Is there any connection between the network morphology and the fluctuations of the stock market index

Models which consider behavioral aspects of the investors have attracted increasing interest in the Finance and Econophysics literature in the last years. Different behavioral profiles (imitation, anti-imitation, indifference) were proposed for the investors, which take their decision based on their trust network (neighborhood). Results from agent-based models have shown that most of the features observed in actual stock market indices can be replicated in simulations. Here, we present a deeper investigation of an agent based model considering different network morphologies (regular, random, small-world) for the investors’ trust network, in an attempt to answer the question raised in the title. We study the model by considering four scenarios for the investors and different initial conditions to analyze their influence in the stock market fluctuations. We have characterized the stationary limit for each scenario tested, focusing on the changes introduced when complex networks were used, and calculated the Hurst exponent in some cases. Simulations showed interesting results suggesting that the fluctuations of the stock market index are strongly affected by the network morphology, a remarkable result which we believe was never reported or predicted before.

[1]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[2]  Blake LeBaron,et al.  The Impact of Imitation on Long Memory in an Order-Driven Market , 2008 .

[3]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[4]  Francisco Louçã,et al.  Modeling a Multi-Agents System as a Network: A Metaphoric Exploration of the Unexpected , 2009, Int. J. Agent Technol. Syst..

[5]  D. Sornette Why Stock Markets Crash: Critical Events in Complex Financial Systems , 2017 .

[6]  Sergey N. Dorogovtsev,et al.  Critical phenomena in complex networks , 2007, ArXiv.

[7]  H. Lavicka,et al.  Evolution of imitation networks in Minority Game model , 2007 .

[8]  Neil F Johnson,et al.  Impact of unexpected events, shocking news, and rumors on foreign exchange market dynamics. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[9]  Roger B. Myerson,et al.  Game theory - Analysis of Conflict , 1991 .

[10]  Neil F. Johnson,et al.  Application of multi-agent games to the prediction of financial time-series , 2001 .

[11]  E. Burgos,et al.  The evolutionary minority game with local coordination , 2002 .

[12]  M. Marsili,et al.  Minority Games: Interacting agents in financial markets , 2014 .

[13]  Hassan Khosravi,et al.  A social network model of investment behaviour in the stock market , 2010 .

[14]  Mark Newman,et al.  Models of the Small World , 2000 .

[15]  S. N. Dorogovtsev,et al.  Evolution of networks , 2001, cond-mat/0106144.

[16]  B. Bollobás The evolution of random graphs , 1984 .

[17]  Giulia Iori,et al.  Socioeconomic networks with long-range interactions. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[18]  G. Iori,et al.  The role of communication and imitation in limit order markets , 2009 .

[19]  A. Kirman Complex Economics: Individual and Collective Rationality , 2010 .

[20]  R. Palmer,et al.  Time series properties of an artificial stock market , 1999 .

[21]  P. M. Hui,et al.  Crowd–anticrowd theory of the minority game , 2001 .

[22]  M. Schreckenberg Modeling Complex Systems , 2004 .

[23]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Statistical mechanics of complex networks , 2001, ArXiv.

[24]  J. Bouchaud,et al.  Theory Of Financial Risk And Derivative Pricing , 2000 .

[25]  Daniel O. Cajueiro,et al.  Enforcing social behavior in an Ising model with complex neighborhoods , 2011 .

[26]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[27]  B. LeBaron Agent-based Computational Finance , 2006 .

[28]  H. Markowitz Market Efficiency: A Theoretical Distinction and So What? , 2005 .

[29]  R. Mantegna,et al.  Long-range correlation properties of coding and noncoding DNA sequences: GenBank analysis. , 1995, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[30]  J. Neumann,et al.  Theory of games and economic behavior , 1945, 100 Years of Math Milestones.

[31]  A.C.C. Coolen,et al.  Generating functional analysis of minority games with inner product strategy definitions , 2007, 0712.0153.

[32]  B. M. Tabak,et al.  The Hurst exponent over time: testing the assertion that emerging markets are becoming more efficient , 2004 .

[33]  Jurgen Kurths,et al.  Synchronization in complex networks , 2008, 0805.2976.

[34]  P M Hui,et al.  Generalized strategies in the minority game. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[35]  Rosario N. Mantegna,et al.  Book Review: An Introduction to Econophysics, Correlations, and Complexity in Finance, N. Rosario, H. Mantegna, and H. E. Stanley, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. , 2000 .

[36]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  The effect of investor psychology on the complexity of stock market: An analysis based on cellular automaton model , 2009, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[37]  Colin Camerer Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction , 2003 .

[38]  A. Vespignani,et al.  Competition among memes in a world with limited attention , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[39]  Roberto F. S. Andrade,et al.  Network evolution based on minority game with herding behavior , 2010 .

[40]  Blake LeBaron,et al.  Chaos and nonlinear forecastability in economics and finance , 1994, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[41]  M. Newman,et al.  Random graphs with arbitrary degree distributions and their applications. , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[42]  S. Fortunato,et al.  Statistical physics of social dynamics , 2007, 0710.3256.

[43]  Sylvie Oliffson Kamphorst,et al.  On the fractal dimension of self-affine profiles , 1994 .

[44]  Matthew O. Jackson,et al.  Identifying Community Structures from Network Data via Maximum Likelihood Methods , 2009 .

[45]  Bruna Amin Gonçalves,et al.  Influence of the Investor’s Behavior on the Complexity of the Stock Market , 2012 .

[46]  P. Hui,et al.  The minority game with different payoff functions: crowd–anticrowd theory , 2003 .

[47]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  The cellular automaton model of investment behavior in the stock market , 2003 .

[48]  Blake LeBaron,et al.  Agent-based computational finance : Suggested readings and early research , 2000 .