Object-fate analysis - spatial relationships for the assessment of object transition and correspondence

In the near future several new highest resolution, next generation satellites will be launched with panchromatic half-meter resolution imagery, e.g. WorldView 1 and 2. The ever increasing supply of high-resolution imagery seeks for adequate, i.e. more effective, more automated and reliable methods for image processing and interpretation. At the interface of geographic information science and remote sensing, object-based image analysis methodologies provide a solid basis for exploiting imagery more intelligently. Working with image objects enables (1) single feature, specific information extraction, (2) performing complex classifications and multi-scale representations and (3) spatial analysis and modeling. However, deriving image objects from various sources and in different scales implies the problem of generating inconsistent boundaries. To specifically address this challenge, a tool called LIST (landscape interpretation support tool) is used, which, based on a straight-forward principle, analyses the spatial relationships of image objects, i.e. their correspondence and their changes over time. The chapter presents a methodological discussion and preliminary results from an ongoing study on ‘object fate analysis’ (OFA). OFA means the investigation of object transition (change over time) or object correspondence (different delineations or representations). The concept and the application of OFA are illustrated by two case-studies representing both aspects. The first one carried out in medium scale uses Landsat TM and ETM imagery and shows an example of performing change assessment as well as object-based accuracy assessment. The second fine-scale study is based on SPOT 5 scenes and demonstrates how object correspondence can be assessed on two different object representations, machine-based segmentation and manual delineation.

[1]  Andrew T. Hudak,et al.  Trends in fire patterns in a southern African savanna under alternative land use practices , 2004 .

[2]  M. Egenhofer Pre-processing queries with spatial constraints , 1994 .

[3]  Patrick Hostert,et al.  Cross-border comparison of land cover and landscape pattern in Eastern Europe using a hybrid classification technique , 2006 .

[4]  G. Langran Time in Geographic Information Systems , 1990 .

[5]  Arno Schäpe,et al.  Multiresolution Segmentation : an optimization approach for high quality multi-scale image segmentation , 2000 .

[6]  M. Turner Spatial and temporal analysis of landscape patterns , 1990, Landscape Ecology.

[7]  David J. Maguire,et al.  Geographical Information Systems , 1993 .

[8]  Csaba Csaki,et al.  Agricultural reforms in Central and Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union , 2000 .

[9]  Joseph Strobl,et al.  Angewandte Geoinformatik 2007 , 2007 .

[10]  H. Nagendra,et al.  Land cover change and landscape fragmentation—comparing the utility of continuous and discrete analyses for a western Honduras region , 2004 .

[11]  Tobias Langanke,et al.  Strukturelle Indikatoren zur Beurteilung von Habitatqualität im europäischen Naturschutz , 2004 .

[12]  Max J. Egenhofer,et al.  Identity-based change: a foundation for spatio-temporal knowledge representation , 2000, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[13]  David J. Maguire,et al.  Geographical information systems : principles and applications , 1991 .

[14]  D. Tiede,et al.  Adapting, splitting and merging cadastral boundaries according to homogenous LULC types derived from spot 5 data , 2007 .

[15]  D. Mishra,et al.  Change detection and landscape metrics for inferring anthropogenic processes in the greater EFMO area , 2004 .

[16]  Dirk Tiede,et al.  Einsatz von GIS und objekt-basierter Analyse von Fernerkundungsdaten in der regionalen Planung: Methoden und erste Erfahrungen aus dem Biotopinformations- und Managementsystem (BIMS) Region Stuttgart , 2007 .

[17]  Cynthia Croissant,et al.  Landscape patterns and parcel boundaries: an analysis of composition and configuration of land use and land cover in south-central Indiana , 2004 .

[18]  Thomas Blaschke,et al.  Habitatmodelle – Methodik, Anwendung, Nutzen , 2004 .

[19]  Tobias Langanke,et al.  Combined object-based classification and manual interpretation–synergies for a quantitative assessment of parcels and biotopes , 2009 .

[20]  R. O'Neill,et al.  Landscape Ecology Explained@@@Landscape Ecology in Theory and Practice: Pattern and Process , 2001 .

[21]  Pol Coppin,et al.  Review ArticleDigital change detection methods in ecosystem monitoring: a review , 2004 .

[22]  E. Lambin,et al.  Impact of data integration technique on historical land-use/land-cover change: Comparing historical maps with remote sensing data in the Belgian Ardennes , 2002, Landscape Ecology.

[23]  Kelley A. Crews-Meyer,et al.  Agricultural landscape change and stability in northeast Thailand: historical patch-level analysis , 2004 .

[24]  Kurt H. Riitters,et al.  Sensitivity of selected landscape pattern metrics to land-cover misclassification and differences in land-cover composition , 1997 .

[25]  J. Nassauer,et al.  Limitations of using landscape pattern indices to evaluate the ecological consequences of alternative plans and designs , 2005 .