Balancing revisability and robustness? A new institutionalist perspective on local government modernization

This article focuses upon one particular aspect of new institutionalist thinking – that which analyses the scope for, and constraints upon, deliberate interventions in institutional change. New institutionalist insights are used to illuminate the challenges faced by the British Labour government in its programme for modernizing local government. The focus is upon two core concepts: robustness and revisability – a pairing which highlights the potential contradictions that exist within the new institutionalist approach to design. It is argued that New Labour struggled to achieve a balance between these key design criteria during its first term, with revisability increasingly sacrificed in favour of robustness. In its second term in office (since June 2001), Labour has sought to rebalance robustness and revisability, largely through the principle of ‘earned autonomy’. In this context the values informing the institutional redesign of local government have become less clear and more contested, and there has been a progressive shift from commitment-based to control-based strategies for change.

[1]  Vivien Lowndes Change in public service management: New institutions and new managerial regimes , 1997 .

[2]  S. Nutley,et al.  Getting Research into Practice: Implementing What Works with Offenders—The Effective Practice Initiative , 2000 .

[3]  George Boyne,et al.  Developments: External Regulation and Best Value in Local Government , 2000 .

[4]  Torsten Svensson,et al.  Walter J.M. Kickert, Erik-Hans Kilijn and Joop F.M. Koppenjan (1997) Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector. London: Sage. , 2000 .

[5]  T. Blair The third way: New politics for the new century , 1998 .

[6]  Gerry Stoker,et al.  Enhancing public participation in local government , 1998 .

[7]  Johan P. Olsen,et al.  The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life , 1983, American Political Science Review.

[8]  David Wilson,et al.  Unravelling Control Freakery: Redefining Central-Local Government Relations , 2003 .

[9]  M. Geddes,et al.  The Modernization and Improvement of Government and Public Services: Deepening Democracy or Élite Governance? New Political Management Arrangements in Local Government , 2000 .

[10]  C. Hood,et al.  The Art of the State: Culture, Rhetoric, and Public Management , 1998 .

[11]  Bo Rothstein Political Institutions: An Overview , 1998 .

[12]  Vivien Lowndes Between Rhetoric and Reality: Does the 2001 White Paper Reverse the Centralising Trend in Britain? , 2002, Regulating Local Authorities.

[13]  Jon Pierre,et al.  Models of Urban Governance , 1999 .

[14]  Grant Jordan Policy Community Realism versus ‘New’ Institutionalist Ambiguity , 1990 .

[15]  Peter C Smith,et al.  What works?Evidence-based policy and practice in public services , 2000 .

[16]  George A. Boyne Managing Local Services: From CCT to Best Value , 1999 .

[17]  B. Peters Institutional Theory in Political Science: The New Institutionalism , 1999 .

[18]  I. Sanderson Evaluation, Policy Learning and Evidence-Based Policy Making , 2002 .

[19]  Lyndsay Rashman,et al.  Leading and learning? Knowledge transfer in the Beacon Council Scheme , 2002 .

[20]  Janet Newman,et al.  Modernizing Governance: New Labour, Policy and Society , 2001 .

[21]  D. Luban,et al.  The Theory of Institutional Design: The Publicity Principle , 1996 .

[22]  Steve Martin,et al.  Implementing ‘Best Value’: Local Public Services in Transition , 2000 .

[23]  G. Stoker Life is a lottery: New Labour’s strategy for the reform of devolved governance , 2002 .

[24]  Gerry Stoker,et al.  Trends in Public Participation: Part 2 – Citizens' Perspectives , 2001 .

[25]  Josie Kelly,et al.  Labour's modernization of local government , 2000 .

[26]  Robert E. Goodin,et al.  The Theory of Institutional Design: Institutions and Their Design , 1996 .

[27]  Vivien Lowndes,et al.  Rescuing Aunt Sally: Taking Institutional Theory Seriously in Urban Politics , 2001 .

[28]  David Wilson,et al.  Rethinking local political leadership , 2002 .

[29]  Vivien Lowndes Rebuilding trust in central/local relations: Policy or passion? , 1999 .

[30]  Gerry Stoker,et al.  Trends In Public Participation: Part 1 – Local Government Perspectives , 2001 .

[31]  Claus Offe,et al.  Designing Institutions for East European Transitions , 1994 .

[32]  Peter Bogason,et al.  Public policy and local governance : institutions in postmodern society , 2001 .

[33]  David Wilson Local Government: Balancing Diversity and Uniformity , 2001 .

[34]  Gerry Stoker,et al.  Introduction: The Unintended Costs and Benefits of New Management Reform for British Local Government , 1999 .

[35]  S. Martin,et al.  Evaluating the Best Value Pilot Programme: Measuring 'Success' and 'Improvement' , 2002 .

[36]  David Wilson,et al.  Urban Elites in England: New Models of Executive Governance , 2004 .

[37]  J. Stewart The nature of British local government , 2000 .

[38]  S. Leach,et al.  Public participation and the democratic renewal agenda: Prioritisation or marginalisation? , 1999 .

[39]  Walter J. Campbell,et al.  Time to Speak Up , 1971 .

[40]  C. Painter Public service reform from Thatcher to Blair: a third way , 1999 .

[41]  T. Blair Leading the way : a new vision for local government , 1998 .

[42]  J. Davies The Hollowing-out of Local Democracy and the ‘Fatal Conceit’ of Governing without Government , 2000 .

[43]  A. Finlayson Third Way Theory , 1999 .

[44]  John S. Dryzek,et al.  The Theory of Institutional Design: The Informal Logic of Institutional Design , 1996 .

[45]  Robert E. Goodin,et al.  The Theory of Institutional Design , 1998 .

[46]  Robert E. Goodin,et al.  Political Science: The Discipline , 1998 .

[47]  M. Temple New Labour's Third Way: Pragmatism and Governance , 2000 .

[48]  M. Geddes,et al.  The policy and politics of Best Value: currents, crosscurrents and undercurrents in the new regime , 2000 .

[49]  M. Bevir New Labour: A Study in Ideology , 2000 .