Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Anthea Sutton | Andrew Booth | Mark Clowes | Louise Preston | L. Preston | A. Booth | A. Sutton | M. Clowes
[1] Kate Flemming,et al. Guidance on choosing qualitative evidence synthesis methods for use in health technology assessments of complex interventions , 2016 .
[2] Byron C. Wallace,et al. #CochraneTech: technology and the future of systematic reviews. , 2014, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.
[3] Claire Stansfield,et al. Finding relevant studies , 2012 .
[4] James Thomas,et al. Bmc Medical Research Methodology Methods for the Synthesis of Qualitative Research: a Critical Review , 2022 .
[5] Guy Paré,et al. Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews , 2015, Inf. Manag..
[6] M. Leeflang,et al. Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy reviews , 2013, Systematic Reviews.
[7] Simon Briscoe,et al. A review of the reporting of web searching to identify studies for Cochrane systematic reviews , 2018, Research synthesis methods.
[8] K. Hannes,et al. Synthesizing Qualitative Research: Choosing the Right Approach , 2012 .
[9] G. Kitas,et al. Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors , 2011, Rheumatology International.
[10] S. Briscoe. Erratum to: Web searching for systematic reviews: a case study of reporting standards in the UK Health Technology Assessment programme , 2015, BMC Research Notes.
[11] L. Dennett,et al. Utilisation of search filters in systematic reviews of prognosis questions. , 2012, Health information and libraries journal.
[12] L. Preston,et al. Improving search efficiency for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: an exploratory study to assess the viability of limiting to MEDLINE, EMBASE and reference checking , 2015, Systematic Reviews.
[13] D. Moher,et al. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[14] S. Seuring,et al. Conducting content‐analysis based literature reviews in supply chain management , 2012 .
[15] Pierre Pluye,et al. Performance of a mixed filter to identify relevant studies for mixed studies reviews. , 2016, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.
[16] T. Greenhalgh,et al. Understanding heart failure; explaining telehealth – a hermeneutic systematic review , 2017, BMC Cardiovascular Disorders.
[17] Donna Ciliska,et al. Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews , 2010, Implementation science : IS.
[18] Marcia J. Bates,et al. The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface , 1989 .
[19] S. Oliver. Advantages of concurrent preparation and reporting of systematic reviews of quantitative and qualitative evidence , 2015, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.
[20] Alexa McArthur,et al. Innovations in the systematic review of text and opinion , 2015, International journal of evidence-based healthcare.
[21] M. Dixon-Woods,et al. Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups , 2006 .
[22] David C Hoaglin,et al. Conducting indirect-treatment-comparison and network-meta-analysis studies: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 2. , 2011, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.
[23] J. Chamova,et al. European network for health technology assessment – EUnetHTA , 2013 .
[24] David Atkins,et al. AHRQ series paper 1: comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the effective health-care program. , 2010, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[25] Kate Flemming,et al. Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series-paper 2: methods for question formulation, searching, and protocol development for qualitative evidence synthesis. , 2017, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[26] A. Booth,et al. A comparison of results of empirical studies of supplementary search techniques and recommendations in review methodology handbooks: a methodological review , 2017, Systematic Reviews.
[27] J. Angus Webb,et al. Simplifying the selection of evidence synthesis methods to inform environmental decisions: a guide for decision makers and scientists , 2017 .
[28] C. Pope,et al. Evaluating meta-ethnography: systematic analysis and synthesis of qualitative research. , 2011, Health technology assessment.
[29] M. Foster. From the Office of a Systematic Review Consultant , 2018, HERD.
[30] A. Booth. Searching for qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: a structured methodological review , 2016, Systematic Reviews.
[31] Andrew Booth,et al. Supplementary search methods were more effective and offered better value than bibliographic database searching: A case study from public health and environmental enhancement , 2018, Research synthesis methods.
[32] M. Farquhar,et al. Support needs of patients with COPD: a systematic literature search and narrative review , 2018, International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
[33] M. Leeflang,et al. Search Filters for Finding Prognostic and Diagnostic Prediction Studies in Medline to Enhance Systematic Reviews , 2012, PloS one.
[34] Zachary Munn,et al. Qualitative research synthesis: methodological guidance for systematic reviewers utilizing meta-aggregation , 2015, International journal of evidence-based healthcare.
