Algorithms for optimizing CT fluence control

The ability to customize the incident x-ray fluence in CT via beam-shaping filters or mA modulation is known to improve image quality and/or reduce radiation dose. Previous work has shown that complete control of x-ray fluence (ray-by-ray fluence modulation) would further improve dose efficiency. While complete control of fluence is not currently possible, emerging concepts such as dynamic attenuators and inverse-geometry CT allow nearly complete control to be realized. Optimally using ray-by-ray fluence modulation requires solving a very high-dimensional optimization problem. Most optimization techniques fail or only provide approximate solutions. We present efficient algorithms for minimizing mean or peak variance given a fixed dose limit. The reductions in variance can easily be translated to reduction in dose, if the original variance met image quality requirements. For mean variance, a closed form solution is derived. The peak variance problem is recast as iterated, weighted mean variance minimization, and at each iteration it is possible to bound the distance to the optimal solution. We apply our algorithms in simulations of scans of the thorax and abdomen. Peak variance reductions of 45% and 65% are demonstrated in the abdomen and thorax, respectively, compared to a bowtie filter alone. Mean variance shows smaller gains (about 15%).

[1]  Timothy P. Szczykutowicz,et al.  Design of a digital beam attenuation system for computed tomography: part I. System design and simulation framework. , 2013, Medical physics.

[2]  Norbert J. Pelc,et al.  Optimized control of a dynamic, prepatient attenuator , 2013, Medical Imaging.

[3]  L. Tanoue Computed Tomography — An Increasing Source of Radiation Exposure , 2009 .

[4]  S J Riederer,et al.  Noise Due to Photon Counting Statistics in Computed X‐Ray Tomography , 1977, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[5]  K. Strauss,et al.  The Image Gently campaign: working together to change practice. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  Jiang Hsieh,et al.  Computed Tomography: Principles, Design, Artifacts, and Recent Advances, Fourth Edition , 2022 .

[7]  Steven Bartolac,et al.  Fluence field optimization for noise and dose objectives in CT. , 2011, Medical physics.

[8]  W A Kalender,et al.  Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation. II. Phantom measurements. , 1999, Medical physics.

[9]  Jonathan Sperl,et al.  Computer-Assisted Scan Protocol and Reconstruction (CASPAR)—Reduction of Image Noise and Patient Dose , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  C. Mistretta,et al.  Design of a digital beam attenuation system for computed tomography. Part II. Performance study and initial results. , 2013, Medical physics.

[11]  Bruno De Man,et al.  Multi-source inverse geometry CT: a new system concept for x-ray computed tomography , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[12]  James A Brink,et al.  Image Wisely: a campaign to increase awareness about adult radiation protection. , 2010, Radiology.

[13]  Norbert J Pelc,et al.  The feasibility of a piecewise-linear dynamic bowtie filter. , 2013, Medical physics.

[14]  W A Kalender,et al.  Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation. I. Simulation studies. , 1999, Medical physics.

[15]  N. Pelc,et al.  An inverse-geometry volumetric CT system with a large-area scanned source: a feasibility study. , 2004, Medical physics.

[16]  M D Harpen A simple theorem relating noise and patient dose in computed tomography. , 1999, Medical physics.

[17]  Taly Gilat Schmidt,et al.  A prototype table‐top inverse‐geometry volumetric CT system , 2006 .