Detection of breast cancer with full-field digital mammography and computer-aided detection.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to evaluate computer-aided detection (CAD) performance with full-field digital mammography (FFDM). MATERIALS AND METHODS CAD (Second Look, version 7.2) was used to evaluate 123 cases of breast cancer detected with FFDM (Senographe DS). Retrospectively, CAD sensitivity was assessed using breast density, mammographic presentation, histopathology results, and lesion size. To determine the case-based false-positive rate, patients with four standard views per case were included in the study group. Eighteen unilateral mammography examinations with nonstandard views were excluded, resulting in a sample of 105 bilateral cases. RESULTS CAD detected 115 (94%) of 123 cancer cases: six of six (100%) in fatty breasts, 63 of 66 (95%) in breasts containing scattered fibroglandular densities, 43 of 46 (93%) in heterogeneously dense breasts, and three of five (60%) in extremely dense breasts. CAD detected 93% (41/44) of cancers manifesting as calcifications, 92% (57/62) as masses, and 100% (17/17) as mixed masses and calcifications. CAD detected 94% of the invasive ductal carcinomas (n = 63), 100% of the invasive lobular carcinomas (n = 7), 91% of the other invasive carcinomas (n = 11), and 93% of the ductal carcinomas in situ (n = 42). CAD sensitivity for cancers 1-10 mm (n = 55) was 89%; 11-20 mm (n = 37), 97%; 21-30 mm (n = 16), 100%; and larger than 30 mm (n = 15), 93%. The CAD false-positive rate was 2.3 marks per four-image case. CONCLUSION CAD with FFDM showed a high sensitivity in identifying cancers manifesting as calcifications and masses. Sensitivity was maintained in cancers with lower mammographic sensitivity, including invasive lobular carcinomas and small neoplasms (1-20 mm). CAD with FFDM should be effective in assisting radiologists with earlier detection of breast cancer. Future studies are needed to assess CAD accuracy in larger populations.

[1]  D. Ikeda,et al.  Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection. , 2001, Radiology.

[2]  W. P. Evans,et al.  Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: mammographic characteristics and computer-aided detection. , 2002, Radiology.

[3]  Anabel M Scaranelo,et al.  Sensitivity of a Direct Computer-aided Detection System in Full-field Digital Mammography for Detection of Microcalcifications Not Associated with Mass or Architectural Distortion , 2010, Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes.

[4]  L. Tabár,et al.  Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. , 2000, Radiology.

[5]  M. J. Yaffe,et al.  Screening Mammography-detected Cancers: Sensitivity of a Computer-aided Detection System Applied to Full-Field Digital Mammograms , 2008 .

[6]  David Gur,et al.  Computer-aided detection; the effect of training databases on detection of subtle breast masses. , 2010, Academic radiology.

[7]  Woo Kyung Moon,et al.  Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms. , 2007, Radiology.

[8]  Thomas Boehm,et al.  Influence of breast lesion size and histologic findings on tumor detection rate of a computer-aided detection system. , 2003, Radiology.

[9]  T. Freer,et al.  Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. , 2001, Radiology.

[10]  C. Das,et al.  FDG-PET Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced CT in the Management of Breast Cancer. , 2009, PET clinics.

[11]  Rachel F Brem,et al.  Improvement in sensitivity of screening mammography with computer-aided detection: a multiinstitutional trial. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  F. Shtern Digital mammography and related technologies: a perspective from the National Cancer Institute. , 1992, Radiology.

[13]  P. Skaane,et al.  Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  Martin J Yaffe,et al.  Digital mammography. , 2005, Radiology.

[15]  S. Fields,et al.  Quantitative characterization of mass lesions on digitized mammograms for computer-assisted diagnosis. , 2000, Investigative radiology.

[16]  Jeffrey W Hoffmeister,et al.  Evaluation of breast cancer with a computer‐aided detection system by mammographic appearance and histopathology , 2005, Cancer.

[17]  Jeffrey W Hoffmeister,et al.  Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection for breast cancer. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  Constantine A Gatsonis,et al.  American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trial: objectives and methodology. , 2005, Radiology.

[19]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Diagnostic Performance of Digital versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening , 2006 .