[35] Lisa Hartling,et al. Same family, different species: methodological conduct and quality varies according to purpose for five types of knowledge synthesis. , 2017, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[36] M. Clarke,et al. Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions , 2011, BMC medical research methodology.
[37] Neil Hawkins,et al. How Far Do You Go? Efficient Searching for Indirect Evidence , 2009, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.
[38] M. R. Harris. The librarian's roles in the systematic review process: a case study. , 2005, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.
[39] A. Booth,et al. “Best fit” framework synthesis: refining the method , 2013, BMC Medical Research Methodology.
[40] David Moher,et al. Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach , 2012, Systematic Reviews.
[41] Andrew Booth,et al. "Brimful of STARLITE": toward standards for reporting literature searches. , 2006, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.
[42] A. Sutton,et al. Searching for indirect evidence and extending the network of studies for network meta-analysis: case study in venous thromboembolic events prevention following elective total knee replacement surgery. , 2014, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.
[43] Ray Pawson,et al. RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses , 2013, BMC Medicine.
[44] Mary Edmunds Otter,et al. Developing the Librarians' Role in Supporting Grant Applications and Reducing Waste in Research: Outcomes From a Literature Review and Survey in the NIHR Research Design Service , 2017 .
[45] Julie Nanavati,et al. Realist Review: Current Practice and Future Prospects , 2016 .
[46] N. Mutrie,et al. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of exercise referral schemes: a systematic review and economic evaluation. , 2011, Health technology assessment.
[47] Jennifer A. Byrne. Improving the peer review of narrative literature reviews , 2016, Research Integrity and Peer Review.
[48] D. Stannard,et al. Chapter 2: Systematic Reviews of Qualitative Evidence , 2020, JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis.
[49] Jennifer D'Souza,et al. Knowledge synthesis methods for generating or refining theory: a scoping review reveals that little guidance is available. , 2016, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[50] C. Mulrow. The medical review article: state of the science. , 1987, Annals of internal medicine.
[51] David Ogilvie,et al. Pinpointing needles in giant haystacks: use of text mining to reduce impractical screening workload in extremely large scoping reviews , 2014, Research synthesis methods.
[52] S. Oliver,et al. Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ , 2012, BMC Medical Research Methodology.
[53] J. Higgins. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration , 2011 .
[54] Julie Glanville,et al. The loss of the NHS EED and DARE databases and the effect on evidence synthesis and evaluation. , 2017, Research synthesis methods.
[55] Claes Wohlin,et al. Guidelines for snowballing in systematic literature studies and a replication in software engineering , 2014, EASE '14.
[56] Neal R. Haddaway,et al. A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences , 2016, Environmental Evidence.
[57] Andrew Booth,et al. How much searching is enough? Comprehensive versus optimal retrieval for technology assessments , 2010, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.
[58] Margarete Sandelowski,et al. A Bayesian method for the synthesis of evidence from qualitative and quantitative reports: The example of antiretroviral medication adherence , 2009, Journal of health services research & policy.
[59] Nila A Sathe,et al. Searching for studies: a guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews , 2017 .
[60] Margarete Sandelowski,et al. The Challenges of Searching for and Retrieving Qualitative Studies , 2003, Western journal of nursing research.
[61] Maria J Grant,et al. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. , 2009, Health information and libraries journal.
[62] Ashley K Kable,et al. A structured approach to documenting a search strategy for publication: a 12 step guideline for authors. , 2012, Nurse education today.
[63] C. Willis,et al. A time-responsive tool for informing policy making: rapid realist review , 2013, Implementation Science.
[64] Christina Niederstadt,et al. Reporting and presenting information retrieval processes: the need for optimizing common practice in health technology assessment , 2010, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.
[65] Julie Glanville,et al. Choosing and using methodological search filters: searchers' views. , 2014, Health information and libraries journal.
[66] David R. Jones,et al. Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: A review of possible methods , 2005 .
[67] R. Whittemore,et al. The integrative review: updated methodology. , 2005, Journal of advanced nursing.
[68] Anthea Sutton,et al. Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review , 2012 .
[69] A. Tricco,et al. What is the most appropriate knowledge synthesis method to conduct a review? Protocol for a scoping review , 2012, BMC Medical Research Methodology.
[70] Andrew Booth,et al. Towards a methodology for cluster searching to provide conceptual and contextual “richness” for systematic reviews of complex interventions: case study (CLUSTER) , 2013, BMC Medical Research Methodology.
