Adjusting Central and Eastern North America Ground‐Motion Intensity Measures between Sites with Different Reference‐Rock Site Conditions

Abstract Adjustment factors are provided for converting ground‐motion intensity measures between central and eastern North America (CENA) sites with different reference‐rock site conditions ( V S 30 =760, 2000, and 3000  m/s) for moment magnitudes ranging from 2 to 8, rupture distances ranging from 2 to 1200 km, Fourier amplitude spectra (FAS) for frequencies ranging from 0.01 to 100 Hz, response spectra for periods ranging from 0.01 to 10.0 s, peak ground acceleration, and peak ground velocity. The adjustment factors are given for a wide range of the site diminution parameters ( κ 0 ) for sites with V S 30 =760  m/s and for a κ 0 of 0.006 s for two harder rock sites. Fourteen CENA velocity profiles with V S 30 values within a factor of 1.1 of 760  m/s were used to derive average FAS amplification factors as a function of frequency, which were then used in simulations of peak ground‐motion parameters and response spectra to derive the adjustment factors. The amplification function differs from that used in western North America (e.g., Campbell and Boore, 2016) in having a peak near 9 Hz, due to the resonance of motions in the relatively thin low‐velocity material over hard rock that characterizes many CENA sites with V S 30 near 760  m/s. We call these B/C sites, because this velocity marks the boundary between National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program site classes B and C (Building Seismic Safety Council, 2004). The adjustments for short‐period motions are sensitive to the value of κ 0 , but there are very few if any determinations of κ 0 for CENA B/C sites. For this reason, we determined κ 0 from multiple recordings at Pinyon Flat Observatory (PFO), California, which has a velocity‐depth profile similar to those of CENA B/C sites. The PFO and other results from the literature suggest that appropriate values of κ 0 for CENA B/C sites are expected to lie between 0.01 and 0.03 s. Electronic Supplement: Zip files with parameters used by Stochastic‐Method SIMulation (SMSIM) and ratios of the ground‐motion intensity measures between hard‐rock sites and National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP) B/C sites.

[1]  D. Perkins,et al.  National Seismic-Hazard Maps: Documentation June 1996 , 1996 .

[2]  Peter M. Shearer,et al.  High-frequency borehole seismograms recorded in the San Jacinto Fault zone, Southern California. Part 1. Polarizations , 1991, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[3]  Stéphane Drouet,et al.  Analysis of the Origins of κ (Kappa) to Compute Hard Rock to Rock Adjustment Factors for GMPEs , 2011 .

[4]  J. Douglas,et al.  High-frequency filtering of strong-motion records , 2011 .

[5]  D. Boore.  The Uses and Limitations of the Square‐Root‐Impedance Method for Computing Site Amplification , 2013 .

[6]  Jonathan P. Stewart,et al.  Reference Rock Site Condition for Central and Eastern North America , 2014 .

[7]  Charles S. Mueller,et al.  Documentation for the 2008 update of the United States National Seismic Hazard Maps , 2008 .

[8]  J. Boatwright,et al.  Regional Spectral Analysis of Three Moderate Earthquakes in Northeastern North America , 2011 .

[9]  Gail M. Atkinson,et al.  Referenced Empirical Ground-Motion Model for Eastern North America , 2015 .

[10]  K. Campbell,et al.  Evaluation of Six NEHRP B/C Crustal Amplification Models Proposed for Use in Western North America , 2016 .

[11]  Kenneth W. Campbell,et al.  Estimates of Shear-Wave Q and κ0 for Unconsolidated and Semiconsolidated Sediments in Eastern North America , 2009 .

[12]  Luca Malagnini,et al.  Attenuation and excitation of three-component ground motion in southern California , 1999 .

[13]  Charles S. Mueller,et al.  2014 update of the U.S. national seismic hazard maps , 2014 .

[14]  K. Campbell,et al.  Ground Motion Prediction Equations for Eastern North America Using the Hybrid Empirical Method and NGA-West 2 Empirical Ground Motion Models , 2015 .

[15]  Gail M. Atkinson,et al.  Estimation of Moment Magnitude (M) for Small Events (M<4) on Local Networks , 2014 .

[16]  Jonathan P. Stewart,et al.  NGA-West2 Equations for Predicting PGA, PGV, and 5% Damped PSA for Shallow Crustal Earthquakes , 2014 .

[17]  Frank L. Vernon,et al.  A Comparison of Spectral Parameter Kappa from Small and Moderate Earthquakes Using Southern California ANZA Seismic Network Data , 2012 .

[18]  Gail M. Atkinson,et al.  Regionally Adjustable Generic Ground‐Motion Prediction Equation Based on Equivalent Point‐Source Simulations: Application to Central and Eastern North America , 2015 .

[19]  David M. Boore,et al.  SMSIM — Fortran Programs for Simulating Ground Motions from Earthquakes: Version 2.3 — A Revision of OFR 96–80–A , 2000 .

[20]  Peter M. Shearer,et al.  High-frequency borehole seismograms recorded in the San Jcinto Fault zone, Southern California Part 2. Attenuation and site effects , 1991, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[21]  Frank Scherbaum,et al.  On the Relationship between Fourier and Response Spectra: Implications for the Adjustment of Empirical Ground‐Motion Prediction Equations (GMPEs) , 2016 .

