Molecular Mechanism of Regulation of RhoA GTPase by Phosphorylation of RhoGDI

Rho-specific guanine dissociation inhibitors (RhoGDIs) play a crucial role in the regulation of Rho family GTPases. They act as negative regulators that prevent the activation of Rho GTPases by forming complexes with the inactive GDP-bound state of GTPase. Release of Rho GTPase from the RhoGDI-bound complex is necessary for Rho GTPase activation. Biochemical studies provide evidence of a “phosphorylation code”, where phosphorylation of some specific residues of RhoGDI selectively releases its GTPase partner (RhoA, Rac1, Cdc42 etc.). This work attempts to understand the molecular mechanism behind this phosphorylation code. Using several microseconds long atomistic molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of the wild-type and phosphorylated states of the RhoA–RhoGDI complex, we propose a molecular-interaction-based mechanistic model for the dissociation of the complex. Phosphorylation induces major structural changes, particularly in the positively charged polybasic region (PBR) of RhoA and the negatively charged N-terminal region of RhoGDI that contribute most to the binding affinity. MM-PBSA binding free energy calculations show a significant weakening of interaction on phosphorylation at the RhoA-specific site of RhoGDI. In contrast, phosphorylation at a Rac1-specific site leads to the strengthening of the interaction confirming the presence of a phosphorylation code. RhoA-specific phosphorylation leads to a reduction in the number of contacts between the PBR of RhoA and the N-terminal region of RhoGDI, which manifests reduction of the binding affinity. Using hydrogen bond occupancy analysis and energetic perturbation network, we propose a mechanistic model for the allosteric response, i.e., long range signal propagation from the site of phosphorylation to the PBR and buried geranylgeranyl group in the form of rearrangement and rewiring of hydrogen bonds and salt bridges. Our results highlight the crucial role of specific electrostatic interactions in manifestation of the phosphorylation code.

[1]  Amit Kumawat,et al.  Protonation-Induced Dynamic Allostery in PDZ Domain: Evidence of Perturbation-Independent Universal Response Network. , 2020, The journal of physical chemistry letters.

[2]  Hee-Gu Lee,et al.  Regulation of Rho GTPases by RhoGDIs in Human Cancers , 2019, Cells.

[3]  Patrice Koehl,et al.  Faculty Opinions recommendation of OpenMM 7: Rapid development of high performance algorithms for molecular dynamics. , 2018, Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature.

[4]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Energetic redistribution in allostery to execute protein function , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Amit Kumawat,et al.  Hidden electrostatic basis of dynamic allostery in a PDZ domain , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Amit Kumawat,et al.  Nucleotide Dependent Switching in Rho GTPase: Conformational Heterogeneity and Competing Molecular Interactions , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[7]  Vijay S. Pande,et al.  OpenMM 7: Rapid development of high performance algorithms for molecular dynamics , 2016, bioRxiv.

[8]  Ozlem Keskin,et al.  Ras Conformational Ensembles, Allostery, and Signaling. , 2016, Chemical reviews.

[9]  Berk Hess,et al.  GROMACS: High performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers , 2015 .

[10]  Rajendra Kumar,et al.  g_mmpbsa - A GROMACS Tool for High-Throughput MM-PBSA Calculations , 2014, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[11]  Massimiliano Bonomi,et al.  PLUMED 2: New feathers for an old bird , 2013, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[12]  Jing Huang,et al.  CHARMM36 all‐atom additive protein force field: Validation based on comparison to NMR data , 2013, J. Comput. Chem..

[13]  Takashi Nakamura,et al.  Negative Charges in the Flexible N-Terminal Domain of Rho GDP-Dissociation Inhibitors (RhoGDIs) Regulate the Targeting of the RhoGDI–Rac1 Complex to Membranes , 2013, The Journal of Immunology.

[14]  Leslie M. Loew,et al.  Computational Analysis of Rho GTPase Cycling , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[15]  Alan Hall,et al.  Rho family GTPases. , 2012, Biochemical Society transactions.

[16]  Herbert Waldmann,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Prenylated RhoA Interaction with Its Chaperone, RhoGDI* , 2012, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[17]  Keith Burridge,et al.  The 'invisible hand': regulation of RHO GTPases by RHOGDIs , 2011, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[18]  P. Hordijk,et al.  The role of ubiquitylation and degradation in RhoGTPase signalling , 2010, Journal of Cell Science.

[19]  John R. Couchman,et al.  Serine 34 Phosphorylation of Rho Guanine Dissociation Inhibitor (RhoGDIα) Links Signaling from Conventional Protein Kinase C to RhoGTPase in Cell Adhesion* , 2010, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[20]  F. Huang,et al.  Phosphorylation of GTP dissociation inhibitor by PKA negatively regulates RhoA. , 2008, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[21]  J Andrew McCammon,et al.  Mapping the nucleotide and isoform-dependent structural and dynamical features of Ras proteins. , 2008, Structure.

