AFM Characterization of Semiconductor Line Edge Roughness

Atomic force microscopy (AFM) is an important technique for measurement of the surface roughness and surface features of high technology surfaces such as semiconductor chips and micro-optics. One of the key measurands is the linewidth of semiconductor features [1]. A class of AFM instruments often called CD-AFM has been developed for the purpose of measuring linewidth accurately (Fig. 9.1). The smallest linewidth or hole diameter on a semiconductor circuit is called the critical dimension or CD. Recently, a requirement has arisen in the semiconductor industry for control, specification, and measurement of line edge roughness (LER) for functional semiconductor features, such as processor gates [2–5]. As feature dimensions become steadily smaller, the LER of a single gate is becoming a significant fraction of the gate length itself. Hence, the LER is expected to have a significant effect on properties of the gate such as leakage current. The International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS) [6] specifies a physical gate length for 2002 of 75 nm and a maximum LER of 3.9 nm. The effect of LER on the function of an electronic gate has been modeled by several studies and these models have been verified experimentally. This work has led in part to a succinct specification of LER requirements for current and future generations of semiconductor circuits. This specification has been inserted into the International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS) [6].

[1]  P. Russell,et al.  Scanning probe tip geometry optimized for metrology by focused ion beam ion milling , 1991 .

[2]  Y. Ochiai,et al.  Investigating Line-Edge Roughness in Calixarene Fine Patterns Using Fourier Analysis , 2002 .

[3]  Nano-scale fluctuations in electron beam resist pattern evaluated by atomic force microscopy , 1996 .

[4]  Hemantha K. Wickramasinghe,et al.  Atomic force microscope–force mapping and profiling on a sub 100‐Å scale , 1987 .

[5]  Brian Osborn,et al.  Study of the fundamental contributions to line edge roughness in a 193 nm, top surface imaging system , 2000 .

[6]  Laurent Ithier,et al.  Amplitude and spatial frequency characterization of line-edge roughness using CD-SEM , 2002, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[7]  A. Meyyappan,et al.  Foot (bottom corner) measurement of a structure with SPM , 2001, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[8]  H. Kumar Wickramasinghe,et al.  Toward accurate metrology with scanning force microscopes , 1995 .

[9]  K. Ronse,et al.  Metrology method for the correlation of line edge roughness for different resists before and after etch , 2001 .

[10]  C. R. Helms,et al.  Analyzing atomic force microscopy images using spectral methods , 1997 .

[11]  R. Schaller,et al.  Technological innovation in the semiconductor industry: A case study of the International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS) , 2001, PICMET '01. Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology. Proceedings Vol.1: Book of Summaries (IEEE Cat. No.01CH37199).

[12]  Shiying Xiong,et al.  Gate line-edge roughness effects in 50-nm bulk MOSFET devices , 2002, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[13]  H. Kumar Wickramasinghe,et al.  Method for imaging sidewalls by atomic force microscopy , 1994 .

[14]  Shinji Okazaki,et al.  Nano edge roughness in polymer resist patterns , 1993 .

[15]  A. Meyyappan,et al.  Measurement of sidewall, line, and line-edge roughness with scanning probe microscopy , 2001, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[16]  J. Zavada,et al.  Relationship between surface scattering and microtopographic features (A) , 1979 .

[17]  Diana Nyyssonen,et al.  Two‐dimensional atomic force microprobe trench metrology system , 1991 .

[18]  Wen-li Wu,et al.  Small angle neutron scattering measurements of nanoscale lithographic features , 2000 .

[19]  Susan C. Palmateer,et al.  Metrology methods for quantifying edge roughness: II , 1999, Advanced Lithography.

[20]  Shigeru Moriya,et al.  Comparative study of resolution limiting factors in electron beam lithography using the edge roughness evaluation method , 2001 .

[21]  J. E. Griffith,et al.  Dimensional metrology with scanning probe microscopes , 1993 .

[22]  Surface and line-edge roughness in solution and plasma developed negative tone resists: Experiment and simulation , 2000 .

[23]  Ronald G. Dixson,et al.  Algorithms for calculating single-atom step heights , 1999 .

[24]  Shigeru Moriya,et al.  Quantitative factor analysis of resolution limit in electron beam lithography using the edge roughness evaluation method , 2000 .

[25]  Winfried Denk,et al.  Local electrical dissipation imaged by scanning force microscopy , 1991 .

[26]  James W. Taylor,et al.  Correlation of atomic force microscopy sidewall roughness measurements with scanning electron microscopy line-edge roughness measurements on chemically amplified resists exposed by x-ray lithography , 1999 .

[27]  Vladimir Mancevski,et al.  Development of a dual-probe Caliper CD-AFM for near model-independent nanometrology , 2002, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[28]  J. Bennett,et al.  Introduction to Surface Roughness and Scattering , 1999 .

[29]  C.H. Diaz,et al.  An experimentally validated analytical model for gate line-edge roughness (LER) effects on technology scaling , 2001, IEEE Electron Device Letters.

[30]  Angeliki Tserepi,et al.  Characterization and simulation of surface and line-edge roughness in photoresists , 2001 .

[31]  J. Raja,et al.  Multi-scale analysis of engineering surfaces , 1995 .

[32]  T. Vorburger,et al.  Regimes of surface roughness measurable with light scattering. , 1993, Applied optics.

[33]  John L. Sturtevant,et al.  Experimental determination of the impact of polysilicon LER on sub-100-nm transistor performance , 2001, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[34]  Kenji Yamazaki,et al.  Nanometer-scale linewidth fluctuations caused by polymer aggregates in resist films , 1997 .

[35]  James W. Taylor,et al.  Factors contributing to sidewall roughness in a positive-tone, chemically amplified resist exposed by x-ray lithography , 1999 .

[36]  B. Muralikrishnan,et al.  Recent advances in separation of roughness, waviness and form , 2002 .

[37]  Martha I. Sanchez,et al.  Deep-ultraviolet interferometric lithography as a tool for assessment of chemically amplified photoresist performance , 1998 .

[38]  M. Meyyappan,et al.  Carbon nanotube tip probes: stability and lateral resolution in scanning probe microscopy and application to surface science in semiconductors , 2001 .

[39]  Martha I. Sanchez,et al.  Carbon nanotube scanning probe for profiling of deep-ultraviolet and 193 nm photoresist patterns , 2002 .

[40]  David J. Whitehouse,et al.  The parameter rash — is there a cure? , 1982 .

[41]  Jangho Shin,et al.  Resist line edge roughness and aerial image contrast , 2001 .

[42]  F. Cerrina,et al.  Process dependence of roughness in a positive-tone chemically amplified resist , 1998 .

[43]  Michael T. Postek,et al.  Scanning electron microscope metrology , 1994, Advanced Lithography.

[44]  Theodore V. Vorburger,et al.  Characterization of Surface Topography , 2002 .