Closed-loop tomographic control on HOMER wide-field AO bench: experimental results and identification issues

Adaptive Optics (AO) has a limited corrected field of view because of the anisoplanatism effect. Wide Field AO (WFAO) concepts, such as Multi-Conjugate AO (MCAO), have been developed to overcome this limitation. These complex WFAO systems raise critical challenges such as tomographic control and calibrations. We present new results obtained in closed-loop configuration with the laboratory bench HOMER which is devoted to implementation and validation of these WFAO concepts in the perspective of future VLT/ELT AO systems. Turbulence is generated with rotating phase screens and multi-directional analysis is performed. Tomographic control relies on Linear Quadratic Gaussian control (LQG). The correction can be applied thanks to two Deformable Mirrors (DM). We also focus on calibration issues and models identification. We investigate in particular identification of relative geometry of the wave front sensors, DM altitude and asterism and its impact on performance.

[1]  C. Kulcsár,et al.  Wide field adaptive optics laboratory demonstration with closed-loop tomographic control. , 2010, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[2]  Jacques M. Beckers,et al.  Increasing the size of the isoplanatic patch with multiconjugate adaptive optics. , 1988 .

[3]  N. Hubin,et al.  Ground Layer Adaptive Optics , 2005 .

[4]  Caroline Dessenne,et al.  Commande modale et predictive en optique adaptative , 1998 .

[5]  Richard W. Wilson,et al.  SLODAR: measuring optical turbulence altitude with a Shack–Hartmann wavefront sensor , 2002 .

[6]  D. Marquardt An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters , 1963 .

[7]  Roberto Ragazzoni,et al.  LINC-NIRVANA: MCAO toward Extremely Large Telescopes , 2005 .

[8]  F. Rigaut Ground Conjugate Wide Field Adaptive Optics for the ELTs , 2002 .

[9]  L. Mugnier,et al.  Calibration of NAOS and CONICA static aberrations - Application of the phase diversity technique , 2003 .

[10]  Y. Bar-Shalom,et al.  Dual effect, certainty equivalence, and separation in stochastic control , 1974 .

[11]  Brent L. Ellerbroek Wavefront reconstruction algorithms and simulation results for multiconjugate adaptive optics on giant telescopes , 2004, Extremely Large Telescopes.

[12]  D. Joseph,et al.  On linear control theory , 1961, Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, Part II: Applications and Industry.

[13]  Thierry Fusco,et al.  Calibration and precompensation of noncommon path aberrations for extreme adaptive optics. , 2007, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[14]  Byron M. Welsh,et al.  Analysis of Multiconjugate Adaptive Optics , 1992, Adaptive Optics for Large Telescopes.

[15]  Jean-Marc Conan,et al.  Linear quadratic Gaussian control for adaptive optics and multiconjugate adaptive optics: experimental and numerical analysis. , 2009, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[16]  A. Costille Les optiques adaptatives grand champ : stratégie de correction et validations expérimentales , 2009 .

[17]  Jean-Marc Conan,et al.  Optimal control, observers and integrators in adaptive optics. , 2006, Optics express.