Are three-sample tasks less sensitive than two-sample tasks? Memory effects in the testing of taste discrimination

[1]  Michael O'Mahony,et al.  Discrimination testing: a few ideas, old and new , 2003 .

[2]  E. Köster,et al.  Proactive and retroactive interference in implicit odor memory. , 2002, Chemical senses.

[3]  D. Ennis,et al.  A Thurstonian model for the dual pair (4IAX) discrimination method , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  M. O'Mahony,et al.  INVESTIGATION OF THE DUAL‐PAIR METHOD AS A POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVE TO THE TRIANGLE AND SAME‐DIFFERENT TESTS , 2001 .

[5]  M. O'Mahony,et al.  Investigation of the effect of within-trial retasting and comparison of the dual-pair, same-different and triangle paradigms , 2000 .

[6]  M. O'Mahony,et al.  Mustard discrimination by same–different and triangle tests: aspects of irritation, memory and τ criteria , 1999 .

[7]  M. O'Mahony,et al.  SAME‐DIFFERENT DISCRIMINATION TESTS WITH INTERSTIMULUS DELAYS UP TO ONE DAY , 1999 .

[8]  M. O'Mahony,et al.  Comparison of d′ values for the 2-AFC (paired comparison) and 3-AFC discrimination methods: Thurstonian models, sequential sensitivity analysis and power , 1998 .

[9]  H. Meiselman,et al.  Longitudinal measurement of three eating behavior scales during a period of change , 1998 .

[10]  T. White.  Olfactory memory: the long and short of it. , 1998, Chemical senses.

[11]  M. O'Mahony,et al.  POWER AND SENSITIVITY OF THE SAME‐DIFFERENT TEST: COMPARISON WITH TRIANGLE AND DUO‐TRIO METHODS , 1998 .

[12]  M. O'Mahony,et al.  Oral irritant effects of nicotine: psychophysical evidence for decreased sensation following repeated application and lack of cross-desensitization to capsaicin. , 1997, Chemical senses.

[13]  Michael O'Mahony,et al.  SENSORY DIFFERENCE TESTS: THURSTONIAN AND SSA PREDICTIONS FOR VANILLA FLAVORED YOGURTS , 1997 .

[14]  Jian Bi,et al.  HOW TO ESTIMATE AND USE THE VARIANCE OF d’ FROM DIFFERENCE TESTS , 1997 .

[15]  R. Stevenson,et al.  Judgments of chemosensory mixtures in memory. , 1997, Acta psychologica.

[16]  R. J. Irwin,et al.  ADVANTAGES OF THE SAME‐DIFFERENT METHOD OVER THE TRIANGULAR METHOD FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF TASTE DISCRIMINATION , 1995 .

[17]  D. Ennis,et al.  Probabilistic models for sequential taste effects in triadic choice. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  Michael O'Mahony,et al.  Cognitive aspects of difference testing : memory and interstimulus delay , 1995 .

[19]  M. O'Mahony,et al.  BEER BITTERNESS DETECTION: TESTING THURSTONIAN AND SEQUENTIAL SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS MODELS FOR TRIAD AND TETRAD METHODS , 1995 .

[20]  Michael J. Hautus,et al.  TWO MODELS FOR ESTIMATING THE DISCRIMINABILITY OF FOODS AND BEVERAGES , 1995 .

[21]  A. Holley,et al.  Very short term recognition memory for odors , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  Michael O'Mahony,et al.  A THEORETICAL NOTE ON DIFFERENCE TESTS: MODELS, PARADOXES AND COGNITIVE STRATEGIES , 1994 .

[23]  D. Ennis,et al.  Preference gives more consistent judgments than oddity only if the task can be modeled as forced choice , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  Daniel M. Ennis,et al.  THE POWER OF SENSORY DISCRIMINATION METHODS , 1993 .

