Lower pork consumption and technological change in feed production can reduce the pork supply chain environmental footprint in China

[1]  G. Velthof,et al.  Relocate 10 billion livestock to reduce harmful nitrogen pollution exposure for 90% of China’s population , 2022, Nature Food.

[2]  Baojing Gu,et al.  Integrated livestock sector nitrogen pollution abatement measures could generate net benefits for human and ecosystem health in China , 2022, Nature Food.

[3]  Baojing Gu Recoupling livestock and crops , 2022, Nature Food.

[4]  L. Longchamps,et al.  On-Farm Experimentation to transform global agriculture , 2021, Nature Food.

[5]  D. Willenbockel,et al.  Income, consumer preferences, and the future of livestock-derived food demand , 2021, Global environmental change : human and policy dimensions.

[6]  Katerina S. Stylianou,et al.  Small targeted dietary changes can yield substantial gains for human health and the environment , 2021, Nature Food.

[7]  C. Termeer,et al.  Principles, drivers and opportunities of a circular bioeconomy , 2021, Nature Food.

[8]  E. Davidson,et al.  The increasing global environmental consequences of a weakening US–China crop trade relationship , 2021, Nature Food.

[9]  Junguo Liu,et al.  China’s food loss and waste embodies increasing environmental impacts , 2021, Nature Food.

[10]  Zhanqing Zhao,et al.  Nitrogen budgets of contrasting crop-livestock systems in China. , 2021, Environmental pollution.

[11]  D. Chadwick,et al.  Mitigation of Multiple Environmental Footprints for China's Pig Production Using Different Land Use Strategies. , 2021, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  O. Oenema,et al.  Operational costs and neglect of end-users are the main barriers to improving manure treatment in intensive livestock farms , 2020 .

[13]  A. Mol,et al.  Decoupling livestock and crop production at the household level in China , 2020, Nature Sustainability.

[14]  Baojing Gu,et al.  Societal benefits of halving agricultural ammonia emissions in China far exceed the abatement costs , 2020, Nature Communications.

[15]  Jianguo Liu,et al.  Impacts of international trade on global sustainable development , 2020, Nature Sustainability.

[16]  S. Robinson,et al.  Modelling the global economic consequences of a major African swine fever outbreak in China , 2020, Nature Food.

[17]  D. Chadwick,et al.  Can dietary manipulations improve the productivity of pigs with lower environmental and economic cost? A global meta-analysis , 2020 .

[18]  Lei Chen,et al.  High Altitude Adaptability and Meat Quality in Tibetan Pigs: A Reference for Local Pork Processing and Genetic Improvement , 2019, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[19]  Fusuo Zhang,et al.  Benefits and trade‐offs of replacing synthetic fertilizers by animal manures in crop production in China: A meta‐analysis , 2019, Global change biology.

[20]  W. Winiwarter,et al.  Reducing ammonia emissions from dairy cattle production via cost-effective manure management techniques in China. , 2019, Environmental science & technology.

[21]  Lin Ma,et al.  China needs long-term solutions for African Swine Fever. , 2019, Science bulletin.

[22]  H. Steinfeld,et al.  Nitrogen flows in global pork supply chains and potential improvement from feeding swill to pigs , 2019, Resources, Conservation and Recycling.

[23]  G. Baiocchi,et al.  Environmental impacts of dietary quality improvement in China. , 2019, Journal of environmental management.

[24]  Abhishek Chaudhary,et al.  Country-Specific Sustainable Diets Using Optimization Algorithm. , 2019, Environmental science & technology.

[25]  E. Stehfest,et al.  Future global pig production systems according to the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[26]  Roslyn C. Henry,et al.  Why the US–China trade war spells disaster for the Amazon , 2019, Nature.

[27]  W. Willett,et al.  Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems , 2019, The Lancet.

[28]  Liangcong Fan,et al.  Decreasing farm number benefits the mitigation of agricultural non-point source pollution in China , 2018, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[29]  R. Didham,et al.  A global strategy to mitigate the environmental impact of China’s ruminant consumption boom , 2018, Nature Communications.

[30]  P. Havlík,et al.  China’s livestock transition: Driving forces, impacts, and consequences , 2018, Science Advances.

[31]  K. Olival,et al.  Global hotspots and correlates of emerging zoonotic diseases , 2017, Nature Communications.

[32]  P. Gerber,et al.  Livestock: On our plates or eating at our table? A new analysis of the feed/food debate , 2017 .

[33]  Quan Tang,et al.  Can knowledge‐based N management produce more staple grain with lower greenhouse gas emission and reactive nitrogen pollution? A meta‐analysis , 2017, Global change biology.

[34]  N. Thevs,et al.  Carbon and phosphorus footprint of the cotton production in Xinjiang, China, in comparison to an alternative fibre (Apocynum) from Central Asia , 2017 .

[35]  Pete Smith,et al.  Mitigating Greenhouse Gas and Ammonia Emissions from Swine Manure Management: A System Analysis. , 2017, Environmental science & technology.

[36]  G. Velthof,et al.  Nutrient Recovery and Emissions of Ammonia, Nitrous Oxide, and Methane from Animal Manure in Europe: Effects of Manure Treatment Technologies. , 2017, Environmental science & technology.

[37]  Arnold Tukker,et al.  Environmental and resource footprints in a global context: Europe’s structural deficit in resource endowments , 2016 .

[38]  R. Jiang,et al.  Environmental, economic and social analysis of peri-urban pig production , 2016 .

[39]  Pete Smith,et al.  Greenhouse gas mitigation potentials in the livestock sector , 2016 .

[40]  D. Chadwick,et al.  Improving manure nutrient management towards sustainable agricultural intensification in China , 2015 .

[41]  G. Velthof,et al.  Mitigation of ammonia, nitrous oxide and methane emissions from manure management chains: a meta‐analysis and integrated assessment , 2015, Global change biology.

[42]  O. Oenema,et al.  Changes in pig production in China and their effects on nitrogen and phosphorus use and losses. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[43]  Jianliang Huang,et al.  Producing more grain with lower environmental costs , 2014, Nature.

[44]  E. Schmid,et al.  Climate change mitigation through livestock system transitions , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  Mario Herrero,et al.  Livestock and global change: Emerging issues for sustainable food systems , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[46]  Joachim Krieter,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of pork production: A data inventory for the case of Germany , 2013 .

[47]  J. Lesschen,et al.  The nitrogen footprint of food products in the European Union , 2013, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[48]  Pamela A. Matson,et al.  Integrated soil–crop system management for food security , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  G. Velthof,et al.  Modeling nutrient flows in the food chain of China. , 2010, Journal of environmental quality.

[50]  Philip K. Thornton,et al.  Livestock, livelihoods and the environment: understanding the trade-offs , 2009 .

[51]  Daiwen Chen Nutrition and feed strategies for sustainable swine production in China , 2009 .

[52]  F. Schmidt Meta-Analysis , 2008 .

[53]  John Sinclair,et al.  System of analysis , 2006 .

[54]  S. Kim,et al.  PORK PRODUCTION SYSTEMS IN CHINA: A REVIEW OF THEIR DEVELOPMENT, CHALLENGES AND PROSPECTS IN GREEN PRODUCTION , 2021, Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering.

[55]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared socioeconomic pathways , 2013, Climatic Change.

[56]  Brian C. O'Neill,et al.  Meeting Report of the Workshop on The Nature and Use of New Socioeconomic Pathways for Climate Change Research , 2012 .

[57]  C. Kroeze N2O from animal waste. Methodology according to IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. , 1997 .