Provable Guarantees for General Two-sided Sequential Matching Markets

Two-sided markets have become increasingly more important during the last years, mostly because of their numerous applications in housing, labor and dating. Consumer-supplier matching platforms pose several technical challenges, specially due to the trade-off between recommending suitable suppliers to consumers and avoiding collisions among consumers' preferences. In this work, we study a general version of the two-sided sequential matching model introduced by Ashlagi et al. (2019). The setting is the following: we (the platform) offer a menu of suppliers to each consumer. Then, every consumer selects, simultaneously and independently, to match with a supplier or to remain unmatched. Suppliers observe the subset of consumers that selected them, and choose either to match a consumer or leave the system. Finally, a match takes place if both the consumer and the supplier sequentially select each other. Each agent's behavior is probabilistic and determined by a regular discrete choice model. Our objective is to choose an assortment family that maximizes the expected cardinality of the matching. Given the computational complexity of the problem, we show several provable guarantees for the general model, which in particular, significantly improve the approximation factors previously obtained.

[1]  Yashodhan Kanoria,et al.  Facilitating the Search for Partners on Matching Platforms: Restricting Agent Actions , 2017, EC.

[2]  Laurence A. Wolsey,et al.  Best Algorithms for Approximating the Maximum of a Submodular Set Function , 1978, Math. Oper. Res..

[3]  J. Horton The Effects of Algorithmic Labor Market Recommendations: Evidence from a Field Experiment , 2015, Journal of Labor Economics.

[4]  Nicole Immorlica,et al.  Two-sided matching with partial information , 2013, EC '13.

[5]  Danny Segev,et al.  The Approximability of Assortment Optimization Under Ranking Preferences , 2015, Oper. Res..

[6]  Bruno Ribeiro,et al.  Online dating recommendations: matching markets and learning preferences , 2014, WWW.

[7]  J. Schummer,et al.  Revenue from matching platforms , 2021 .

[8]  Nestor Duch-Brown,et al.  The competitive landscape of online platforms , 2017 .

[9]  J. Rochet,et al.  Platform competition in two sided markets , 2003 .

[10]  Jan Vondrák,et al.  Maximizing a Monotone Submodular Function Subject to a Matroid Constraint , 2011, SIAM J. Comput..

[11]  David Manlove,et al.  Selected open problems in Matching Under Preferences , 2019, Bull. EATCS.

[12]  Gwenaël Joret,et al.  Assortment Optimisation under a General Discrete Choice Model: A Tight Analysis of Revenue-Ordered Assortments , 2017, EC.

[13]  Eric van Damme,et al.  Market Definition in Two-Sided Markets: Theory and Practice , 2014 .

[14]  M. L. Fisher,et al.  An analysis of approximations for maximizing submodular set functions—I , 1978, Math. Program..

[15]  Leonard N. Stern A Partial-Order-Based Model to Estimate Individual Preferences using Panel Data , 2016 .

[16]  P. Doyle,et al.  Random utility models in marketing research: a survey , 2001 .

[17]  Danny Segev,et al.  Capacity Constrained Assortment Optimization Under the Markov Chain Based Choice Model , 2015 .

[18]  Jan Vondrák,et al.  Optimal approximation for the submodular welfare problem in the value oracle model , 2008, STOC.

[19]  David Manlove,et al.  Algorithmics of Matching Under Preferences , 2013, Bull. EATCS.

[20]  M. Fisher,et al.  Assortment Planning: Review of Literature and Industry Practice , 2008 .

[21]  Lanfei Shi,et al.  Your Preference or Mine? A Randomized Field Experiment on Recommender Systems in Two-sided Matching Markets , 2021, ICIS.

[22]  Andrey Fradkin,et al.  Search Frictions and the Design of Online Marketplaces , 2015, AMMA 2015.

[23]  R. Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis. , 1960 .

[24]  G. Gallego,et al.  Assortment Planning Under the Multinomial Logit Model with Totally Unimodular Constraint Structures , 2013 .

[25]  P. Rusmevichientong,et al.  Assortment Optimization under the Multinomial Logit Model with Random Choice Parameters , 2014 .

[26]  Ryan Webb,et al.  The (Neural) Dynamics of Stochastic Choice , 2019, Manag. Sci..

[27]  Nicholas Mattei,et al.  Stable Matching with Uncertain Linear Preferences , 2016, Algorithmica.

[28]  Daniel Lehmann,et al.  Combinatorial auctions with decreasing marginal utilities , 2001, EC '01.

[29]  Danny Segev,et al.  Assortment Optimization Under the Mallows model , 2016, NIPS.

[30]  David B. Shmoys,et al.  Dynamic Assortment Optimization with a Multinomial Logit Choice Model and Capacity Constraint , 2010, Oper. Res..

[31]  Hanna Halaburda,et al.  Competing by Restricting Choice: The Case of Search Platforms , 2016 .

[32]  L. Thurstone A law of comparative judgment. , 1994 .

[33]  Itai Ashlagi,et al.  Assortment planning for two-sided sequential matching markets , 2019, ArXiv.

[34]  Carlos Riquelme,et al.  Pricing in Ride-Sharing Platforms: A Queueing-Theoretic Approach , 2015, EC.

[35]  G. Ryzin,et al.  On the Relationship Between Inventory Costs and Variety Benefits in Retailassortments , 1999 .

[36]  Gerardo Berbeglia,et al.  Discrete Choice Models Based on Random Walks , 2016, Oper. Res. Lett..

[37]  Maxim Sviridenko,et al.  Pipage Rounding: A New Method of Constructing Algorithms with Proven Performance Guarantee , 2004, J. Comb. Optim..

[38]  Juan José Miranda Bront,et al.  A Column Generation Algorithm for Choice-Based Network Revenue Management , 2008, Oper. Res..

[39]  Huseyin Topaloglu,et al.  Assortment Optimization Under Variants of the Nested Logit Model , 2014, Oper. Res..

[40]  Günter J. Hitsch,et al.  Matching and Sorting in Online Dating , 2008 .

[41]  J. Blanchet,et al.  A markov chain approximation to choice modeling , 2013, EC '13.

[42]  Marc Rysman The Economics of Two-Sided Markets , 2009 .

[43]  Vahab S. Mirrokni,et al.  Maximizing Non-Monotone Submodular Functions , 2011, 48th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS'07).

[44]  John Joseph Horton,et al.  Online Labor Markets , 2010, WINE.

[45]  R. Johari,et al.  Managing Congestion in Matching Markets , 2015, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[46]  C. L. Mallows NON-NULL RANKING MODELS. I , 1957 .

[47]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis , 1979 .

[48]  Ronald de Haan,et al.  Pareto optimal allocation under uncertain preferences: uncertainty models, algorithms, and complexity , 2019, Artif. Intell..

[49]  Thomas Brendan Murphy,et al.  Mixtures of distance-based models for ranking data , 2003, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[50]  Vikram Manjunath,et al.  The impossibility of strategy-proof, Pareto efficient, and individually rational rules for fractional matching , 2020, Games Econ. Behav..

[51]  D. McFadden Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[52]  A. Culyer Thurstone’s Law of Comparative Judgment , 2014 .