Understanding the formative stage of technological innovation system development: The case of natural gas as an automotive fuel

This study contributes to insights into mechanisms that influence the successes and failures of emerging energy technologies. It is assumed that for an emerging technology to fruitfully develop, it should be fostered by a Technological Innovation System (TIS), which is the network of actors, institutions and technologies in which it is embedded. For an emerging technology a TIS has yet to be built up. This research focuses on the dynamics of this build-up process by mapping the development of seven key activities: so-called system functions. The main contribution revolves around the notion of cumulative causation, or the phenomenon that the build-up of a TIS accelerates due to system functions reinforcing each other over time. As an empirical basis, an analysis is provided of the historical development of the TIS around automotive natural gas technology in the Netherlands (1970-2007). The results show that this TIS undergoes a gradual build-up in the 1970s, followed by a breakdown in the 1980s and, again, a build-up from 2000 to 2007. It is shown that underlying these trends are different forms of cumulative causation, here called motors of innovation. The study provides strategic insights for practitioners that aspire to support such motors of innovation.

[1]  G. Myrdal Economic theory and underdeveloped regions , 1965 .

[2]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Innovation systems: analytical and methodological issues , 2002 .

[3]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  Methods for Studying Innovation Development in the Minnesota Innovation Research Program , 1990 .

[4]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  The dynamics of sustainable innovation journeys , 2008, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[5]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Transforming the Energy Sector : The evolution of technological systems in renewable energy technology , 2004 .

[6]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Explaining the failure of the Dutch innovation system for biomass digestion : A functional analysis , 2007 .

[7]  R. J. Vermeulen,et al.  Evaluation of the environmental impact of modern passenger cars on petrol, diesel, automotive LPG and CNG , 2003 .

[8]  Stefan Kuhlmann,et al.  Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change , 2007 .

[9]  Raghu Garud,et al.  The innovation journey , 1999 .

[10]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Natural gas as an alternative to crude oil in automotive fuel chains well-to-wheel analysis and transition strategy development , 2005 .

[11]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Cumulative causation in biofuels development: a critical comparison of the Netherlands and Sweden , 2008, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[12]  David Ahlstrom,et al.  Technology assessment: a socio-cognitive perspective , 1997 .

[13]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  The bumpy road of biomass gasification in the Netherlands: Explaining the rise and fall of an emerging innovation system , 2008 .

[14]  D. North Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance: Economic performance , 1990 .

[15]  Stephen F. Shober,et al.  A Bumpy Road , 1997 .

[16]  R.A.A. Suurs,et al.  Motors of sustainable innovation : Towards a theory on the dynamics of technological innovation systems , 2009 .

[17]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Competition between first and second generation technologies: Lessons from the formation of a biofuels innovation system in the Netherlands , 2009 .

[18]  Tsungjuang Wang,et al.  Shaping and exploiting technological opportunities: The case of technology in Taiwan , 2010 .

[19]  Björn A. Sandén,et al.  ‘Legitimation’ and ‘development of positive externalities’: two key processes in the formation phase of technological innovation systems , 2008, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[20]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  The politics and policy of energy system transformation—explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology , 2006 .

[21]  Wim Turkenburg,et al.  The performance of the Norwegian carbon dioxide, capture and storage innovation system , 2009 .

[22]  Jochen Markard,et al.  Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework , 2008 .

[23]  Wei Li,et al.  Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[24]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  The diffusion of renewable energy technology: an analytical framework and key issues for research , 2000 .

[25]  Anna Bergek,et al.  Shaping and Exploiting Technological Opportunities: The Case of Renewable Energy Technology in Sweden , 2002 .

[26]  John P. Holdren,et al.  Assessing the global energy innovation system: some key issues , 2002 .

[27]  M. Hekkert,et al.  Cumulative causation in the formation of a technological innovation system: The case of biofuels in the Netherlands , 2009 .

[28]  Björn A. Sandén,et al.  Near-term technology policies for long-term climate targets—economy wide versus technology specific approaches , 2005 .

[29]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  The ongoing energy transition: Lessons from a socio-technical, multi-level analysis of the Dutch electricity system (1960-2004) , 2007 .