Using the lens haptic plane concept and thick‐lens ray tracing to calculate intraocular lens power

Purpose: To develop a methodology for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in which the task of predicting the postoperative position of the IOL is separated from the calculation itself. Setting: Pharmacia, Groningen, The Netherlands. Methods: The minimum biometry input needed for IOL power calculation is the mean anterior corneal radius and axial length of the eye. The lens haptic plane (LHP) is the plane where the IOL haptics make contact with eye tissue. It is an anatomical site (eg, the equator of the capsular bag) and is independent of the IOL model. The position of the IOL optic in relation to the LHP is determined from the exact design of the IOL. Gullstrand's eye model is adopted to obtain the posterior corneal radius, thickness of the cornea, and refractive indices of the eye media. Thick‐lens ray tracing in the paraxial limit is used for the optical calculation. Results: A spreadsheet is given for the calculation. Conclusions: The methodology developed allows for IOL power calculation from first principles (ie, using true physical distances, radii, and refractive indices as input for the optical calculation).

[1]  O. Findl,et al.  Ray tracing for intraocular lens calculation , 2002, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[2]  S. Norrby,et al.  Prediction of intraocular lens power using the lens haptic plane concept , 1997, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[3]  Donald R. Sanders,et al.  Development of the SRK/T intraocular lens implant power calculation formula , 1990, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[4]  Valdemar Portney,et al.  Determining the imaging quality of intraocular lenses , 1998, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[5]  K. Hoffer,et al.  The Hoffer Q formula: A comparison of theoretic and regression formulas , 1993, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[6]  Valdemar Portney,et al.  Accuracy in determining intraocular lens dioptric power assessed by interlaboratory tests , 1996, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[7]  T. Olsen Theoretical approach to intraocular lens calculation using Gaussian optics , 1987, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[8]  B. Clark,et al.  Posterior corneal curvature. Correlations in normal eyes and in eyes involved with primary angle-closure glaucoma. , 1973, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[9]  J. Marshall,et al.  Shape and radius of posterior corneal surface. , 1993, Refractive & corneal surgery.

[10]  F. Fitzke,et al.  Refractive index of the human corneal epithelium and stroma. , 1995, Journal of refractive surgery.

[11]  S. Norrby Multicenter biometry study of 1 pair of eyes , 2001, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[12]  van der Heijde Gl The optical correction of unilateral aphakia. , 1976 .

[13]  N. Norrby The Lens Haptic Plane (LHP) a Fixed Reference for IOL Implant Power Calculation , 1995 .

[14]  Pablo Artal,et al.  Corneal optical aberrations and retinal image quality in patients in whom monofocal intraocular lenses were implanted. , 2002, Archives of ophthalmology.

[15]  J. W. Lewis,et al.  A three‐part system for refining intraocular lens power calculations , 1988, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[16]  Jack T. Holladay,et al.  Standardizing constants for ultrasonic biometry, keratometry, and intraocular lens power calculations , 1997, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[17]  P. Kiely,et al.  The Mean Shape of the Human Cornea , 1982 .

[18]  Rob G L van der Heijde,et al.  Radius and asphericity of the posterior corneal surface determined by corrected Scheimpflug photography. , 2002, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica.

[19]  S. Norrby,et al.  Comparison of 2 A‐scans , 2003, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.