Exploring multi-stage shape optimization strategy of multi-body geometries using Kriging-based model and adjoint method

Abstract This paper deals with an efficient and high-fidelity design strategy for wing-body configuration. According to the nature of the design space and the number of design variables, aerodynamic shape optimization is carried out at each design stage by using a selective optimization strategy. In the first stage, global optimization techniques are applied to wing planform design with a few geometric design variables. In the second stage, local optimization techniques are employed to wing surface design with many design variables, which can maintain a sufficient design space with a high Degree of Freedom (DOF) geometric change. For global optimization, the Kriging method in conjunction with a Genetic Algorithm (GA) is used. A searching algorithm exploiting Expected Improvement (EI) design points is introduced to efficiently enhance the quality of the initial Kriging model for the wing planform design. For local optimization, a discrete adjoint method is adopted to obtain sensitivity information by fully hand-differentiating the three-dimensional Euler and N–S equations on an overset mesh topology. By the successive use of the global and local optimization methods, the drag of a multi-body aircraft configuration can be minimized for inviscid and viscous flow conditions while the baseline lift and wing weight are maintained. Throughout the design process, the performances of the test models are improved, compared to those with the single stage design approach. The performance of the proposed multi-stage design framework is evaluated by the drag decomposition method.

[1]  Antony Jameson,et al.  Aerodynamic design via control theory , 1988, J. Sci. Comput..

[2]  Dong-Ho Lee,et al.  Response Surface Method for Airfoil Design in Transonic Flow , 2001 .

[3]  W. K. Anderson,et al.  Recent improvements in aerodynamic design optimization on unstructured meshes , 2001 .

[4]  K. Nakahashi,et al.  Aerodynamic Design Optimization of Wing-Body Configurations , 2005 .

[5]  Byung Joon Lee,et al.  Aerodynamic Redesign Using Discrete Adjoint Approach on Overset Mesh System , 2008 .

[6]  C. P. van Dam,et al.  Recent experience with different methods of drag prediction , 1999 .

[7]  Donald R. Jones,et al.  Efficient Global Optimization of Expensive Black-Box Functions , 1998, J. Glob. Optim..

[8]  Timothy M. Mauery,et al.  COMPARISON OF RESPONSE SURFACE AND KRIGING MODELS FOR MULTIDISCIPLINARY DESIGN OPTIMIZATION , 1998 .

[9]  J. McCall,et al.  Genetic algorithms for modelling and optimisation , 2005 .

[10]  Antony Jameson,et al.  Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of Wings including Planform Variations , 2003 .

[11]  Russell M. Cummings,et al.  Analysis of the Elements of Drag in Three-Dimensional Viscous and Inviscid Flows , 1996 .

[12]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[13]  Pierre Sagaut,et al.  A surrogate-model based multidisciplinary shape optimization method with application to a 2D subsonic airfoil , 2007 .

[14]  Ralph Noack,et al.  Improved interpolation for viscous overset grids , 1997 .

[15]  Meng-Sing Liou,et al.  Optimizing a Boundary-Layer-Ingestion Offset Inlet by Discrete Adjoint Approach , 2010 .

[16]  D. Mavriplis Discrete Adjoint-Based Approach for Optimization Problems on Three-Dimensional Unstructured Meshes , 2007 .

[17]  Chongam Kim,et al.  Cures for the shock instability: development of a shock-stable Roe scheme , 2003 .

[18]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments , 1995 .

[19]  Juan J. Alonso,et al.  Mutiobjective Optimization Using Approximation Model-Based Genetic Algorithms , 2004 .

[20]  W. K. Anderson,et al.  Aerodynamic design optimization on unstructured grids with a continuous adjoint formulation , 1997 .

[21]  Jason E. Hicken,et al.  Induced-Drag Minimization of Nonplanar Geometries Based on the Euler Equations , 2010 .

[22]  Chongam Kim,et al.  Multi-dimensional limiting process for three-dimensional flow physics analyses , 2008, J. Comput. Phys..

[23]  Thomas J. Santner,et al.  The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments , 2003, Springer Series in Statistics.

[24]  Luigi Paparone,et al.  Computational Fluid Dynamics-Based Drag Prediction and Decomposition , 2003 .

[25]  Kazuomi Yamamoto,et al.  Efficient Optimization Design Method Using Kriging Model , 2005 .

[26]  Byung Joon Lee,et al.  Automated design methodology of turbulent internal flow using discrete adjoint formulation , 2007 .

[27]  John C. Vassberg,et al.  Summary of Data from the First AIAA CFD Drag Prediction Workshop , 2002 .