[71] Tari Turner,et al. Living Systematic Reviews: An Emerging Opportunity to Narrow the Evidence-Practice Gap , 2014, PLoS medicine.
[72] Monika Kastner,et al. Conceptual recommendations for selecting the most appropriate knowledge synthesis method to answer research questions related to complex evidence. , 2016, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[74] Chorong Park,et al. Methods for knowledge synthesis: an overview. , 2014, Heart & lung : the journal of critical care.
[75] Claire Stansfield,et al. Exploring issues in the conduct of website searching and other online sources for systematic reviews: how can we be systematic? , 2016, Systematic Reviews.
[76] Pauline Campbell,et al. Selecting and implementing overview methods: implications from five exemplar overviews , 2017, Systematic Reviews.
[77] Jonathan D. Eldredge,et al. Roles for librarians in systematic reviews: a scoping review , 2018, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.
[78] S. Ananiadou,et al. Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches , 2015, Systematic Reviews.
[79] Ray Pawson,et al. RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews , 2013, BMC Medicine.
[80] D. Moher,et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[81] Zachary Munn,et al. What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences , 2018, BMC Medical Research Methodology.
[82] Jonathan B. Koffel. Use of Recommended Search Strategies in Systematic Reviews and the Impact of Librarian Involvement: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Recent Authors , 2015, PloS one.
[83] Margarete Sandelowski,et al. Bayesian Approaches to the Synthesis of Qualitative and Quantitative Research Findings , 2012 .
[84] P. Glasziou,et al. Systematic review automation technologies , 2014, Systematic Reviews.
[85] J. Kavanagh,et al. Mixed Methods Synthesis: A Worked Example , 2012 .
[86] Barbara Paterson,et al. The Retrieval and Assessment of Primary Research , 2001 .
[87] D. Moher,et al. A scoping review of rapid review methods , 2015, BMC Medicine.
[88] C. Cooper,et al. How to get started with a systematic review in epidemiology: an introductory guide for early career researchers , 2013, Archives of Public Health.
[89] H. Suri. Purposeful sampling in qualitative research synthesis , 2011 .
[90] Karin Hannes,et al. A move to more systematic and transparent approaches in qualitative evidence synthesis: update on a review of published papers , 2012 .
[91] C. Terwee,et al. Development of a methodological PubMed search filter for finding studies on measurement properties of measurement instruments , 2009, Quality of Life Research.
[92] David Moher,et al. All in the Family: systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more , 2015, Systematic Reviews.
[93] C. Bradbury‐Jones,et al. An analysis of current practices in undertaking literature reviews in nursing: findings from a focused mapping review and synthesis , 2019, BMC Medical Research Methodology.
[94] Rachel Arnold,et al. A research synthesis and taxonomic classification of the organizational stressors encountered by sport performers. , 2012, Journal of sport & exercise psychology.
[95] P. Enck,et al. Is the Impact of Starvation on the Gut Microbiota Specific or Unspecific to Anorexia Nervosa? A Narrative Review Based on a Systematic Literature Search , 2018, Current neuropharmacology.
[96] Jane Noyes,et al. A methodological systematic review of what’s wrong with meta-ethnography reporting , 2014, BMC Medical Research Methodology.
[97] Jill Barr-Walker,et al. Evidence-based information needs of public health workers: a systematized review , 2017, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.
[98] Kate Flemming,et al. Synthesising quantitative and qualitative evidence to inform guidelines on complex interventions: clarifying the purposes, designs and outlining some methods , 2019, BMJ Global Health.
[99] A. Harden,et al. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews , 2008, BMC medical research methodology.
[100] David Moher,et al. The art and science of knowledge synthesis. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[101] Laura A. Levit,et al. Finding what works in health care : standards for systematic reviews , 2011 .
[102] Sharon E. Straus,et al. A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews , 2016, BMC Medical Research Methodology.
[103] Andrew Booth,et al. Systematic searching for theory to inform systematic reviews: is it feasible? Is it desirable? , 2015, Health information and libraries journal.
[104] Marko Ćurković,et al. (Re)search Filter Bubble Effect-An Issue Still Unfairly Neglected. , 2020, Advances in nutrition.
[105] Monika Kastner,et al. A scoping review identifies multiple emerging knowledge synthesis methods, but few studies operationalize the method. , 2016, Journal of clinical epidemiology.