Methods for clinical evaluation of noise reduction techniques in abdominopelvic CT.

Most noise reduction methods involve nonlinear processes, and objective evaluation of image quality can be challenging, since image noise cannot be fully characterized on the sole basis of the noise level at computed tomography (CT). Noise spatial correlation (or noise texture) is closely related to the detection and characterization of low-contrast objects and may be quantified by analyzing the noise power spectrum. High-contrast spatial resolution can be measured using the modulation transfer function and section sensitivity profile and is generally unaffected by noise reduction. Detectability of low-contrast lesions can be evaluated subjectively at varying dose levels using phantoms containing low-contrast objects. Clinical applications with inherent high-contrast abnormalities (eg, CT for renal calculi, CT enterography) permit larger dose reductions with denoising techniques. In low-contrast tasks such as detection of metastases in solid organs, dose reduction is substantially more limited by loss of lesion conspicuity due to loss of low-contrast spatial resolution and coarsening of noise texture. Existing noise reduction strategies for dose reduction have a substantial impact on lowering the radiation dose at CT. To preserve the diagnostic benefit of CT examination, thoughtful utilization of these strategies must be based on the inherent lesion-to-background contrast and the anatomy of interest. The authors provide an overview of existing noise reduction strategies for low-dose abdominopelvic CT, including analytic reconstruction, image and projection space denoising, and iterative reconstruction; review qualitative and quantitative tools for evaluating these strategies; and discuss the strengths and limitations of individual noise reduction methods.

[1]  Marc Kachelriess,et al.  Single-slice reconstruction in spiral cone-beam computed tomography , 2000, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[2]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Ieee Transactions on Image Processing: to Appear Globally Convergent Algorithms for Maximum a Posteriori Transmission Tomography , 2022 .

[3]  P. Gevenois,et al.  Suspected acute colon diverticulitis: imaging with low-dose unenhanced multi-detector row CT. , 2005, Radiology.

[4]  K. Lange,et al.  EM reconstruction algorithms for emission and transmission tomography. , 1984, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[5]  K. P. Kim,et al.  Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study , 2012, The Lancet.

[6]  N. Obuchowski,et al.  Effect of altering automatic exposure control settings and quality reference mAs on radiation dose, image quality, and diagnostic efficacy in MDCT enterography of active inflammatory Crohn's disease. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  K. Lee,et al.  Diagnosis of acute appendicitis with sliding slab ray-sum interpretation of low-dose unenhanced CT and standard-dose i.v. contrast-enhanced CT scans. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  Jing Wang,et al.  Penalized weighted least-squares approach to sinogram noise reduction and image reconstruction for low-dose X-ray computed tomography , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Statistical image reconstruction for polyenergetic X-ray computed tomography , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  D. Hough,et al.  Pilot Study of Detection, Radiologist Confidence and Image Quality With Sinogram-Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction at Half–Routine Dose Level , 2013, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[11]  D. Sahani,et al.  Low-dose CT examinations in Crohn's disease: Impact on image quality, diagnostic performance, and radiation dose. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  Cynthia M. McCollough,et al.  Projection space denoising with bilateral filtering and CT noise modeling for dose reduction in CT. , 2009, Medical physics.

[13]  Jean-Baptiste Thibault,et al.  A three-dimensional statistical approach to improved image quality for multislice helical CT. , 2007, Medical physics.

[14]  Jeffrey A. Fessler Penalized weighted least-squares image reconstruction for positron emission tomography , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[15]  J. Platt,et al.  CT enterography at 80 kVp with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction versus at 120 kVp with standard reconstruction: image quality, diagnostic adequacy, and dose reduction. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  David H. Kim,et al.  Abdominal CT with model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR): initial results of a prospective trial comparing ultralow-dose with standard-dose imaging. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  Peter Vock,et al.  Nonlinear three-dimensional noise filter with low-dose CT angiography: effect on the detection of small high-contrast objects in a phantom model. , 2011, Radiology.

[18]  Jiang Hsieh,et al.  Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques. , 2010, Radiology.

[19]  Hae Young Kim,et al.  Low-dose abdominal CT for evaluating suspected appendicitis. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  J. Hsieh Adaptive streak artifact reduction in computed tomography resulting from excessive x-ray photon noise. , 1998, Medical physics.