[22]  Gail M. Atkinson,et al.  Earthquake Ground-Motion Prediction Equations for Eastern North America , 2006 .

[23]  David M. Boore,et al.  Determining Generic Velocity and Density Models for Crustal Amplification Calculations, with an Update of the Generic Site Amplification for , 2016 .

[24]  R. B. Darragh,et al.  Engineering characterization of strong ground motion recorded at rock sites. Final report , 1995 .

[25]  David M. Boore,et al.  Path Durations for Use in the Stochastic‐Method Simulation of Ground Motions , 2014 .

[26]  K. Campbell.  PREDICTION OF STRONG GROUND MOTION USING THE HYBRID EMPIRICAL METHOD AND ITS USE IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF GROUND-MOTION (ATTENUATION) RELATIONS IN EASTERN NORTH AMERICA , 2003 .

[27]  L. M. Baker,et al.  The Anza array: A high-dynamic-range, broadband, digitally radiotelemetered seismic array , 1984 .

[28]  S. Harmsen,et al.  Documentation for the 2002 update of the national seismic hazard maps , 2002 .

[29]  David M. Boore,et al.  On using surface-source downhole-receiver logging to determine seismic slownesses , 2007 .

[30]  David M. Boore,et al.  Simulation of Ground Motion Using the Stochastic Method , 2003 .

[31]  G. Balco,et al.  Summary of Early and Middle Pleistocene Glaciations in Northern Missouri, USA , 2011 .

[32]  Robert A. Williams,et al.  Predicted and Observed Spectral Response from Collocated Shallow, Active- and Passive-Source Vs Data at Five ANSS Sites, Illinois and Indiana, USA , 2010 .

[33]  D. Boore.  Updated Determination of Stress Parameters for Nine Well-Recorded Earthquakes in Eastern North America , 2012 .

[34]  Jongwon Lee.  Engineering Characterization of Earthquake Ground Motions. , 2009 .

[35]  David M. Boore,et al.  Site amplifications for generic rock sites , 1997, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[36]  T. Fumal,et al.  Near-surface velocities and attenuation at two boreholes near Anza, California, from logging data , 1990, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[37]  Gail M. Atkinson,et al.  An Equivalent Point‐Source Model for Stochastic Simulation of Earthquake Ground Motions in California , 2015 .

[38]  Norman A. Abrahamson,et al.  Taxonomy of κ: A Review of Definitions and Estimation Approaches Targeted to Applications , 2014 .

[39]  Kenneth H. Stokoe,et al.  ARRA-funded V S30 measurements using multi-technique approach at strong-motion stations in California and central-eastern United States , 2013 .

[40]  Jonathan P. Stewart,et al.  Semi-Empirical Nonlinear Site Amplification from NGA-West2 Data and Simulations , 2014 .

[41]  John G. Anderson,et al.  A MODEL FOR THE SHAPE OF THE FOURIER AMPLITUDE SPECTRUM OF ACCELERATION AT HIGH FREQUENCIES , 1984 .

[42]  Frank Scherbaum,et al.  Fourier spectral- and duration models for the generation of response spectra adjustable to different source-, propagation-, and site conditions , 2014, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[43]  F. Scherbaum,et al.  Development of a Response Spectral Ground‐Motion Prediction Equation (GMPE) for Seismic‐Hazard Analysis from Empirical Fourier Spectral and Duration Models , 2015 .

[44]  David M. Boore,et al.  Revisions to Some Parameters Used in Stochastic‐Method Simulations of Ground Motion , 2015 .

[45]  G. Atkinson,et al.  Shear-Wave Velocity Survey of Seismographic Sites in Eastern Canada: Calibration of Empirical Regression Method of Estimating Site Response , 1997 .

[46]  D. Boore.  Determining Generic Velocity and Density Models for Crustal Amplification Calculations , with an Update of the Boore and Joyner ( 1997 ) Generic Site Amplification for VS Z 760 , 2016 .

[47]  John G. Anderson.  A PRELIMINARY DESCRIPTIVE MODEL FOR THE DISTANCE DEPENDENCE OF THE SPECTRAL DECAY PARAMETER IN , 1991 .

[48]  R. Herrmann,et al.  Shallow P - and S -Wave Velocities and Site Resonances in the St. Louis Region, Missouri-Illinois , 2007 .

[49]  Gail M. Atkinson,et al.  Determination of Stress Parameters for Eight Well-Recorded Earthquakes in Eastern North America , 2010 .

[50]  David M. Boore,et al.  Comparison of Shear-Wave Slowness Profiles at 10 Strong-Motion Sites from Noninvasive SASW Measurements and Measurements Made in Boreholes , 2002 .

[51]  Site-Response Spectra for POLARIS Station Sites in Southern Ontario and Quebec , 2008 .

[52]  L. M. Baker,et al.  Attenuation near Anza, California , 1988 .

[53]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  The high‐frequency limit of usable response spectral ordinates from filtered analogue and digital strong‐motion accelerograms , 2011 .

[54]  Charles S. Mueller,et al.  2014 Update of the United States National Seismic Hazard Maps , 2012 .

[55]  J. Harmon.  Nonlinear site amplification functions for Central and Eastern North America , 2017 .