Estimation techniques and simulation platforms for 77 GHz FMCW ACC radars

This paper presents two radar simulation platforms that have been developed and evaluated. One is based on the Advanced Design System (ADS) and the other on Matlab. Both platforms are modeled using homodyne front-end 77 GHz radar, based on commercially available monolithic microwave integrated circuits (MMIC). Known linear modulation formats such as the frequency modulation continuous wave (FMCW) and three-segment FMCW have been studied, and a new variant, the dual FMCW, is proposed for easier association between beat frequencies, while maintaining an excellent distance estimation of the targets. In the signal processing domain, new algorithms are proposed for the three-segment FMCW and for the dual FMCW. While both of these algorithms present the choice of either using complex or real data, the former allows faster signal processing, whereas the latter enables a simplified front-end architecture. The estimation performance of the modulation formats has been evaluated using the Cramer-Rao and Barankin bounds. It is found that the dual FMCW modulation format is slightly better than the other two formats tested in this work. A threshold effect is found at a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of 12 dB which means that, to be able to detect a target, the SNR should be above this value. In real hardware, the SNR detection limit should be set to about at least 15 dB.

[1]  Thierry Chonavel,et al.  Statistical Signal Processing , 2002 .

[2]  N. Levanon,et al.  RADAR SIGNALS , 2013 .

[3]  Steven Kay,et al.  Modern Spectral Estimation: Theory and Application , 1988 .

[4]  H. Rohling German radar symposium GRS 2000 , 2001 .

[5]  E. Moldovan,et al.  A new 77 GHz automotive phase coded CW multi-port radar sensor architecture , 2008, 2008 European Radar Conference.

[6]  Jean-Paul Artis,et al.  The radar in the automotive domain , 2005, Ann. des Télécommunications.

[7]  Pascal Larzabal,et al.  From Chapman-Robbins bound towards Barankin bound in threshold behaviour prediction , 2004 .

[8]  Shunji Miyahara New Algorithm for Multiple Object Detection in FM-CW Radar , 2004 .

[9]  M. Abbas,et al.  77 GHz ACC radar simulation platform , 2009, 2009 9th International Conference on Intelligent Transport Systems Telecommunications, (ITST).

[10]  N. Yamada Radar Cross Section for Pedestrian in 76 GHz Band Naoyuiki , 2004 .

[11]  J.S. Fu,et al.  Signal processing for automotive radar , 2005, IEEE International Radar Conference, 2005..

[12]  H. Rohling,et al.  SOME RADAR TOPICS: WAVEFORM DESIGN, RANGE CFAR AND TARGET RECOGNITION , 2006 .

[13]  A. Stelzer,et al.  A versatile FMCW radar system simulator for millimeter-wave applications , 2008, 2008 European Radar Conference.

[14]  J. Tabrikian,et al.  Barankin bound for range and Doppler estimation using orthogonal signal transmission , 2006, 2006 IEEE Conference on Radar.

[15]  Samuel S. Blackman,et al.  Design and Analysis of Modern Tracking Systems , 1999 .

[16]  Zhigang Li,et al.  Study on reducing false targets for automotive radar , 2004, Proceedings 7th International Conference on Signal Processing, 2004. Proceedings. ICSP '04. 2004..

[17]  Marc-Michael Meinecke,et al.  COMBINATION OF LFMCW AND FSK MODULATION PRINCIPLES FOR AUTOMOTIVE RADAR SYSTEMS Symposium Topic: Automotive Radar , 2000 .

[18]  K.M. Strohm,et al.  KOKON - automotive high frequency technology at 77/79 GHz , 2007, 2007 European Microwave Conference.

[19]  H. Rohling,et al.  OS CFAR performance in a 77 GHz radar sensor for car application , 1996, Proceedings of International Radar Conference.

[20]  E. Barankin Locally Best Unbiased Estimates , 1949 .

[21]  W. Wiesbeck,et al.  Extraction of Virtual Scattering Centers of Vehicles by Ray-Tracing Simulations , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[22]  K. Nishikawa,et al.  Radar cross section for pedestrian in 76GHz band , 2005, 2005 European Microwave Conference.

[23]  Alan V. Oppenheim,et al.  Discrete-Time Signal Pro-cessing , 1989 .