[25]  Lawrence E. Marks,et al.  Memory psychophysics for chemosensation: perceptual and mental mixtures of odor and taste , 1993 .

[26]  J. Stillman.  Response selection, sensitivity, and taste-test performance , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  R. J. Irwin,et al.  Use of the receiver operating characteristic in the study of taste perception , 1992 .

[28]  E. N. Geelhoed,et al.  Preference can be more powerful than detection of oddity as a test of discriminability , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[30]  A. Baddeley.  Human Memory: Theory and Practice, Revised Edition , 1990 .

[31]  L. Marks,et al.  Memory psychophysics for taste , 1989 .

[32]  F. Sauvageot,et al.  COMPARISON OF THE EFFICIENCY OF PAIR, DUO‐TRIO AND TRIANGLE TESTS , 1988 .

[33]  Moshe Givon,et al.  Measurement of Discrimination Ability in Taste Tests: An Empirical Investigation , 1987 .

[34]  M. O'Mahony,et al.  Effectiveness of Sensory Difference Tests: Sequential Sensitivity Analysis for Liquid Food Stimuli , 1986 .

[35]  Michael O'Mahony,et al.  A Comparison of Sensory Difference Testing Procedures: Sequential Sensitivity Analysis and Aspects of Taste Adaptation , 1985 .

[36]  E. E. Johns,et al.  Interference and facilitation in short-term memory for odors , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[37]  R Mair,et al.  Odor discrimination and memory in Korsakoff's psychosis. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  J. Frijters,et al.  Tables of d′ for the triangular method and the 3-AFC signal detection procedure , 1980 .

[39]  J. Frijters,et al.  The paradox of discriminatory nondiscriminators resolved , 1979 .

[40]  M. O'Mahony.  Salt Taste Adaptation: The Psychophysical Effects of Adapting Solutions and Residual Stimuli from Prior Tastings on the Taste of Sodium Chloride , 1979, Perception.

[41]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A revised table of d’ for M-alternative forced choice , 1979 .

[42]  Howard L. Kaplan,et al.  Tables of d′ for variable-standard discrimination paradigms , 1978 .

[43]  P D Eimas,et al.  Short-term memory of odors. , 1973, Journal of experimental psychology.

[44]  R. Kinchla,et al.  A diffusion model of perceptual memory , 1967 .

[45]  D. Mcburney,et al.  The effect of adaptation on taste jnds , 1967 .

[46]  E Galanter,et al.  A significance test for one parameter isosensitivity functions , 1967, Psychometrika.

[47]  M. O'Mahony,et al.  Investigating more powerful discrimination tests with consumers: effects of memory and response bias , 2002 .

[48]  Lawrence Butler,et al.  'History: Theory and Practice' , 1997 .

[49]  M. O'Mahony,et al.  Flavour discrimination: An extension of thurstonian ‘Paradoxes’ to the tetrad method , 1996 .

[50]  Jeff Miller.  The sampling distribution ofd′ , 1996 .

[51]  J. Miller,et al.  The sampling distribution of d'. , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[52]  L. Thurstone.  A law of comparative judgment. , 1994 .

[53]  D. Ennis,et al.  Triadic discrimination testing: refinement of Thurstonian and sequential sensitivity analysis approaches. , 1994, Chemical senses.

[54]  J. Frijters,et al.  Expanded tables for conversion of a proportion of correct responses (P') to the measure of sensory difference (d') for the triangular method and the 3-altern , 1982 .

[55]  T. Engen,et al.  Associations to odors: interference, mnemonics, and verbal labeling. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[56]  N. T. Gridgeman.  A Reexamination of the Two-Stage Triangle Test for the Perception of Sensory Differencesa , 1970 .

[57]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[58]  J. Swets.  Signal detection and recognition by human observers : contemporary readings , 1964 .

[59]  P. B. Elliott,et al.  Tables of d , 1959 .

[60]  T. Marill.  Detection theory and psychophysics , 1956 .