Signal Analysis and Numerical Method Roles in Neural Interfaces Development

Neural interfaces are developing worldwide owing to the wide spectrum of possible applications, ranging from military to entertainment industry. Future human-machine interaction (HMI) and brain-machine interfaces (BMI) are inconceivable without further development in the field. Possible applications can also be found in traffic, i.e. remote supervision and/or control of vehicles/ships. In order to obtain effective BMI, two tasks should be performed: the calculation of the EM field by numerical methods (FEM (Finite Elements Method), BEM (Boundary Elements Method), and hybrid) and signal analysis, which should tell the machine what is required (command understanding). Examples of brain signal analysis using FFT and various WT transforms are presented. The basics of numerical methods for topic application are also covered. EEG data are obtained by experiments on consenting human subjects. Finally, the implications of neural interface development and introduction to traffic applications are considered.

[1]  Reza Langari,et al.  Classification of EEG signals for epileptic seizures using hybrid artificial neural networks based wavelet transforms and fuzzy relations , 2017, Expert Syst. Appl..

[2]  A. Hirata,et al.  HYBRID FEM/BEM FOR HUMAN HEADS EXPOSED TO HIGH FREQUENCY ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION , 2017 .

[3]  Pedro Martins,et al.  BCI Framework Based on Games to Teach People With Cognitive and Motor Limitations , 2016, ANT/SEIT.

[4]  Igor Vujović,et al.  Cutting-edge Mathematical Tools in Processing and Analysis of Signals in Marine and Navy , 2012 .

[5]  Pantelis Lioumis,et al.  Neurophysiologic markers of primary motor cortex for laryngeal muscles and premotor cortex in caudal opercular part of inferior frontal gyrus investigated in motor speech disorder: a navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) study , 2016, Cognitive Processing.

[6]  Shivnarayan Patidar,et al.  Detection of epileptic seizure using Kraskov entropy applied on tunable-Q wavelet transform of EEG signals , 2017, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[7]  I. P. Ganin,et al.  A P300-based Brain-Computer Interface with Stimuli on Moving Objects: Four-Session Single-Trial and Triple-Trial Tests with a Game-Like Task Design , 2013, PloS one.

[8]  Dragan Poljak,et al.  Hybrid BEM/FEM edge element computation of the thermal rise in the 3D model of the human eye induced by high frequency EM waves , 2012, SoftCOM 2012, 20th International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks.

[9]  Maytham Safar,et al.  Homonoia: When your Car Reads your Mind , 2017, FNC/MobiSPC.

[10]  J. W. Minett,et al.  Optimizing the P300-based brain–computer interface: current status, limitations and future directions , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[11]  T. Martin McGinnity,et al.  Evaluating Quantum Neural Network filtered motor imagery brain-computer interface using multiple classification techniques , 2015, Neurocomputing.

[12]  Marko Vukšić,et al.  Underwater ROV as Inspection and Development Platform , 2017 .

[13]  Petar Matić,et al.  Data-Based Modelling of Significant Wave Height in the Adriatic Sea , 2017 .

[14]  Dragan Poljak,et al.  On the use of the boundary element analysis in bioelectromagnetics , 2014 .

[15]  Igor Vujović,et al.  A novel approach for monitoring writing interferences during navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation mappings of writing related cortical areas , 2015, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[16]  Richard Baraniuk,et al.  The Dual-tree Complex Wavelet Transform , 2007 .

[17]  Reda A. El-Khoribi,et al.  A Novel Brain Computer Interface Based on Principle Component Analysis , 2016 .