Walking combined with reach-to-grasp while crossing obstacles at different distances.

BACKGROUND Obstacle avoidance and object prehension occur regularly in real-world environments (walking up/down steps and opening a door). However, it is not known how walking and prehension change when there is an increase in the level of difficulty of the walking task. RESEARCH QUESTION We investigated the changes in walking and reach-tograsp when performing these two motor skills concomitantly in the presence of an obstacle on the ground positioned in different locations in relation to the object-to-be-grasped. METHODS Fifteen young adults walked and grasped a dowel placed on a support with the obstacle positioned at the step before (N-1), during (N) and after (N + 1) the prehension task. RESULTS The prehension task did not affect leading limb obstacle negotiation. Toe clearance and maximum toe elevation were lesser at obstacle position N + 1 than at obstacle position N-1 when combining grasping and obstacle-crossing task for the trailing limb. Step width increased in the presence of the obstacle-crossing task independent of obstacle location. The correlation between foot position before the obstacle and toe clearance revealed that the addition of the prehension task disrupted the relationship between these variables for the trailing limb. Foot placement and limb elevation were unaffected by the prehension task. The reaching component was unaffected by the increased level of difficulty of the walking task. The grasping component was affected by the increased level of difficulty of the walking task, as the time to peak grip aperture occurred earlier in the presence of the obstacle at position N, and may indicate a cautious strategy to grasp the dowel successfully. SIGNIFICANCE Our results showed that prospective control is affected after the prehension since the attention to grasping may have impaired the acquisition of visual information for planning the trailing limb elevation.

[1]  Michel Desmurget,et al.  The effect of viewing the static hand prior to movement onset on pointing kinematics and variability , 1994, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  Chou,et al.  Increasing obstacle height and decreasing toe-obstacle distance affect the joint moments of the stance limb differently when stepping over an obstacle. , 1998, Gait & posture.

[3]  Scott T. Grafton.  The cognitive neuroscience of prehension: recent developments , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  Renato Moraes,et al.  Prehension Combined With Gait in Individuals With Chronic Low Back Pain. , 2017, Motor control.

[5]  T. Bhatt,et al.  Effect of type of cognitive task and walking speed on cognitive-motor interference during dual-task walking , 2014, Neuroscience.

[6]  David N. Lee,et al.  Regulation of gait in long jumping. , 1982 .

[7]  T. Drew,et al.  Taking the next step: cortical contributions to the control of locomotion , 2015, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[8]  Marcus Fraga Vieira,et al.  Local dynamic stability and gait variability during attentional tasks in young adults. , 2017, Gait & posture.

[9]  Renato Moraes,et al.  Changes in interlimb coordination during walking and grasping task in older adult fallers and non-fallers. , 2017, Human movement science.

[10]  Renato Moraes,et al.  Gait and reach-to-grasp movements are mutually modified when performed simultaneously. , 2015, Human movement science.

[11]  Renato Moraes,et al.  The effects of distant and on-line visual information on the control of approach phase and step over an obstacle during locomotion , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  Michael Greig,et al.  Any way you look at it, successful obstacle negotiation needs visually guided on-line foot placement regulation during the approach phase , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.

[13]  J B J Smeets,et al.  Do obstacles affect the selection of grasping points? , 2012, Human movement science.

[14]  A E Patla,et al.  Where and when do we look as we approach and step over an obstacle in the travel path? , 1997, Neuroreport.

[15]  Aftab E Patla,et al.  Visual feedforward control in human locomotion during avoidance of obstacles that change size. , 2010, Motor control.

[16]  L. Draganich,et al.  Placing the trailing foot closer to an obstacle reduces flexion of the hip, knee, and ankle to increase the risk of tripping. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  R. Moraes,et al.  Older adults with history of falls are unable to perform walking and prehension movements simultaneously , 2016, Neuroscience.

[18]  A. Patla,et al.  Locomotor Patterns of the Leading and the Trailing Limbs as Solid and Fragile Obstacles Are Stepped Over: Some Insights Into the Role of Vision During Locomotion. , 1996, Journal of motor behavior.

[19]  Prudence Plummer,et al.  Texting and walking: effect of environmental setting and task prioritization on dual-task interference in healthy young adults. , 2015, Gait & posture.

[20]  Jody C. Culham,et al.  Mental blocks: fMRI reveals top-down modulation of early visual cortex when obstacles interfere with grasp planning , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  Valentina Graci,et al.  The role of lower peripheral visual cues in the visuomotor coordination of locomotion and prehension. , 2011, Gait & posture.

[22]  Matthew A Timmis,et al.  Obstacle crossing during locomotion: visual exproprioceptive information is used in an online mode to update foot placement before the obstacle but not swing trajectory over it. , 2012, Gait & posture.

[23]  B. McFadyen,et al.  The combined control of locomotion and prehension , 1996 .

[24]  Leigh W. Bloomfield,et al.  The contribution of vision, proprioception, and efference copy in storing a neural representation for guiding trail leg trajectory over an obstacle. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.