Inhalable railroad particles at ground level and subterranean stations - Physical and chemical properties and relation to train traffic

The paper compares PM10 concentrations in railroad environments with EU air quality standards and characterizes particle concentrations and particle properties in relation to train traffic. The results show that PM10 concentrations in ground-level railroad environments do not exceed the EU directive 24-h limit value, while on the platforms of the two subterranean stations PM10 concentrations were far above the outdoor limit value. Diurnal and weekly patterns in PM10 concentration could be identified, co-varying with train traffic intensity. The particle mass size distribution peaked at around 2-6 um. The elemental composition of PM10 at the subterranean stations was dominated by Fe. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

[1]  Sonja N Sax,et al.  Elevated airborne exposures of teenagers to manganese, chromium, and iron from steel dust and New York City's subway system. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  Yu-Hsiang Cheng,et al.  Measurement of Particle Mass Concentrations and Size Distributions in an Underground Station , 2010 .

[3]  John D. Spengler,et al.  Steel dust in the New York City subway system as a source of manganese, chromium, and iron exposures for transit workers , 2005, Journal of Urban Health.

[4]  Mats Gustafsson,et al.  Properties and toxicological effects of particles from the interaction between tyres, road pavement and winter traction material. , 2008, The Science of the total environment.

[5]  M. Hill,et al.  Contribution of railway traffic to local PM10 concentrations in Switzerland , 2007 .

[6]  Per Kristiansson,et al.  Calibration of a new chamber using GUPIX software package for PIXE analysis , 2002 .

[7]  Timo Mäkelä,et al.  The concentrations and composition of and exposure to fine particles (PM2.5) in the Helsinki subway system , 2005 .

[8]  Å. Holgersson,et al.  Mechanisms related to the genotoxicity of particles in the subway and from other sources. , 2008, Chemical research in toxicology.

[9]  Tamás Weidinger,et al.  Time-resolved mass concentration, composition and sources of aerosol particles in a metropolitan underground railway station , 2007 .

[10]  Anders Ekberg,et al.  Emissions of particulate matters from railways – Emission factors and condition monitoring , 2010 .

[11]  A Seaton,et al.  The London Underground: dust and hazards to health , 2005, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[12]  C. Sioutas,et al.  Particulate matter (PM) concentrations in underground and ground-level rail systems of the Los Angeles Metro , 2011 .

[13]  Sheldon Landsberger,et al.  Characterization of the Gent Stacked Filter Unit PM10 Sampler , 1997 .

[14]  Lennart Möller,et al.  Subway particles are more genotoxic than street particles and induce oxidative stress in cultured human lung cells. , 2005, Chemical research in toxicology.

[15]  M Svartengren,et al.  Health effects of a subway environment in healthy volunteers , 2010, European Respiratory Journal.

[16]  Robert Gehrig,et al.  Particle emissions of a railway line determined by detailed single particle analysis , 2006 .

[17]  Christer Johansson,et al.  Particulate matter in the underground of Stockholm , 2002 .

[18]  H. Karlsson,et al.  Comparison of genotoxic and inflammatory effects of particles generated by wood combustion, a road simulator and collected from street and subway. , 2006, Toxicology letters.