐specific nuclear delivery of locally acting drugs enhance photosensitizer activity , 2003, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[41]  O. Larsson,et al.  Tissue distribution and differential expression of melanocortin 1 receptor, a malignant melanoma marker , 2002, British Journal of Cancer.

[42]  D. Görlich,et al.  The permeability barrier of nuclear pore complexes appears to operate via hydrophobic exclusion , 2002, The EMBO journal.

[43]  M. Bombaci,et al.  Identification and Cloning of a Cryptococcal Deacetylase That Produces Protective Immune Responses , 2002, Infection and Immunity.

[44]  J. Kublin,et al.  Delayed-type hypersensitivity in volunteers immunized with a synthetic multi-antigen peptide vaccine (PfCS-MAP1NYU) against Plasmodium falciparum sporozoites. , 2002, Vaccine.

[45]  N. Pante,et al.  Nuclear pore complex is able to transport macromolecules with diameters of about 39 nm. , 2002, Molecular biology of the cell.

[46]  E. Conti,et al.  Nucleocytoplasmic transport enters the atomic age. , 2001, Current opinion in cell biology.

[47]  G. Wilson,et al.  In vivo targeting of malignant melanoma by 125Iodine- and 99mTechnetium-labeled single-chain Fv fragments against high molecular weight melanoma-associated antigen. , 2000, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[48]  J. Moan,et al.  Increased binding of chlorin e6 to lipoproteins at low pH values. , 2000, The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology.

[49]  P. Chowienczyk,et al.  LDL particle size: an important drug target? , 1999, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[50]  J. Wikberg,et al.  Melanocortin receptors: perspectives for novel drugs. , 1999, European journal of pharmacology.

[51]  D. Kessel,et al.  Photodynamic therapy of B16F10 murine melanoma with lutetium texaphyrin. , 1998, Journal of Investigative Dermatology.

[52]  R. Jain,et al.  Regulation of transport pathways in tumor vessels: role of tumor type and microenvironment. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[53]  A. S. Sobolev,et al.  Nuclear Targeting of Chlorin e6 Enhances Its Photosensitizing Activity* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[54]  A. S. Sobolev,et al.  Modification of fluid lipid and mobile protein fractions of reticulocyte plasma membranes affects agonist-stimulated adenylate cyclase. Application of the percolation theory. , 1995, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[55]  D. Jocham,et al.  Tumour localisation kinetics of photofrin and three synthetic porphyrinoids in an amelanotic melanoma of the hamster. , 1993, British Journal of Cancer.

[56]  E. Gautherot,et al.  Targeting of indium 111-labeled bivalent hapten to human melanoma mediated by bispecific monoclonal antibody conjugates: imaging of tumors hosted in nude mice. , 1990, Cancer research.

[57]  A. Eberle,et al.  Characterization of Receptors for α-Melanocyte-stimulating Hormone on Human Melanoma Cells , 1989 .

[58]  A. Macgillivray ELISA and other solid phase immunoassays: Theoretical and practical aspects , 1989 .

[59]  T. Delaney,et al.  Photodynamic therapy of cancer. , 1988, Comprehensive therapy.

[60]  W. Wilson,et al.  A semiautomated microculture method for investigating growth inhibitory effects of cytotoxic compounds on exponentially growing carcinoma cells. , 1984, Analytical biochemistry.

[61]  郑俊海,et al.  科技期刊稿件处理的精细化管理——《International Journal of Nanomedicine〉〉投稿体会 , 2014 .

[62]  H. Maeda,et al.  Tumor-Targeted Macromolecular Drug Delivery Based on the Enhanced Permeability and Retention Effect in Solid Tumor , 2009 .

[63]  John M. Walker,et al.  The Protein Protocols Handbook , 2009, Springer Protocols Handbooks.

[64]  Andrew J Racher,et al.  Antibody production. , 2006, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[65]  A. S. Sobolev,et al.  Targeted intracellular delivery of photosensitizers. , 2000, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[66]  John M. Walker,et al.  The Protein Protocols Handbook , 1996, Humana Press.

[67]  S. Challacombe,et al.  ELISA and other solid phase immunoassys : theoretical and practical aspects , 1988 .