[21]  James M. Kofler,et al.  Perspective on radiation risk in CT imaging , 2013, Abdominal Imaging.

[22]  Nils Dahlström,et al.  Radiation Dose Reduction With Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction Technique for Abdominal Computed Tomography , 2012, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[23]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Iterative reconstruction in image space (IRIS) in cardiac computed tomography: initial experience , 2011, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[24]  M. Defrise,et al.  Iterative reconstruction for helical CT: a simulation study. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[25]  D. Brenner,et al.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  William Pavlicek,et al.  Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[27]  Joel G Fletcher,et al.  In defense of body CT. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[28]  Armando Manduca,et al.  Feasibility of dose reduction using novel denoising techniques for low kV (80 kV) CT enterography: optimization and validation. , 2010, Academic radiology.

[29]  Individualized kV Selection and Tube Current Reduction in Excretory Phase Computed Tomography Urography: Potential for Radiation Dose Reduction and the Contribution of Iterative Reconstruction to Image Quality , 2013, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[30]  Donald L. Miller,et al.  Cancer risks associated with external radiation from diagnostic imaging procedures , 2012, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[31]  Alvin C. Silva,et al.  Iterative Reconstruction Technique for Reducing Body Radiation Dose at Ct: Feasibility Study Hara Et Al. Ct Iterative Reconstruction Technique Gastrointestinal Imaging Original Research , 2022 .

[32]  C. McCollough,et al.  Radiation dose reduction in computed tomography: techniques and future perspective. , 2009, Imaging in medicine.

[33]  Joel G Fletcher,et al.  Validation of Dual-Source Single-Tube Reconstruction as a Method to Obtain Half-Dose Images to Evaluate Radiation Dose and Noise Reduction: Phantom and Human Assessment Using CT Colonography and Sinogram-Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction (SAFIRE) , 2012, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[34]  Joseph A. O'Sullivan,et al.  Effect of contrast magnitude and resolution metric on noise-resolution tradeoffs in x-ray CT imaging: a comparison of non-quadratic penalized alternating minimization and filtered backprojection algorithms , 2011, Medical Imaging.

[35]  D. Miglioretti,et al.  Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. , 2009, Archives of internal medicine.

[36]  Rainer Raupach,et al.  Effect of nonlinear three-dimensional optimized reconstruction algorithm filter on image quality and radiation dose: validation on phantoms. , 2008, Medical physics.

[37]  Sheila Weinmann,et al.  Use of diagnostic imaging studies and associated radiation exposure for patients enrolled in large integrated health care systems, 1996-2010. , 2012, JAMA.

[38]  D. Jaffray,et al.  A framework for noise-power spectrum analysis of multidimensional images. , 2002, Medical physics.

[39]  Lifeng Yu,et al.  Reducing radiation dose in CT enterography. , 2013, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[40]  K. Stierstorfer,et al.  Spatial resolution improvement and dose reduction potential for inner ear CT imaging using a z-axis deconvolution technique. , 2013, Medical physics.

[41]  Shuai Leng,et al.  Prediction of human observer performance in a 2-alternative forced choice low-contrast detection task using channelized Hotelling observer: impact of radiation dose and reconstruction algorithms. , 2013, Medical physics.

[42]  D. Sahani,et al.  Reducing Abdominal CT Radiation Dose With Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Technique , 2010, Investigative radiology.

[43]  Nancy A Obuchowski,et al.  Contrast-to-noise ratio and low-contrast object resolution on full- and low-dose MDCT: SAFIRE versus filtered back projection in a low-contrast object phantom and in the liver. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[44]  J M Boone,et al.  Determination of the presampled MTF in computed tomography. , 2001, Medical physics.

[45]  Patrick J. La Rivière,et al.  Penalized-likelihood sinogram restoration for computed tomography , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[46]  Armando Manduca,et al.  Noise reduction to decrease radiation dose and improve conspicuity of hepatic lesions at contrast-enhanced 80-kV hepatic CT using projection space denoising. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[47]  Natalie N. Braun,et al.  Strategies for reducing radiation dose in CT. , 2009, Radiologic clinics of North America.