Lower pork consumption and technological change in feed production can reduce the pork supply chain environmental footprint in China
暂无分享,去创建一个
Fusuo Zhang | G. Velthof | O. Oenema | Weitong Long | Ling Zhang | B. Tong | Y. Hou | Wenqi Ma
[1] G. Velthof,et al. Relocate 10 billion livestock to reduce harmful nitrogen pollution exposure for 90% of China’s population , 2022, Nature Food.
[2] Baojing Gu,et al. Integrated livestock sector nitrogen pollution abatement measures could generate net benefits for human and ecosystem health in China , 2022, Nature Food.
[3] Baojing Gu. Recoupling livestock and crops , 2022, Nature Food.
[4] L. Longchamps,et al. On-Farm Experimentation to transform global agriculture , 2021, Nature Food.
[5] D. Willenbockel,et al. Income, consumer preferences, and the future of livestock-derived food demand , 2021, Global environmental change : human and policy dimensions.
[6] Katerina S. Stylianou,et al. Small targeted dietary changes can yield substantial gains for human health and the environment , 2021, Nature Food.
[7] C. Termeer,et al. Principles, drivers and opportunities of a circular bioeconomy , 2021, Nature Food.
[8] E. Davidson,et al. The increasing global environmental consequences of a weakening US–China crop trade relationship , 2021, Nature Food.
[9] Junguo Liu,et al. China’s food loss and waste embodies increasing environmental impacts , 2021, Nature Food.
[10] Zhanqing Zhao,et al. Nitrogen budgets of contrasting crop-livestock systems in China. , 2021, Environmental pollution.
[11] D. Chadwick,et al. Mitigation of Multiple Environmental Footprints for China's Pig Production Using Different Land Use Strategies. , 2021, Environmental science & technology.
[12] O. Oenema,et al. Operational costs and neglect of end-users are the main barriers to improving manure treatment in intensive livestock farms , 2020 .
[13] A. Mol,et al. Decoupling livestock and crop production at the household level in China , 2020, Nature Sustainability.
[14] Baojing Gu,et al. Societal benefits of halving agricultural ammonia emissions in China far exceed the abatement costs , 2020, Nature Communications.
[15] Jianguo Liu,et al. Impacts of international trade on global sustainable development , 2020, Nature Sustainability.
[16] S. Robinson,et al. Modelling the global economic consequences of a major African swine fever outbreak in China , 2020, Nature Food.
[17] D. Chadwick,et al. Can dietary manipulations improve the productivity of pigs with lower environmental and economic cost? A global meta-analysis , 2020 .
[18] Lei Chen,et al. High Altitude Adaptability and Meat Quality in Tibetan Pigs: A Reference for Local Pork Processing and Genetic Improvement , 2019, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.
[19] Fusuo Zhang,et al. Benefits and trade‐offs of replacing synthetic fertilizers by animal manures in crop production in China: A meta‐analysis , 2019, Global change biology.
[20] W. Winiwarter,et al. Reducing ammonia emissions from dairy cattle production via cost-effective manure management techniques in China. , 2019, Environmental science & technology.
[21] Lin Ma,et al. China needs long-term solutions for African Swine Fever. , 2019, Science bulletin.
[22] H. Steinfeld,et al. Nitrogen flows in global pork supply chains and potential improvement from feeding swill to pigs , 2019, Resources, Conservation and Recycling.
[23] G. Baiocchi,et al. Environmental impacts of dietary quality improvement in China. , 2019, Journal of environmental management.
[24] Abhishek Chaudhary,et al. Country-Specific Sustainable Diets Using Optimization Algorithm. , 2019, Environmental science & technology.
[25] E. Stehfest,et al. Future global pig production systems according to the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.
[26] Roslyn C. Henry,et al. Why the US–China trade war spells disaster for the Amazon , 2019, Nature.
[27] W. Willett,et al. Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems , 2019, The Lancet.
[28] Liangcong Fan,et al. Decreasing farm number benefits the mitigation of agricultural non-point source pollution in China , 2018, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.
[29] R. Didham,et al. A global strategy to mitigate the environmental impact of China’s ruminant consumption boom , 2018, Nature Communications.
[30] P. Havlík,et al. China’s livestock transition: Driving forces, impacts, and consequences , 2018, Science Advances.
[31] K. Olival,et al. Global hotspots and correlates of emerging zoonotic diseases , 2017, Nature Communications.
[32] P. Gerber,et al. Livestock: On our plates or eating at our table? A new analysis of the feed/food debate , 2017 .
[33] Quan Tang,et al. Can knowledge‐based N management produce more staple grain with lower greenhouse gas emission and reactive nitrogen pollution? A meta‐analysis , 2017, Global change biology.
[34] N. Thevs,et al. Carbon and phosphorus footprint of the cotton production in Xinjiang, China, in comparison to an alternative fibre (Apocynum) from Central Asia , 2017 .
[35] Pete Smith,et al. Mitigating Greenhouse Gas and Ammonia Emissions from Swine Manure Management: A System Analysis. , 2017, Environmental science & technology.
[36] G. Velthof,et al. Nutrient Recovery and Emissions of Ammonia, Nitrous Oxide, and Methane from Animal Manure in Europe: Effects of Manure Treatment Technologies. , 2017, Environmental science & technology.
[37] Arnold Tukker,et al. Environmental and resource footprints in a global context: Europe’s structural deficit in resource endowments , 2016 .
[38] R. Jiang,et al. Environmental, economic and social analysis of peri-urban pig production , 2016 .
[39] Pete Smith,et al. Greenhouse gas mitigation potentials in the livestock sector , 2016 .
[40] D. Chadwick,et al. Improving manure nutrient management towards sustainable agricultural intensification in China , 2015 .
[41] G. Velthof,et al. Mitigation of ammonia, nitrous oxide and methane emissions from manure management chains: a meta‐analysis and integrated assessment , 2015, Global change biology.
[42] O. Oenema,et al. Changes in pig production in China and their effects on nitrogen and phosphorus use and losses. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.
[43] Jianliang Huang,et al. Producing more grain with lower environmental costs , 2014, Nature.
[44] E. Schmid,et al. Climate change mitigation through livestock system transitions , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[45] Mario Herrero,et al. Livestock and global change: Emerging issues for sustainable food systems , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[46] Joachim Krieter,et al. Life Cycle Assessment of pork production: A data inventory for the case of Germany , 2013 .
[47] J. Lesschen,et al. The nitrogen footprint of food products in the European Union , 2013, The Journal of Agricultural Science.
[48] Pamela A. Matson,et al. Integrated soil–crop system management for food security , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[49] G. Velthof,et al. Modeling nutrient flows in the food chain of China. , 2010, Journal of environmental quality.
[50] Philip K. Thornton,et al. Livestock, livelihoods and the environment: understanding the trade-offs , 2009 .
[51] Daiwen Chen. Nutrition and feed strategies for sustainable swine production in China , 2009 .
[52] F. Schmidt. Meta-Analysis , 2008 .
[53] John Sinclair,et al. System of analysis , 2006 .
[54] S. Kim,et al. PORK PRODUCTION SYSTEMS IN CHINA: A REVIEW OF THEIR DEVELOPMENT, CHALLENGES AND PROSPECTS IN GREEN PRODUCTION , 2021, Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering.
[55] Keywan Riahi,et al. A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared socioeconomic pathways , 2013, Climatic Change.
[56] Brian C. O'Neill,et al. Meeting Report of the Workshop on The Nature and Use of New Socioeconomic Pathways for Climate Change Research , 2012 .
[57] C. Kroeze. N2O from animal waste. Methodology according to IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. , 1997 .