[22]  Arun Roy,et al.  GDI-1 Phosphorylation Switch at Serine 96 Induces RhoA Activation and Increased Endothelial Permeability , 2007, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[23]  M. Parrinello,et al.  Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[24]  G. Rocklin,et al.  Phosphorylation of RhoGDI by Src regulates Rho GTPase binding and cytosol-membrane cycling. , 2006, Molecular biology of the cell.

[25]  C. Dermardirossian,et al.  GDIs: central regulatory molecules in Rho GTPase activation. , 2005, Trends in cell biology.

[26]  P. Casey,et al.  Post-prenylation-processing enzymes as new targets in oncogenesis , 2005, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[27]  M. Bergo,et al.  Postprenylation CAAX processing is required for proper localization of Ras but not Rho GTPases. , 2005, Molecular biology of the cell.

[28]  Krister Wennerberg,et al.  The Ras superfamily at a glance , 2005, Journal of Cell Science.

[29]  J. Miyoshi,et al.  An activating mutant of Cdc42 that fails to interact with Rho GDP-dissociation inhibitor localizes to the plasma membrane and mediates actin reorganization. , 2004, Experimental cell research.

[30]  C. Dermardirossian,et al.  Phosphorylation of RhoGDI by Pak1 mediates dissociation of Rac GTPase. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[31]  J. Miyoshi,et al.  An activating mutant of Rac1 that fails to interact with Rho GDP-dissociation inhibitor stimulates membrane ruffling in mammalian cells. , 2004, The Biochemical journal.

[32]  K. Wennerberg,et al.  Serine Phosphorylation Negatively Regulates RhoA in Vivo* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[33]  A. Hall,et al.  Rho GTPases in cell biology , 2002, Nature.

[34]  I. Vetter,et al.  The Guanine Nucleotide-Binding Switch in Three Dimensions , 2001, Science.

[35]  A. Wilson-Delfosse,et al.  RhoGDI-binding-defective mutant of Cdc42Hs targets to membranes and activates filopodia formation but does not cycle with the cytosol of mammalian cells. , 2001, The Biochemical journal.

[36]  S. Grizot,et al.  Crystal structure of the Rac1-RhoGDI complex involved in nadph oxidase activation. , 2001, Biochemistry.

[37]  A P Golovanov,et al.  Structural consequences of site-directed mutagenesis in flexible protein domains: NMR characterization of the L(55,56)S mutant of RhoGDI. , 2001, European journal of biochemistry.

[38]  C. Dermardirossian,et al.  Structure-activity relationships in flexible protein domains: regulation of rho GTPases by RhoGDI and D4 GDI. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[39]  A. Hall,et al.  Rho GTPases and their effector proteins. , 2000, The Biochemical journal.

[40]  Gregory R. Hoffman,et al.  Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI , 2000, Cell.

[41]  K. Scheffzek,et al.  The Rac–RhoGDI complex and the structural basis for the regulation of Rho proteins by RhoGDI , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.

[42]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. , 1998, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[43]  Berk Hess,et al.  LINCS: A linear constraint solver for molecular simulations , 1997, J. Comput. Chem..

[44]  M. Rosen,et al.  C-terminal binding domain of Rho GDP-dissociation inhibitor directs N-terminal inhibitory peptide to GTPases , 1997, Nature.

[45]  G. Roberts,et al.  A modulator of rho family G proteins, rhoGDI, binds these G proteins via an immunoglobulin-like domain and a flexible N-terminal arm. , 1997, Structure.

[46]  Y. Zheng,et al.  Residues of the Rho Family GTPases Rho and Cdc42 That Specify Sensitivity to Dbl-like Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factors* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[47]  T. Darden,et al.  A smooth particle mesh Ewald method , 1995 .

[48]  C. Der,et al.  Protein prenylation: more than just glue? , 1992, Current opinion in cell biology.

[49]  M. Parrinello,et al.  Polymorphic transitions in single crystals: A new molecular dynamics method , 1981 .

[50]  Jacqueline Cherfils,et al.  Regulation of small GTPases by GEFs, GAPs, and GDIs. , 2013, Physiological reviews.

[51]  A. Hall,et al.  Cell migration: Rho GTPases lead the way. , 2004, Developmental biology.

[52]  W. Delano The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System , 2002 .

[53]  G. Bokoch,et al.  Mapping the binding site for the GTP-binding protein Rac-1 on its inhibitor RhoGDI-1. , 2000, Structure.

[54]  S. Kuroda,et al.  Regulation of the cytoskeleton and cell adhesion by the Rho family GTPases in mammalian cells. , 1999, Annual review of biochemistry.

[55]  D. Lowy,et al.  Function and regulation of ras. , 1993, Annual review of biochemistry.